Originally posted by TwisterGameX
Are you guys joking......Goku has Instant transmission, and fought like that with metal kooler, so Superman can't even see him. Can Superman blow up planets....
Again it's a teleport move, and has to lock onto someones energy to use it. Yes Superman can blow up planets with his heat vision, and he's also much stronger, faster, more durable, and has way better stamina. He's physically more powerful.
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss:Laugh:
the kamehameha isn't suppose to blow up planets... in one episode goku clearly says " Don't put that much energy into it, it will blow up the planet..." so hes holding back on his energy so that if he does miss, it only blows up a mountain...(which is still more then supes eye lasers can do, without him flying off to outerspace) If goku put more energy into the kame, it would take out the earth...Supes can't reach lightspeed in the earths atmosphere, his comics have stipulated that in his world he would cause problems... Goku on the otherhand has never caused any problems when using IT in earths atmosphere.... Advantage Goku....
Unfortuantly I don't collect supes comics... anyone know where I can get scans???
That proves it right there.
"Goku's attack doesn't blow up planets, because he holds back, if he didn't hold back it'd blow the planet up!
Superman holds back so Goku wins."
Do you even listen to yourself? You're talking about times when both character holds back, and yet Goku doesn't need to hold back, and Superman holding back is an advatage for Goku. 🙄
So your argument is once again "Lets handicap Superman so Goku can win!"
Originally posted by Blue DragonGreat coolness argument. 🙄
Goku of course! He's a sayian! Superman hasn't a chance!
Originally posted by TheQuincyYeah, I'm the one that's debating logically with evidence to back up my claims, and I'M the fanboy.
Thank You Blue Dragon. Creshosk is being a rabid fan boy, obsessed with his superman. Goku could punch him once and Superman is dead.
I'm not the one that just went
"G0KYU IZ TEH UB3R1337 Z4Y@N! 50 IZ 1 PIN(H IZ TEH D34TH!!!!!!1!!!1!!1!1!11!elevinty one!"
You have yet to prove that Goku has the strength output to rival that of a black hole. let alone a double or micro black hole. 🙂
Oh but I guess you don't need proof when you can just call the other person a fanboy and make a fanboyesque statement. . .
Originally posted by TheQuincyThat's up to you to find something that is according to some, infinite gravity due to infinite mass, and a double black hole is twice infinity, and a micro black whole is even more than that. . .
OMFG, what to you is equivalent to a black hole? I will find it, and shut u up.
But of course infinite gravity is really a weird thing to say, particularly 2*∞ and X>2*∞
But hey infinity must be a small number since you can have double and greater than double infinity right?
Anyway, it's not up to me to do your work for you. You need to show something that would be comparable to a double black hole feat. 🙂
Originally posted by Hoshi"And it's already proven that Goku isn't as strong as a real human. . ."
it is already proven that the black hole which superman scaped wasnt as strong as a real one.
You haven't proven anything, certainly not using your flawed scientific theory.
Originally posted by EvilCap AmericaProve it. 🙂
Superman gets KOed by a machine gun and cant lift a mailbox
Originally posted by CreshoskYeah, I'm the one that's debating logically with evidence to back up my claims, and I'M the fanboy.
Creshok, you are dillusional. Saying Proove it to every argument is not logical.
Look at yourself kid.
Here creshock, i cant say this any clearer. Whats this rule you created again? "Akira didnt make it so its not canon?" And the funniest part is you pulled some japanese comic rule out of your rectus. You just defeated yourself, you are you own counterargument. You literally, have no clue what you are talking about. Rule system? get real kid. You are dillusional, caught up in your own superman fanhood, and creshock, you are the only "fanboy" here. Im not kidding, you are blind, kid, maybe by supermans heat rays.
" The final episode of the Dragon Ball series ends with flash back to Dragon Ball, Dragon Ball Z, and Dragon Ball GT's most memorible moments. "
Why would this be the case of GT was not a part of the storyline?
First off, Goku doesnt need his Final glory to crush superman, but you clearly refuse to believe it, and thats fine, some people just dont like losing arguments. Cool! Please, dont question my knowledge, kid.
After Dragonaball Z had ended TOEI Animation asked permission from Toriyama to continue the Dragonball trilogy with a new series called Dragonball GT. This new series aired in Japan from 1996 to 1997, and was no where near as successful. Toriyama was not directly involved with Dragonball GT, but he did supervise the development.
Man.. Thats pertty. clear.
