imo, the 360 is going to win, not because its better, not becauseits marketing is better, not because the games are better (tho most people think they are) but because most game developers are lazy, to make a game on the ps3 using all its capabuilitys is a lot harder and takes a lot longer to do, but the results are increadible, i mean look at mgs4 the best looking game i have ever seen hands down, and then kill zone 2 dont need to say anything else there. now with the xbox 360 the games dont look nearly as good but they still look ok, and the games come out faster, and they have halo, wich is the biggest most overrated game i have ever seen, its not that great of a game, i personaly like resistance better. and even tho the ps3 isnt that expencive anymore people are still convinced that its a wast of money cuz its way more expencive than the xbox, but its not taht much more and is a way better bargain.
Originally posted by niduin
imo, the 360 is going to win, not because its better, not becauseits marketing is better, not because the games are better (tho most people think they are) but because most game developers are lazy, to make a game on the ps3 using all its capabuilitys is a lot harder and takes a lot longer to do, but the results are increadible, i mean look at mgs4 the best looking game i have ever seen hands down, and then kill zone 2 dont need to say anything else there. now with the xbox 360 the games dont look nearly as good but they still look ok, and the games come out faster, and they have halo, wich is the biggest most overrated game i have ever seen, its not that great of a game, i personaly like resistance better. and even tho the ps3 isnt that expencive anymore people are still convinced that its a wast of money cuz its way more expencive than the xbox, but its not taht much more and is a way better bargain.
Originally posted by niduin
imo, the 360 is going to win, not because its better, not becauseits marketing is better, not because the games are better (tho most people think they are) but because most game developers are lazy, to make a game on the ps3 using all its capabuilitys is a lot harder and takes a lot longer to do, but the results are increadible, i mean look at mgs4 the best looking game i have ever seen hands down, and then kill zone 2 dont need to say anything else there. now with the xbox 360 the games dont look nearly as good but they still look ok, and the games come out faster, and they have halo, wich is the biggest most overrated game i have ever seen, its not that great of a game, i personaly like resistance better. and even tho the ps3 isnt that expencive anymore people are still convinced that its a wast of money cuz its way more expencive than the xbox, but its not taht much more and is a way better bargain.
You haven't seen Crysis, have you?
im not saying everything about mgs4 looks better, infact there were a few things that really pissed me off because they didnt bother to make them look as good as the rest, but look at the characters especially snake, he looks amazing and from what i have seen of crysis its not nearly as good visually as mgs4
Originally posted by niduin
im not saying everything about mgs4 looks better, infact there were a few things that really pissed me off because they didnt bother to make them look as good as the rest, but look at the characters especially snake, he looks amazing and from what i have seen of crysis its not nearly as good visually as mgs4
Every aspect of Crysis(on a reasonable resolution and high settings) looks better than MSG4: from characters to terrain. It's not an opinion, it's a fact.