Help Me Understand.......Multiple Sexuality

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why are you continually talking of misunderstanding when you are the one who can't grasp the fact that all I was saying (to which you agreed) was that regardless of influence, it's not foregone that bisexuals are more prone to lesbianism as you would like to claim. Relationship involved, or not.

1. Because when it all started we had one small misunderstanding, but cleared that up, then you went on contradicting yourself without even attempting to admit to that. You're trying to mix two things (societal influence and inherent influence) into one, and that's impossible. It's like banging a cube and a sphere together to try to get them to mold together.

2. Taking the relationship out of the equation is another way of saying "I don't wanna discuss that anymore, because i can't fight it"

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
We both know they don't, nor were they intended to. So lets move on.

they might though 🙁

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
So you believe, in all honesty, relationship or not, that any bisexual is more prone to lesbianism? No bisexual can actually be just bi? Even WITH being in a relationship? I'm asking, not assuming.

IF we go by the societal influence principle, then yes. If NOT, then no. You initially used the NOT version, then switched to the YES version. That's why you're contradicting yourself.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I haven't though. I've shown you where I haven't and even where it may have seemed I did due to crossed purposes, I've straightened it out and you still refuse to acknowledge that you assumed and overlooked. Not to mention being wrong to do so.

you're still refusing to admit...that's actually sad ❌

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Ohhh, you really ARE scrounging for ammo. It was a simple name mistake. No deeper, the principles of said character remained in correct perception.

So try again, honeybunny.

-AC

Nah, actually i had just posted and saw your previous post, and made a quick reply. And i didn't continue with shattering that simple example you were clinging to, because i already had, a few pages ago.

The thing is....i don't even HAVE to try babycakes 😉

EDIT: It's 2:40 AM over here and i need to get up early in order to get some paperwork done...But please respond anyway, and i'll be more than glad to continue the debate tomorrow/today kiss toodles

~wickerman~

Originally posted by Wickerman
1. Because when it all started we had one small misunderstanding, but cleared that up, then you went on contradicting yourself without even attempting to admit to that. You're trying to mix two things (societal influence and inherent influence) into one, and that's impossible. It's like banging a cube and a sphere together to try to get them to mold together.

No, I'm not trying to mix both. You keep revisiting old turf and confusing the issue.

No more or less. That's what you are doing. My issue was regardless of whatever influence, it's not guaranteed that a bisexual is gonna be more prone to lesbianism.

Originally posted by Wickerman
2. Taking the relationship out of the equation is another way of saying "I don't wanna discuss that anymore, because i can't fight it"

True. Which is why I said relationship or no relationship. So it doesn't apply to me sweetness. Nice try in twisting.

Originally posted by Wickerman
[IF we go by the societal influence principle, then yes. If NOT, then no. You initially used the NOT version, then switched to the YES version. That's why you're contradicting yourself.

No, you're wrong.

Regardless of any kind of influence or relationship, it's no guaranteed that a girl will be more prone to lesbianism. I fail to see any rationality behind why you would believe so. You are generalising a whole group, no amount of "I'm talking about this influence" will justify it.

Originally posted by Wickerman
[you're still refusing to admit...that's actually sad ❌

You're still refusing to admit that you're so overly wrong and so overly generalising. Not to mention that I'm actually not contradicting myself. You're just not getting me. Despite me explaining it.

Originally posted by Wickerman
[Nah, actually i had just posted and saw your previous post, and made a quick reply. And i didn't continue with shattering that simple example you were clinging to, because i already had, a few pages ago.

You haven't shattered anything, but been shattered. From within no less.

Because I'm just serving it up plain for all to see and you're just doing the fingers in ears "lalaalaa not listening."

Originally posted by Wickerman
The thing is....i don't even HAVE to try babycakes 😉

EDIT: It's 2:40 AM over here and i need to get up early in order to get some paperwork done...But please respond anyway, and i'll be more than glad to continue the debate tomorrow/today kiss toodles

~wickerman~

Clearly you do, because you're on the back foot sweetcheeks 😉.

-AC

okay so has anyone actually commented on the topic at hand? 😕

Originally posted by silver_tears
okay so has anyone actually commented on the topic at hand? 😕

disgust no wonder I enjoyed my absence so much 😛

It's because, from what I've heard, that people want to be more indidivual than they already are. And most girls I know have done it with girl for the reason of curiosity.

It seems like you miss everything horrible that goes on, Irene. Team Mir, and so-so.

Lucky you. 😬

I really do 😕
Although it kinda sucks, I'd like to have been involved in the pic thread thing 🥷

"The Serra Conflict"?

✅ oui

Where everyone was gawking at Serra. I can honestly say I was not apart of it. I only complimented her once, while A1H complimented her every single chance he got.

Originally posted by HimoKun
It's because, from what I've heard, that people want to be more indidivual than they already are. And most girls I know have done it with girl for the reason of curiosity.

I know a lot of girls who do that...just because they're curious...I've had two girls ask me but I turned them down...lol

You're not alone 😛

haha

The first pics were okay. The several dozen after that were downright annoying.

meh she is gorgeous 🙂

Originally posted by silver_tears
meh she is gorgeous 🙂

as for the girl on girl thing....sure why not 😐

Originally posted by Fëanor
i've got to agree, she was or is....one pic or 85015238519341985 pics later don't matter none....

as for the girl on girl thing....sure why not 😐

Well by then I don't give a flying **** anymore 😐
Although honestly, if she was ugly, no one would fight for her, some people are such filthy liars 😊

Originally posted by GuitarBunny
who is?