Now Creshok, if you still dont believe its canon, you can also not believe gravity is real, that you can breathe underwater, outerspace, subspace, can time travel, and anything else your mind can think of. Im sorry creshok, Superman is destroyed with or without GT status goku. This is like beating a dead horse. Continue to fight 50-1 arguments man, you have lost your mind. Sure, "numbers dont matter" as you said, but facts do. Sorry. must be some sort of jedi mind trick.
In court, when the judge rules 9-1, the ones voice unfortunatley doesnt count. you lose. Maybe you will come to this realization tommrow, the next day, or, in the most probably case
never.
Trashiest.Argument.Ever.
But it know its not over, you will unquestionably think of something more ludicris. I cant wait to read it. Ill get my lotion out.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555
Creshok, you are dillusional. Saying Proove it to every argument is not logical.Look at yourself kid.
Here creshock, i cant say this any clearer. Whats this rule you created again? "Akira didnt make it so its not canon?" And the funniest part is you pulled some japanese comic rule out of your rectus. You just defeated yourself, you are you own counterargument. You literally, have no clue what you are talking about. Rule system? get real kid. You are dillusional, caught up in your own superman fanhood, and creshock, you are the only "fanboy" here. Im not kidding, you are blind, kid, maybe by supermans heat rays.
" The final episode of the Dragon Ball series ends with flash back to Dragon Ball, Dragon Ball Z, and Dragon Ball GT's most memorible moments. "
Why would this be the case of GT was not a part of the storyline?First off, Goku doesnt need his Final glory to crush superman, but you clearly refuse to believe it, and thats fine, some people just dont like losing arguments. Cool! Please, dont question my knowledge, kid.
After Dragonaball Z had ended TOEI Animation asked permission from Toriyama to continue the Dragonball [b]trilogy
with a new series called Dragonball GT. This new series aired in Japan from 1996 to 1997, and was no where near as successful. Toriyama was not directly involved with Dragonball GT, but he did supervise the development.Man.. Thats pertty. clear.
Now Creshok, if you still dont believe its canon, you can also not believe gravity is real, that you can breathe underwater, outerspace, subspace, can time travel, and anything else your mind can think of. Im sorry creshok, Superman is destroyed with or without GT status goku. This is like beating a dead horse. Continue to fight 50-1 arguments man, you have lost your mind. Sure, "numbers dont matter" as you said, but facts do. Sorry. must be some sort of jedi mind trick.
In court, when the judge rules 9-1, the ones voice unfortunatley doesnt count. you lose. Maybe you will come to this realization tommrow, the next day, or, in the most probably case
never.Trashiest.Argument.Ever.
But it know its not over, you will unquestionably think of something more ludicris. I cant wait to read it. Ill get my lotion out. [/B]
And I'm sorry but ssj3/4 Goku in just a few seconds. And GT is part of the stroy line, but people don't seem to like the GT series. Either way though, Goku loses. 🙂 Superman is faster, stronger, more durable, and has way better stamina.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Oh, right. Unsubstantiated claims without evidence or proof backing them up is more logical. . That's why Black holes are real. . . right. . . Hey, I've got some land I want to sell you. . .
Creshok, you are dillusional. Saying Proove it to every argument is not logical.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555How old are you?
Look at yourself kid.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Not at all. If you knew the laws about publishing things, you'd know that they are different in the US as opposed to Japan.
Here creshock, i cant say this any clearer. Whats this rule you created again? "Akira didnt make it so its not canon?"[/auote] That's the way it works in Japan.[QUOTE=4988437]Originally posted by ExtraMision5555
And the funniest part is you pulled some japanese comic rule out of your rectus.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Like proof is illogical?
You just defeated yourself, you are you own counterargument. You literally, have no clue what you are talking about.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Right because unsubstantiated claims are more logical.
Rule system? get real kid. You are dillusional, caught up in your own superman fanhood,
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Hate to break it to you bud, but I'm not the one that claims that "no proof is logical".
and creshock, you are the only "fanboy" here. Im not kidding, you are blind, kid, maybe by supermans heat rays.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555And?
" The final episode of the Dragon Ball series ends with flash back to Dragon Ball, Dragon Ball Z, and Dragon Ball GT's most memorible moments. "
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Why does another person assembling things about something make it canon?
Why would this be the case of GT was not a part of the storyline?
I can go to Japan and make a dojinshi, get it published and have Goku being beaten bya single blade of grass, and it'll become canon?
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Well, I'd ask for proof, but appearenltly evidence is illogical.
First off, Goku doesnt need his Final glory to crush superman, but you clearly refuse to believe it,
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Oh so that's why you said that proof is illogical. . .
and thats fine, some people just dont like losing arguments.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555I have to because you make ridiculous claims that go against the truth.
Cool! Please, dont question my knowledge, kid.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Absolutley. . .
