Originally posted by xmarksthespotYou'd have to reevaluate your evidence, which changes your conclusion. But yes, that's why I said it was a semantics argument.
I have to rephrase real world physics does not apply, logic is logic real world or comic and it should still apply. Something that is completely illogical happening just equals bad writing.
Your conclusion would have to be different, as different evidence is now valid, and different evidence is now invalid. Inductive reasoning cannot be used the same either as the outcome is different. It's like changing to base 8 when used to using base 10.
Or converting from English to Metric. The numbers mean different things.
Originally posted by xmarksthespotAnd who determines this? Who determines what the characters "core abilities" are?
I actually meant the character profile in terms of a what the character's core abilities are, not actual written profiles.
Originally posted by xmarksthespotActually its the little things that are overlooked. if Wolverine's healing factor wasn't a bit quicker then wouldn't he die from the first time he popped his claws? Because despite the way it was explained you don't "keep the channels clear like peirced ears" as the hands are not like ears.
Wolverine's would be a (badly defined) healing factor,
Originally posted by EvilCap AmericaWithout plot devices? I dont' think so. Otherwise Wolverine stabbed thanos with bone claws.
I should have started arguing "Spiderman has enough strength to take out class 100+ guys like Firelord or Superman" in that case.
Originally posted by EvilCap AmericaYour fanboyism is screaming at me: WOLVERINE MUST BE USED AT HIS WEAKEST, SPIDERMAN MUST BE ENHANCED OR ELSE IT IS PIS/CIS!
So when this defense is used we might get him at normal levels instead of being turned into a slightly acrobatic nobody that cant take out a normal human who heals fast who eventually turns into a guy that takes 100+strength level hits and moves faster than quicksilver