Spiderman or Manspider? (Dedicated 2 Mr Parker)

Dude! IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE HAS ORGANICS!

They could've had Spider-Man come from a different planet, and it would be good as long as the story was good.

You're too wrapped up in the things they changed in the movie to bother with appreciation on how hard they worked on creating the films!

They had excellent story telling and some pretty good actors.

Spider-Man could have absolutely NO powers, and it just be about Peter Parker, and it would still make a wonderful film.

Yet all you care about is that it wasn't true to the comics!

For the last time, No movie is true to their books, and that goes for superhero movies, too.

the books are really just reference points for the movies!

I mean, Lord of the Rings had cut out so many things in their films, and I mean A LOT of stuff was taken out and changed. And look how great that movie was! Same thing with Harry Potter, particularly Prisoner of Azkaban!

The X-Men was pretty far with the comic books, too. And that was pretty good.

Spider-Man was a great movie, and you seem to be too overshadowed by the organics to agree!

I personally think you're going at this all the wrong way! And you can argue about it all you want! But I'm sticking to my opinion!

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
Dude! IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE HAS ORGANICS!

They could've had Spider-Man come from a different planet, and it would be good as long as the story was good.

You're too wrapped up in the things they changed in the movie to bother with appreciation on how hard they worked on creating the films!

They had excellent story telling and some pretty good actors.

Spider-Man could have absolutely NO powers, and it just be about Peter Parker, and it would still make a wonderful film.

Yet all you care about is that it wasn't true to the comics!

For the last time, No movie is true to their books, and that goes for superhero movies, too.

the books are really just reference points for the movies!

I mean, Lord of the Rings had cut out so many things in their films, and I mean A LOT of stuff was taken out and changed. And look how great that movie was! Same thing with Harry Potter, particularly Prisoner of Azkaban!

The X-Men was pretty far with the comic books, too. And that was pretty good.

Spider-Man was a great movie, and you seem to be too overshadowed by the organics to agree!

I personally think you're going at this all the wrong way! And you can argue about it all you want! But I'm sticking to my opinion!

Seriously who cares about organics. I really like it better this way anyway. Who heard of making webbing going that far, and so much that fits in a little thing. Every second he worries about refilling the web. I love the idea that it is organics. The Spiderman movies are good. Be grate full they even made a Spiderman movie, thats very good.

Originally posted by Superman 24
Seriously who cares about organics. I really like it better this way anyway. Who heard of making webbing going that far, and so much that fits in a little thing. Every second he worries about refilling the web. I love the idea that it is organics. The Spiderman movies are good. Be grate full they even made a Spiderman movie, thats very good.

I totally agree. 🙂

And not just that, but a Spider-Man movie with an excellent story plot.

And organic webs make about as much sense as laser vision, or claws coming out of a guy's fist.

As I've said thousands of times, there doesn't have to be a logical explanation for it!

We don't call Superman ManSuper just because ALL his powers are organic.

And if Batman somehow gained powers of a bat instead of using all gadgets, I doubt we'd call him ManBat. (not that I'd want him to gain powers of a Bat, though)

And I personally think the organics make Spider-Man's life a whole lot easier. He has enough problems as it is!

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
I totally agree. 🙂

And not just that, but a Spider-Man movie with an excellent story plot.

And organic webs make about as much sense as laser vision, or claws coming out of a guy's fist.

As I've said thousands of times, there doesn't have to be a logical explanation for it!

We don't call Superman ManSuper just because ALL his powers are organic.

And if Batman somehow gained powers of a bat instead of using all gadgets, I doubt we'd call him ManBat. (not that I'd want him to gain powers of a Bat, though)

And I personally think the organics make Spider-Man's life a whole lot easier. He has enough problems as it is!

One more thing, in Spiderman one, when he came out to wrestle,, the guy goes, whats you're name kid, and peter went the HUMAN SPIDER, and the guy goes, oh that sucks, and called hium Spiderman.

Whats the big deal, in this thread, about Spiderman ?

Originally posted by Superman 24
One more thing, in Spiderman one, when he came out to wrestle,, the guy goes, whats you're name kid, and peter went the HUMAN SPIDER, and the guy goes, oh that sucks, and called hium Spiderman.

Yeah, that part made me laugh.

Originally posted by Cathy X-23
Whats the big deal, in this thread, about Spiderman ?

