Are you the fastest person you know in your age group? this is just a question of wonderyes im an ex soldier so Im pretty fit
And you still haven't answered the important questions...the importanc is in what Ive seen and what I experienced, and without braging I doubt that many havent seen and experienced as much I have due to my military enngangement
Originally posted by Atlantis001
damint ! How do I attach a Image !?I´m not getting excited !! shocking
To attach image just click on it to enlarge it, then right click on it and save pic as in your file....should do it.
I know you just want to hang her on the wall though...She is a sweety...She has that special look..... 😄
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Wow this is so incredibly flawed...
Plant's do not "breathe in CO2" and "breathe out oxygen", (the anthropomorphism is semantically wrong too as plants do not breathe in the sense you seem to be implying at all) oxygen is a byproduct of photosynthetic production of glucose, plant's still undergo respiration that requires oxygen.The early earth atmosphere consisted of predominantly CO2, H2O and N2, as well as some gaseous sulfur compounds. According to evolution organisms capable of photosynthetic reactions evolved first. Humans and apes did not appear billions of years ago. Homo sapiens sapiens only date back around 200 thousand years.
How can you argue against scientific concepts when you lack even a rudimentary knowledge or understanding of said scientific concepts?
Ok then, you've proved me wrong on that case, yet still noone has given me a true reason why there should be no god. And things that have been believed to happen but still have no specific proof aren't the point here, so why learn about things that usually have no proof to them?
You'll figure out what i mean:
Christians= God = Kindness, generousness etc = everyone's happy
Non-Christians = No God = Nothing specific= Theft, murder, greed etc = Sadness and poverty
There's no specific reason to be here, so everyone has to be under threat of bad seeds? What's so realistic of that? It means everything in life has to be bad to exist, are you getting the link? We evolved from monkeys(bad, low self esteem(bad)) so it has to exist, that is according to you.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
You'll figure out what i mean:Christians= God = Kindness, generousness etc = everyone's happy
Non-Christians = No God = Nothing specific= Theft, murder, greed etc = Sadness and poverty.
I believe in God.....Non-Christians thing is not true at all......no it doesn't equal those things....
Christians can be just as sinful and lustful and wrong...and yet still condemn....It's how you live your life...Not the title you place on it.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
Christians= God = Kindness, generousness etc = everyone's happy
Non-Christians = No God = Nothing specific= Theft, murder, greed etc = Sadness and poverty
I not a christian but I´m never commited theft, and murder mmm....
just kidding !!! *evil laugh* 😈
Personally, I think that the way people behave is not too much dependent of their religion. You can be a good person independendly of your religion. Think of someone that could not have acess to christianianity, like every human being before year 0 a.c. So they are doomed to be evil, just because a determined culture didn´t reached them. If things were this way, there will be not so many differences between christianity and nazism, which is something that I would like to be false.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
Ok then, you've proved me wrong on that case, yet still noone has given me a true reason why there should be no god. And things that have been believed to happen but still have no specific proof aren't the point here, so why learn about things that usually have no proof to them?You'll figure out what i mean:
Christians= God = Kindness, generousness etc = everyone's happy
Non-Christians = No God = Nothing specific= Theft, murder, greed etc = Sadness and povertyThere's no specific reason to be here, so everyone has to be under threat of bad seeds? What's so realistic of that? It means everything in life has to be bad to exist, are you getting the link? We evolved from monkeys(bad, low self esteem(bad)) so it has to exist, that is according to you.
You do not believe in the existence of leprechauns because there is no evidence that leprechauns exist; this belief cannot be substantiated and therefore, suffers from subverted support. It is for this reason, that others do not believe in the existence of god.
In the words of Stephen Roberts, "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
Furthermore, ethical behavior has nothing to do with the existence of god.
"I refuse to be labeled immoral merely because I am godless," Peter Walker.
"There seems to be a terrible misunderstanding on the part of a great many people to the effect that when you cease to believe you may cease to behave," Louis Kronenberger.
"There were honest people long before there were Christians and there are, God be praised, still honest people where there are no Christians. It could therefore easily be possible that people are Christians because true Christianity corresponds to what they would have been even if Christianity did not exist," G.C. Lichtenberg.
I think it's very noble of some of you to herald the torch of science and reason. But many of the minds here are just too tiny to comprehend empirical proof. They are afraid to let go of the supersitions of their fathers. Their reasoning is based on NOT reasoning. Take heart though, they will be slaughtered in the coming Apocalypse along with the Islamists. Then we can live in peace with the Buddist and the Hindu. 🍺 🍺 🍺 🍺 🍺 🍺 🍺
Originally posted by Mr. Charlie
I think it's very noble of some of you to herald the torch of science and reason. But many of the minds here are just too tiny to comprehend empirical proof. They are afraid to let go of the supersitions of their fathers. Their reasoning is based on NOT reasoning. Take heart though, they will be slaughtered in the coming Apocalypse along with the Islamists. Then we can live in peace with the Buddist and the Hindu. 🍺 🍺 🍺 🍺 🍺 🍺 🍺
With people like you around, it will make it so much more satisfying when that verse about every knee bowing comes true.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
Christians= God = Kindness, generousness etc = everyone's happy
Non-Christians = No God = Nothing specific= Theft, murder, greed etc = Sadness and poverty
I'm an agnostic so I guess I'll just go out and rape, pillage and kill?
