Things you liked and didnt like about episode 3

Started by astrofan42810 pages

Honestly Natalie's only strong scene is the Senate scene, you are really into the Musatafar scene but that is all because of Anakin(and OW). And the same thing for the Obi-Wan scene, great scene but mostly because of Ewan, though her "your going to kill him arent you?" was delivered well.

I think the movie was awesome. About Luke not changing his name, it wasn't about Luke. Vadar and the Emperor knew they had a son, but what the didn't know about was Leiya, all they had do really do is hide one of the twins from him. Plus, Luke was a gaylord, he should of died.

Another thing I would like to point out. Mace vs. Sidious, Sidious was unarmed when fighting mace (I think). Mace vs Yoda, both had their sabres.

I think Annikan turning to the darkside was perfect. It started when he saw visions of his mother dying, now he sees his wife dying so he wants to save her. Did it ever occur to you that Sidious implanted the visions? After all when Annaking met with Sidious, Sidious already knew about the dreams. According to the Jedi, Annakin was the one who would bring balance to the force and the Jedi. But somewhere in the movie Yoda said maybe they read the proficy wrong. Perhaps Annakin was to bring balance to the Siths. Also, Annakin easily fell to the power of Sidious because Sidious has massive amount of knowledge in the force, ontop of that Annakin wasn't like any other Jedi's who were born in the Jedi order, he expierenced other things before learning the ways of the force.

I loved seeing the old movie ships in episode three. Especially how they were basicly the same ships but alittle different.

However, I disliked the General. Four arms and he couldn't really do anything with four light Sabers!

Also there was proof in the movie showing that Sidious was Plageuise's apprentice and that he knew somewhat of how to save lives, yet I think Sidius didn't have enough power to create it. Since Plagiues had the power to create or restore life, it was always shown that annakin never really had a father. Perhaps somehow plagiues created a son with out sex to rule the sith? Who knows. But anyway there is prove about manipulating lives because Sidius in the beggining looks maybe 60 years old, but when he exerts all his power on mace he becomes older, it's also noted that Yoda says Palp exceeded his term and is very old. Perhaps as old as Yoda and the most Palp can do about creating life is just slow down death, yet with Vaders powers he can find a way.

Yes there were some editing errors, but I really didn't notice untill some fags were like. "One second he was there and then his finger was up!" omfg what a bad movie. Stfu and enjoy it, it all made sense. He left the holes for you to put your onw thoughts in there. I also saw somewhere how the movie really relates to story in the bible and such. Go look.

Originally posted by NWFullback
I think the movie was awesome. About Luke not changing his name, it wasn't about Luke. Vadar and the Emperor knew they had a son, but what the didn't know about was Leiya, all they had do really do is hide one of the twins from him. Plus, Luke was a gaylord, he should of died.

Not true... The Sith did not know of Luke's existence until Episode V. Padme was made to look still pregnant so they most likely believed the child/children died with Padme.

Well, Vader definitely did not know as is evident in the scene ine Empire after Palpatine tells him "...is the offspring of Anakin Skywalker. to which Vader says "How is the possible?". Palpatine may have known, but Vader certainly did not. It was foolish for the Lars's to name Luke 'Skywalker'.

Originally posted by NWFullback
However, I disliked the General. Four arms and he couldn't really do anything with four light Sabers!

I disliked Grievous, but for different reasons... He couldn't do much with them because he wasn't a Jedi... he couldnt use The Force.

Grievous was a huge disappointment. He just wasn't the bad ass that he was hyped up to be.

I also wanted more screen time for the Clone Troopers and cyborg Vader.

Portman's acting was atrocious.

Everything else was just fine in my opinion, especially McDiarmid's Palpatine/Sidious.

I thought the Kashyyyk battle was a little overhyped.... it only lasted a few minutes and more scenes would have helped it greatly... but other than that... great movie!

Originally posted by DeVi| D0do
It was foolish for the Lars's to name Luke 'Skywalker'.

True, but Lucas made this problem when he decided to have Vader as Luke's father.

Remember, when ANH was made, Luke had a father, who was killed by Darth Vader, an old apprentice of Obi-Wans. Anakin was killed by Vader, but the name "Skywalker" would not mean an awful lot.

Anakin was originally one of the many Jedi that Vader eliminated rememeber. When ANH was being made, Lucas didn't even have any significance planned for the Skywalker name. As far as ANH goes, Vader is one man, and Anakin Skywalker is someone completely different.

That's a major plothole when you think about it. The script as it stoof doesn't hold up to heavy scrutiny due to the fact ANH was written with Anakin being killed by Vader in mind. ESB and ROTJ were written with Anakin and Vader being one man.

This explains why Lucas didn't have Luke under a different name. When he started Star Wars, "Skywalker" was the name of a great Jedi hero adventurer, who got himself killed (and its why Owen is apprehensive - not because he became Vader).

There are two "universes" with Star Wars. ANH lives in the universe where Anakin was killed. That's the way it was written. You can tell. By some bizarre coincidence and luck, it manages to fit relatively well considerring Lucas rewrote Anakins backstory for ESB. It still gelled well with ANH - now Uncle Owen is apprehensive about Luke following his fathers footsteps but depending on what Obi-Wan told him, he may not even know Anakin became Vader, which is why he had no reason to change the boys name.

its 2 ****ing dramatic look what ive posted about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!