Mother of Slain Soldier Delivers Powerful Speech Against Bush

Originally posted by ShotgunWes
If drugs were legalized then you would have even more crack babies and welfare mothers. We waste enough money on the freeloaders who just have kids so they can get more money to get more drugs. Think about that before you spout useless shit.

I disagree, I don't think we would have any more drug addicts. Plus we waste way more money trying to catch everyone involved with illegal drugs than we do on people with welfare... Not only that, but the people on welfare because they can't work because they're busy being stoned are arrested too.

What I meant by irrelevant (ooh big word) was that the drugs had nothing to do with the original topic. You sounded like Bill O'Reilly with ADD when you said that.

Don't even get me started on the gay part.

What the hell are you talking about? Did you just say that if drugs were legalized that we would have no more drug addicts?

😆

That has to be the stupidest thing I have ever heard. If it's legal then people are going to think that it is safe to use, but then they'll get addicted and their lives will fall apart and they will tuyrn into freeloading junkies. And for the record we spend way more on welfare than we do on the illegal drug trade. That goes to show taht you have no idea what you are talking about.

how did we get from a mother's son killed in iraq to the legalisation of pot????? i'm all for legalising weed, but ffs what about the topic?? 😖

Originally posted by ShotgunWes
What the hell are you talking about? Did you just say that if drugs were legalized that we would have no more drug addicts?

😆

That has to be the stupidest thing I have ever heard. If it's legal then people are going to think that it is safe to use, but then they'll get addicted and their lives will fall apart and they will tuyrn into freeloading junkies. And for the record we spend way more on welfare than we do on the illegal drug trade. That goes to show taht you have no idea what you are talking about.

No, I said that we wouldn't have any more than we have now. I sort of figured you would connect the dots there between my previous post (where I also clearly implied that there would still be drug addicts). Yes, we spend more money on welfare than catching druggies, but we don't spend more on welfare for druggies specifically than for catching them.

Originally posted by PVS
how did we get from a mother's son killed in iraq to the legalisation of pot????? i'm all for legalising weed, but ffs what about the topic?? 😖

ShotgunWes thought it would be cute if he claimed that all Democrats wanted you to smoke pot... And I couldn't help myself. Sorry. I'll stop. 😮

Originally posted by PVS
how did we get from a mother's son killed in iraq to the legalisation of pot????? i'm all for legalising weed, but ffs what about the topic?? 😖

I've pointed out three times that this is completely off topic, PVS ✅ I've also been ignored each time.

And yet you also keep posting continuing the discussion under the "I said it was off topic but had to reply" ploy.
And Darth Revan maybe you should learn to read because I never said Dems wanted you to smoke weed so stop spoutting off bullshit and do something with your life.

ah, so this is the old immature lameass "derail the thread because i dont like the topic" shtick...huh? weak dude.....realy weak 😬

Actually...

Originally posted by ShotgunWes
If the democrats had their way we'd all be gay and doing drugs. Long live Bush!!!

You didn't specifically say weed, but it was pretty close 😬

Tricky there, trying to catch me on a meaningless technicality detective

TEH OMGZORZ, I WIN TH EARGUMENT!!!

Originally posted by KidRock
"Since her son's death, Sheehan has made opposition to the Bush administration a full-time job."

I wonder why she only started once her son died. Were all the other soldiers lives not important to her?

The thing to remember is that none of them were important to Bush. None of the Iraqi innocent people were important to Bush. Stopping Bin Laden wasn't important to Bush.

Nothing is important to Bush, BUT Bush.

The US media need to stop focusing on celebrity lifestyles (Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan etc) and just start figuring out why Bush is still running the country.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Nothing is important to Bush, BUT Bush.

...and all the powerful friends of bush. dont leave them out. he is at least loyal to SOME people. unfortunately not to 'the people'

Originally posted by PVS
he is at least loyal to SOME people.

Only because they keep him in office, if they didn't he'd f*ck them too.

The US media need to stop focusing on celebrity lifestyles (Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan etc) and just start figuring out why Bush is still running the country.

A-****ing-men.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Awe, the excuse of mental instability, often used to excuse one of radical opinions, incidirary comments and to absolve one of the responsibiliyt of their actions. Touche'. Well played.

The US media need to stop focusing on celebrity lifestyles (Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan etc) and just start figuring out why Bush is still running the country.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I have the same condition, you know...not mentally unstable per se, but mentally handicapped.

And yet I have never heard you use it as an excuse for any of your behaviour. See what I am getting at?

And I think, that in most cases, there is a difference between a handicap and an unstability.

Originally posted by Lana
A-****ing-men.

slipping a profanity into a biblical word?

someone's goin to hell 😛

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
The US media need to stop focusing on celebrity lifestyles (Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan etc) and just start figuring out why Bush is still running the country.-AC

Bush is still running the country because 51% of the voting population elected him as their president. But while they're at it, can the media figure out why Clinton was allowed to run this country for 8 years?

Originally posted by PVS
slipping a profanity into a biblical word?

someone's goin to hell 😛

Bite me 😛

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
Bush is still running the country because 51% of the voting population elected him as their president. But while they're at it, can the media figure out why Clinton was allowed to run this country for 8 years?

Did Clinton declare war under a falsehood? No. He actually was one of the better presidents this country has had, and even managed to eliminate the deficit.

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
Bush is still running the country because 51% of the voting population elected him as their president. But while they're at it, can the media figure out why Clinton was allowed to run this country for 8 years?

You should be glad that Clinton was president , who else would the Bush administration have to blame for all the things that they have screwed up since they took over.

First off, who's to say that the information that started the Iraq war was false. Just because they didn't find WMD in Iraq doesn't mean that they are not there. A nuke is only 14 ft long and I'm sure that it couldn't be that hard to hide in the middle of the desert. But at the same time if we had let Saddam continue his regime more people could have died. Saddam tortured his own people, so this war is not for nothing. Think about the women over there who were treated as 3rd class citizens and the men who were forced to join the military. It's not all about WMD. Also Clinton was not one of the greatest presidents. He was good and that's it. Bush is a better Prez.