I don't know. They're just making such a BIG deal out of Spider-Man having organics in the movies. It's ridiculous! They honestly have to pick the smallest things to argue about, when the movie was just excellent with its story. Who cares if he has organics or not, you should be paying more attention to the storyline and the quality.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
I don't know. They're just making such a BIG deal out of Spider-Man having organics in the movies. It's ridiculous! They honestly have to pick the smallest things to argue about, when the movie was just excellent with its story. Who cares if he has organics or not, you should be paying more attention to the storyline and the quality.

So if you have a favorite character, and decide to give him an extra head, but has a good story. Would you mind ?

Originally posted by Batman Wins
So if you have a favorite character, and decide to give him an extra head, but has a good story. Would you mind ?

You do know that's a bad example, right? I mean adding something that wasn't even in a different form in the original story, is different from modifying something that was mechanical in the story, but was changed to organics. so really it's still keeping true to the fact that he could even shoot webs in the first place. growing another head or leg would just be silly, because it's always noticeable. the organic webbing is never noticeable, unless Spider-Man shoots it. so yeah, you just gave me a REALLY BAD example.

Besides, Organic webbing is better than Spider-Man not having webbing at all, as in absolutely no webshooters.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
You do know that's a bad example, right? I mean adding something that wasn't even in a different form in the original story, is different from modifying something that was mechanical in the story, but was changed to organics. so really it's still keeping true to the fact that he could even shoot webs in the first place. growing another head or leg would just be silly, because it's always noticeable. the organic webbing is never noticeable, unless Spider-Man shoots it. so yeah, you just gave me a REALLY BAD example.

Besides, Organic webbing is better than Spider-Man not having webbing at all, as in absolutely no webshooters.

Oh so they find out that Spiderman got his powers from the spider but was really from kripyton, and escaped from supermans cage, but aslong as it gave spiderman powers, its ok ?

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
Dude! IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE HAS ORGANICS!

They could've had Spider-Man come from a different planet, and it would be good as long as the story was good.

You're too wrapped up in the things they changed in the movie to bother with appreciation on how hard they worked on creating the films!

They had excellent story telling and some pretty good actors.

Spider-Man could have absolutely NO powers, and it just be about Peter Parker, and it would still make a wonderful film.

Yet all you care about is that it wasn't true to the comics!

For the last time, No movie is true to their books, and that goes for superhero movies, too.

the books are really just reference points for the movies!

I mean, Lord of the Rings had cut out so many things in their films, and I mean A LOT of stuff was taken out and changed. And look how great that movie was! Same thing with Harry Potter, particularly Prisoner of Azkaban!

The X-Men was pretty far with the comic books, too. And that was pretty good.

Spider-Man was a great movie, and you seem to be too overshadowed by the organics to agree!

I personally think you're going at this all the wrong way! And you can argue about it all you want! But I'm sticking to my opinion!

Thats the biggest lie of the century,It does!!!!!!.while your at it,you might as well say If he has 8 arms it does not matter,sheesh. If the movie is called spiderman then it matters to hell. Now if the movie was titled manspider then organics would be appropriate for the film,but its not the title of ther movie so mechs matter very much in the film. how hard is that to comprehend?🙄 Thats just it,they did NOT work hard at the film,they were too lazy as I have to keep repeating to you to try and put the mechs in the film,AGAIN,this is hollywoood,they could easily have made the mechs work on screen with a competent director and screenwriter which they did not have becuse the story of that film was awful and a joke.that movie was a joke as me,batman wins and other people have tried to spell out to you on this thread. Thats just it.Lord of the rings and the harry potter movies made changes that were reasonable and sensible from the source material,the spiderman movies did not!!!!! how many times do I have to drill that into your head before you can comprehend that?? a thousand times? 🙄 spider-man was a horrible movie as other people have come on here and tried to point that out to you.The story looked like it was written by a five year old. as far as the xmen movies,well I never saw those because I never liked the xmen comics.But thats another example of how hollywood screwed up a comicbook movie with the costumes.I dont care that much that they messed up that movie though since i never liked the xmen comicsAs I said before,tim burton who directed those first two horrible batman movies and Sam Raimi,need to take lessons from Christopher Nolan who directed batman Begins and Richard donner who directed Superman.Those were two great comicbook movies.man-spider was not.