Spanish Inquisition.
Salem witch trials.
The Crusades.
Catholic Church silence during the Holocaust.
Catholic Church sex scandals.
Everyone's happy right?
How incredibly arrogant of you to assume you are a better person than someone who does not share your beliefs. Isn't pride one of those cardinal sins? 😉
So what's the proof of the Hamurabis laws thensince you clearly didn't get it the last time I wrote it. They know Hammurabi to have been a real person due to records of his reign of the first dynasty of Babylon, at that time they were well into storing the records that was chipped into clay tablets.
Originally posted by Chibi Boyagain a great display of ignorant arrogance
Christians= God = Kindness, generousness etc = everyone's happy
Non-Christians = No God = Nothing specific= Theft, murder, greed etc = Sadness and poverty
Originally posted by finti
since you clearly didn't get it the last time I wrote it. They know Hammurabi to have been a real person due to records of his reign of the first dynasty of Babylon, at that time they were well into storing the records that was chipped into clay tablets.
The laws of Hammurabi was carved on a large stone for public view, this stone was found in 1902. So you can say they found the original law transcript, it is the same as if they had found the stone tablets of the 10 commandments, Ark of the Covenant. Noah's Ark. Moses bodyagain a great display of ignorant arrogance
1. is this supposed to mean that the findings of the Ark are just as likely as the findings of the laws?
2. It ain't arrogance, it's called stating a fact, there's a difference.
Originally posted by DarkCrawler
There are more christian criminals then atheist ones...
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I'm an agnostic so I guess I'll just go out and rape, pillage and kill?Spanish Inquisition.
Salem witch trials.
The Crusades.
Catholic Church silence during the Holocaust.
Catholic Church sex scandals.Everyone's happy right?
How incredibly arrogant of you to assume you are a better person than someone who does not share your beliefs. Isn't pride one of those cardinal sins? 😉
I must agree though, there are demons who believe in god yet they are bad, but I wouldn't count them as christians. ( 😂 ) And just because one doesn't believe in god doesn't mean that I should criticise them for a few different people. And how could you criticise normal christians for the catholics mistakes when some of those who aren't christian rape and murder etc?
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
Trying to spread the word of god isn't pride. Even god knows that sometimes you need certain things to tell people the hard facts. Also, as i said before, it ain't arrogance, it's stating a fact. It ain't pride either, it's trying to tell someone something when they won't listen any other way.
In this comment:
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
Christians= God = Kindness, generousness etc = everyone's happy
Non-Christians = No God = Nothing specific= Theft, murder, greed etc = Sadness and poverty
You stated your opinion that all Christians equal kindness and generosity and all non-Christians equal thieves, murderers and greedy bastards. It's not a fact it's a baseless generalisation. Imo spouting and claiming your opinion as fact is a display of arrogance. And the implication that you believe that you are better than others that do not share your beliefs, purely because they do not share your beliefs also is arrogance. Though perhaps your definition of arrogance differs from the generally accepted definition as much as your perception of science.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
I said that it just so happens that people who don't believe in god seem to do more damage because there's nobody to stop them in their eyes. Murder isn't allowed in the Bible, it's clear that people didn't have a clue what they were on about in them days, the bible says that demons believe in god, just because one believes in god doesn't mean one is good.
I missed the part where you took a worldwide census to determine the demographics of those who are law abiding and those who commit crimes. Again these are your opinions not facts. People commit crimes because they don't believe in God? In my opinion that is complete nonsense. Or people commit crimes because of a wide range and combination of economic, cultural, personality, genetic, environmental and sociological factors. In my opinion this is far more likely.
I am not religious but I don't need "the fear of God" to prevent me from committing crimes. I couldn't give a flying f*ck whether or not a book says do something or don't. Christianity does not have a monopoly on ethics. I was raised well enough to have my own personal intrinsic sense of what is ethical. I don't assume that my ethical beliefs are identical or superior to anyone else's, and I would never impose my ethical beliefs on someone else. I abide by the laws legislated by my elected parliament and administered by the judiciary and law enforcement, because I believe that doing so is correct.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
I must agree though, there are demons who believe in god yet they are bad, but I wouldn't count them as christians. ( 😂 ) And just because one doesn't believe in god doesn't mean that I should criticise them for a few different people. And how could you criticise normal christians for the catholics mistakes when some of those who aren't christian rape and murder etc?
Face facts. Those acts I listed were performed, sometime with god as the cause, by people who fully believed in "the word of god". I wasn't making a prejudice opinion against all Christians based on the acts of a few, I was simply offering up some prominent examples of the "kindness" and "generosity" (N.B. sarcasm) of some Christians to diminish your flawed and prejudicial statement of opinion that all Christians are kind and generous while all the world's problems are caused by non-Christians. I'm well aware that people are individuals and the world is many shades of grey. People cannot be divided into two groups as good and bad purely on whether or not they believe in your specific god.