Originally posted by EPIIIBITES
IS THE SENATOR'S STARSHIP BLOWING UP AT THE BEGINNING OF EP II NOT THE TASTIEST EXPLOSION EVER MADE?NOT EVEN A SMALL THING LIKE THAT WITH THAT MUCH QUALITY STOOD OUT IN EPIII...NOTHING. (sorry bout caps)
Your loss, not mine, I thought the final duel was much better than the explosion. BTW, quoting yourself is really dumb.
Well what i didnt like about E2 was the serious lack of anything going on, all the movie was basically was Anakin and Padime sitting around wile Anakin begs for pu**y the hole movie, In E3 theres action always somthing going on, like Ebert said in his review, "a return to space opera and action", the good parts of the OT and that was what all of them should of been, as i said E1 wasnt to bad, but E2 was like a soap opera.
Originally posted by EHmasterJedi
Well what i didnt like about E2 was the serious lack of anything going on, all the movie was basically was Anakin and Padime sitting around wile Anakin begs for pu**y the hole movie, In E3 theres action always somthing going on, like Ebert said in his review, "a return to space opera and action", the good parts of the OT and that was what all of them should of been, as i said E1 wasnt to bad, but E2 was like a soap opera.
Yeah, the middle of the movie was slow. And I agree, in Ep. 3 the Anakin/Padme sceens were streamlined and shorter, and the back-to-back action make sense because they are in the middle of a war.
Originally posted by Batman316
There was lots to marvel at in this movie, and the Duel was AWESOME but did it deliver on it's promises? did it connect PT with OT?the simple answer is NO
i hear ya. but oh well. wasn't mon mthma supposed to be in this one, discussing an alliance with bail? that should've been in there. and qui-gon's scene, too.
I read it.... and you know what I noticed? From a "real Star Wars fan," the fellow NEVER ONCE cites anything from OT in his arguements. Everything he cites is "this was cool in Ep1," and mostly, "this was cool in ep2." If he were a real Star Wars fan, whouldn't he be comparing ROTS to OT to make a judgement on if it lives up to "true Star Wars?"
Furthermore, I just read an article in Entertainment weekly, which says, through quotes from GL himself, that out of his prequel story, 60% was in Ep3, and 20% each were in Ep1 and Ep2. Lucas himself went on to say that MOST OF WHAT HE PUT INTO TPM and AOTC was FILLER to stretch the movies out to 2 hours lol....
Does that make them more truly Star Wars than Ep3???
Originally posted by Lazerlike42
I read it.... and you know what I noticed? From a "real Star Wars fan," the fellow NEVER ONCE cites anything from OT in his arguements. Everything he cites is "this was cool in Ep1," and mostly, "this was cool in ep2." If he were a real Star Wars fan, whouldn't he be comparing ROTS to OT to make a judgement on if it lives up to "true Star Wars?"Furthermore, I just read an article in Entertainment weekly, which says, through quotes from GL himself, that out of his prequel story, 60% was in Ep3, and 20% each were in Ep1 and Ep2. Lucas himself went on to say that MOST OF WHAT HE PUT INTO TPM and AOTC was FILLER to stretch the movies out to 2 hours lol....
Does that make them more truly Star Wars than Ep3???
well said.
who are the wookies? the planet? wha????
ok lucas put kashyyyk to please the fans that have been bitchin' about not having some wookie love in the last two films.
it's like bitchin' about who is the wampa? are there more wampas? do they all eat taun tauns?, there's a big freaking story going on pal!!! pay attention