Originally posted by Superman 24
Seriously who cares about organics. I really like it better this way anyway. Who heard of making webbing going that far, and so much that fits in a little thing. Every second he worries about refilling the web. I love the idea that it is organics. The Spiderman movies are good. Be grate full they even made a Spiderman movie, thats very good.

sorry but thousands out there would rather have no spiderman movie made than a phony neautered version like we got and have to get stuck with seeing manspider on the screen.Hopefully unlike rupert,you are capable of being reasoned with and dont ask the same questions over and over and over again when the awnswer was given to you so I will tell you this.while your trying to find faults with mechs,then you got to acknowledge that with organic webbing,instead of the webbing drying in a couple of hours like it did in the comics,organic webbing would be all over the state of new york and would be there for weeks,after all a spiders webbing doesnt dissolve for weeks at times sometimes.also the webbing as some else said earlier,would shoot out of his ass if he had organics, so logically,organics make no sense as well.you try and find faults with the mechs,then for every fault you can come up with for the mechs,i can come up with just as many if not more with organics.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
I don't know. They're just making such a BIG deal out of Spider-Man having organics in the movies. It's ridiculous! They honestly have to pick the smallest things to argue about, when the movie was just excellent with its story. Who cares if he has organics or not, you should be paying more attention to the storyline and the quality.

No they are major things,you just refuse to believe that because all you care about is seeing the name spiderman up on the screen. the movie was not excellent at all,the story was horrible and looked horribly written,with cheesy lines ect,the spider walking off without dying? that spider loves to bite and would have gone off and bitten several people who would have gotten spider powers.again horrible screenwriting and a horrible movie.thats just one example of how this movie is a horrible movie.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
I totally agree. 🙂

And not just that, but a Spider-Man movie with an excellent story plot.

And organic webs make about as much sense as laser vision, or claws coming out of a guy's fist.

As I've said thousands of times, there doesn't have to be a logical explanation for it!

We don't call Superman ManSuper just because ALL his powers are organic.

And if Batman somehow gained powers of a bat instead of using all adgets, I doubt we'd call him ManBat. (not that I'd want him to gain powers of a Bat, though)

And I personally think the organics make Spider-Man's life a whole lot easier. He has enough problems as it is!

Thats just it,the movie had a horrible story plot as I just pointed out.

no organics DONT make sense because AGAIN,the webbing would realistically have to shoot out of his ass,thats a huge flaw with organics.Well thats because you dont relate to peter parker very well obviously.I like the fact that it would give him more problems because thats what always made him unique as a character because he had so many problems to deal with unlike other superheros,so thanks for helping me to prove to you why organics are a horrible idea. 😆 😆

Everybody in this thread is stubborn.

Anybody who argues with Mr. Parker is wasting there time and vice versa, for no one is going to change their opinion on this.

A handful of people think that organics in the Spider-Man movies is disgusting and outrageous, and the rest of the population thinks that it was okay and tolerable.

End. Of. Story.

Keep the peace, people.

Wow, Mr. Parker, this shows how much of a liar you are! You told everyone on so many other threads that you stopped reading my rantings, but from all the posts I just read, you do listen! And by the way, Spider-Man did have changes that were necessary. And it turned out to be excellent. And there were a lot of things in Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings that weren't necessary, But I'm not upset about it. And I believe I might have said this before, But sometimes it's better that they didn't stay close to the comics, because it just wouldn't look right in the movies. And Spider-Man was one of those movies. And if you didn't notice, Superman dragged on, and got rather boring after a while. It was like you could only watch it once. Now don't get me wrong, I like the Superman movies. I just can't stand sitting through all of it. But I do believe it's a classic. It's not like Superman making time go backwards by making the earth's rotation made as much sense as Spider-Man shooting webs out of his hands. And yes, Batman Begins was an excellent movie. It was better than Superman and the older Batmans.But you don't seem to have the best taste in movies. You probably hate classic movies like the Godfather or Indiana Jones. And have you ever even seen or read Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter? But trust me, Spider-Man's been considered one of the greatest Superhero movies of all time, meaning it's up there with Superman and Batman movies. but you probably lost track of what was going on in the movie, because of your oversensativity to the fact that he has organics, and for all any of us could know, you might really actually like the movie and you could be contrary. trust me, I have a cousin who's like that, and dislikes what everyone else likes. I don't understand what your problem with the changes are, because I know a lot of Hard core Spider-Man fans who love the Spider-Man movies who could care less that Spider-Man has organics. They just enjoy the fact that their favorite wallcrawler is on the big screen! I have a father who loved to read Spider-Man comics, along with Superman. He liked Superman better than Spider-Man in the comics, but He thought Spider-Man is a lot better movie than Superman movies. And my Uncle collects thousands of comic books, and has every issue of Spider-Man. He knows the quality of Superheroes, And he thought Spider-Man was an excellent movie, and didn't mind the fact of the organics. And even my mom, who dislikes Superhero movies, all togetther, thought Spider-Man was an amazing movie. I mean think about it, Spider-Man didn't only make comicbook fans enjoy it, but even people who were never trully familiar with the Superhero loved it. And since I know none of this will make you listen, and since you never "Pay Attention" to my post, I'll stop arguing.

