Originally posted by Raoul
ah, i was thinking something different as regards to lightspeed...and i don't know who the third picture is...
Just saying, comics aren't the best source of accurate physics. Stuff like that happens constantly.
And the picture, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Ross.
Originally posted by Soljer
Just saying, comics aren't the best source of accurate physics. Stuff like that happens constantly.And the picture, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Ross.
lol, i know, i guess when someone like johns, who researches so much, writes it a certain way, well...
ah...
Originally posted by Scoobless
I meant the adamantium shell ... no reason he shouldn't be able to.Is there? 😕
Well, considering that he has charged his own adamantium staff before, and caused an explosion while leaving his staff completely intact, I really doubt it. I'm not sure if gambit has worked his stuff on secondary adamantium before, but I doubt there would be a difference.
Originally posted by Ouallada
Well, considering that he has charged his own adamantium staff before, and caused an explosion while leaving his staff completely intact, I really doubt it. I'm not sure if gambit has worked his stuff on secondary adamantium before, but I doubt there would be a difference.
So the explosive force destroying the charged object is usually only a side effect?
Originally posted by Scoobless
So the explosive force destroying the charged object is usually only a side effect?
Well ignoring the fact that adamantium exploding while remaining intact is silly, the rest of the charged objects at least experience physical degradation, depending on the charge. Adamantium is the exception here, in my opinion.