After Dragonaball Z had ended TOEI Animation asked permission from Toriyama to continue the Dragonball [b]trilogy with a new series called Dragonball GT. This new series aired in Japan from 1996 to 1997, and was no where near as successful. Toriyama was not directly involved with Dragonball GT, but he did supervise the development.Man.. Thats pertty. clear.[/b]
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Why I have evidence of gravity. . . oh wait, evidence is illogical. . .
Now Creshok, if you still dont believe its canon, you can also not believe gravity is real,
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Yup because yoou don't need evidence of this, since evidence is illogical.
that you can breathe underwater, outerspace, subspace, can time travel, and anything else your mind can think of.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Like proof is illogical?
Im sorry creshok, Superman is destroyed with or without GT status goku. This is like beating a dead horse. Continue to fight 50-1 arguments man, you have lost your mind. Sure, "numbers dont matter" as you said, but facts do. Sorry. must be some sort of jedi mind trick.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555And how does he decide which way to rule?
In court, when the judge rules 9-1, the ones voice unfortunatley doesnt count. you lose.
Oh yes, illogical evidence. . .
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555Has got to be the escapist "Asking for proof is illogical."
Maybe you will come to this realization tommrow, the next day, or, in the most probably case
[B]never.Trashiest.Argument.Ever.[/b]
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555I can't think of anything more ludicruos than "Asking for proof is illogical."
But it know its not over, you will unquestionably think of something more ludicris. I cant wait to read it. Ill get my lotion out.
So, I'm a fanboy for asking for evidence, backing up my claims, and making statements based on the evidence given by both sides. . .
You're not a fanboy for discarding evidence, refusing to provide evidence, saying that proof is illogical, and simply stating that one or the other would win regardless of evidence?
Damn, I guess a fanboy is someone whos level headed, logical and well thought out. . .
cresh.... You in a world of your own... I think you know your wrong, but just like trying to win a debate..
lets look at the facts....
Black hole.... Is a theory(acording to you)..Theres loads of proof for them.... so how is superman escaping it is a feat???
Gravity....Is a theory...Theres no proof of how it works... Only that one atom is drawn towards another...but gravity is cannon????
Originally posted by Creshosk
Oh, right. Unsubstantiated claims without evidence or proof backing them up is more logical. . That's why Black holes are real. . . right. . . Hey, I've got some land I want to sell you. . .How old are you?
Not at all. If you knew the laws about publishing things, you'd know that they are different in the US as opposed to Japan.
Like proof is illogical?
Right because unsubstantiated claims are more logical.
Hate to break it to you bud, but I'm not the one that claims that "no proof is logical".
And?
Why does another person assembling things about something make it canon?
I can go to Japan and make a dojinshi, get it published and have Goku being beaten bya single blade of grass, and it'll become canon?
Well, I'd ask for proof, but appearenltly evidence is illogical.
Oh so that's why you said that proof is illogical. . .
I have to because you make ridiculous claims that go against the truth.
Absolutley. . .
Why I have evidence of gravity. . . oh wait, evidence is illogical. . .
Yup because yoou don't need evidence of this, since evidence is illogical.
Like proof is illogical?
And how does he decide which way to rule?
Oh yes, illogical evidence. . .
Has got to be the escapist "Asking for proof is illogical."
I can't think of anything more ludicruos than "Asking for proof is illogical."
So, I'm a fanboy for asking for evidence, backing up my claims, and making statements based on the evidence given by both sides. . .
You're not a fanboy for discarding evidence, refusing to provide evidence, saying that proof is illogical, and simply stating that one or the other would win regardless of evidence?
Damn, I guess a fanboy is someone whos level headed, logical and well thought out. . .
supervise - To have the charge and direction of; superintend.
watch and direct; "Who is overseeing this project?": keep tabs on; keep an eye on; keep under surveillance
If akira toriyama didnt like the way the project was going (in this case, if he didnt like the storyline according to his universe), he would have, and at sometime durring the creation of dragonball GT, more than likely did do just that. Highlighting my sentence in red only strengthened my point. Reading the next sentence also helps.
Just becasue toriyamas literally hand holding a pen didnt touch the paper to write the story throws it out? Dont be silly. Ive substained all of my claims, Putting logic behind them. Please dont put words in my mouth, i dont like the taste.
And your finest sentence :
"Not at all. If you knew the laws about publishing things, you'd know that they are different in the US as opposed to Japan."
Im convinced you dont read what you write. Since when do laws govern whether show is canon to its universe or not? I didnt know that law existed. Must be in the constitoonsion.
Sorry for the pun. Lol.
Almost as silly as your claim.