And you better listen to that last par, this time, Mr.Parker, Because every time I tell you to stop arguing with me, you deliberately continue to do so!

Originally posted by munkiesarus
Everybody in this thread is stubborn.

Anybody who argues with Mr. Parker is wasting there time and vice versa, for no one is going to change their opinion on this.

A handful of people think that organics in the Spider-Man movies is disgusting and outrageous, and the rest of the population thinks that it was okay and tolerable.

End. Of. Story.

A handful. That's not a lot, is it?

I think he likes you 😉 and wants you're attention.

Anyway Mr.Parker they said they couldn't call the movie manspider, because, it doesn't sound right.
Human Spider...try watching the movie first, because I don't think you watched it.

Ultimate Spiderman in the comics, kind of made me mad when they made venom, some suit thing made from his father, but the stories were still good.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
A handful. That's not a lot, is it?

No, it's not.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
Wow, Mr. Parker, this shows how much of a liar you are! You told everyone on so many other threads that you stopped reading my rantings, but from all the posts I just read, you do listen! And by the way, Spider-Man did have changes that were necessary. And it turned out to be excellent. And there were a lot of things in Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings that weren't necessary, But I'm not upset about it. And I believe I might have said this before, But sometimes it's better that they didn't stay close to the comics, because it just wouldn't look right in the movies. And Spider-Man was one of those movies. And if you didn't notice, Superman dragged on, and got rather boring after a while. It was like you could only watch it once. Now don't get me wrong, I like the Superman movies. I just can't stand sitting through all of it. But I do believe it's a classic. It's not like Superman making time go backwards by making the earth's rotation made as much sense as Spider-Man shooting webs out of his hands. And yes, Batman Begins was an excellent movie. It was better than Superman and the older Batmans.But you don't seem to have the best taste in movies. You probably hate classic movies like the Godfather or Indiana Jones. And have you ever even seen or read Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter? But trust me, Spider-Man's been considered one of the greatest Superhero movies of all time, meaning it's up there with Superman and Batman movies. but you probably lost track of what was going on in the movie, because of your oversensativity to the fact that he has organics, and for all any of us could know, you might really actually like the movie and you could be contrary. trust me, I have a cousin who's like that, and dislikes what everyone else likes. I don't understand what your problem with the changes are, because I know a lot of Hard core Spider-Man fans who love the Spider-Man movies who could care less that Spider-Man has organics. They just enjoy the fact that their favorite wallcrawler is on the big screen! I have a father who loved to read Spider-Man comics, along with Superman. He liked Superman better than Spider-Man in the comics, but He thought Spider-Man is a lot better movie than Superman movies. And my Uncle collects thousands of comic books, and has every issue of Spider-Man. He knows the quality of Superheroes, And he thought Spider-Man was an excellent movie, and didn't mind the fact of the organics. And even my mom, who dislikes Superhero movies, all togetther, thought Spider-Man was an amazing movie. I mean think about it, Spider-Man didn't only make comicbook fans enjoy it, but even people who were never trully familiar with the Superhero loved it. And since I know none of this will make you listen, and since you never "Pay Attention" to my post, I'll stop arguing.

And you better listen to that last par, this time, Mr.Parker, Because every time I tell you to stop arguing with me, you deliberately continue to do so!

Press the enter key. I'm not even reading that, it's too much for one sitting.

Originally posted by Superman 24
I think he likes you 😉 and wants you're attention.

Anyway Mr.Parker they said they couldn't call the movie manspider, because, it doesn't sound right.
Human Spider...try watching the movie first, because I don't think you watched it.

Ultimate Spiderman in the comics, kind of made me mad when they made venom, some suit thing made from his father, but the stories were still good.

You wouldn't be reffering to me, would you?