Originally posted by GCG
i wouldnt know ; but dont mis-quote me.I said i suspected it in the previous post. Then perhaps a mixturte of both in the latter.
I never misquote
Originally posted by GCG
He is a psychologist that has experienced some form of sexual abuse.
But I understand what your saying, I don't necessarily agree with you, as your comment is purely assumption and supposition, but hey thats cool.
He has a view based on some reasoning which you and I both feel is flawed, at least viewed only from one angle, to make the kind of assumption above without greater evidence is as flawed as his ideas.
Its a possibility though and I guess thats what you really meant and in that I agree🙂
Originally posted by GCG
I suspect is not 100% certain as certain as your guess can be 100% certain.Besides 'experienced some form of sexual abuse' cannot solely be interpreted as a direct experience. It can possibly be that he is a pschyologist working in a school who has encountered this phenomena amongst pupils.
More unfounded assumptions CGC your not a psychologist are you? 🙂 Perhaps he has false memories of assault (you've got me at it now) 😂 Lets just disagree with him debating why? is one step beyond😄
Here's the deal, spanking isn't abuse unless it really gets out of hand - If the parent really goes to town with the intent on really hurting the kid, then it's abuse just like any other. However, the normal "spank" which is more or less just a little tap for intimidation factors is not abuse, it depends on the strength the parent puts fourth.
However, spanking is often a direct result of lazy and ignorant parenting. Spanking your kid, has, psychologically shown to cause more harm then good to the psyche of the children. So it probably shouldn't be done, only in maybe extreme rare circumstances. However, it hitting your kid is the only way to get him to stop being a little assclown, then there are probably more serious problems at hand and he should be taken to the doctor to see if he may have some kind of personallity disorder or something.
A good parent of a normal, mentally sound child should never have to resort to spanking, simple as that.
if the kid is acting really wrong they should be punished.. 😬
coz so called 'non-stresfull- bringing up is crap.
it only makes kids feeling unchastised(?) and they they are allowed to do everything.
maybe i'm old..but it is really totally annoying to see little idiot doing something wrong..and their even more idiotic mummy/daddy saying that it's ok coz the kid can't have stress.
as for the sexual part of it..i don't know.. i don't think that kids think of it like that. rather it is in the 'it hurts' way 😬
Originally posted by botankus
To avoid a bunch of 🤨's, this one's for Bardock:The next 8-year old that cruises through my neighborhood on a moped will get more than a spanking from me! 😉
Hmm....if I wouldn'*t know what you are talking aboot you would get a nice 🤨 .....😛
But yes...i guess that's the least you can do...that is if you don't have a nice gun at home.....
Originally posted by cking
liberals don't believe in spanking, but conservatives do. if the parent really loves the child they would spank them, but if they never loved them, then they won't do it.
Funny. I'm a liberal by American definition, yet I believe that children should receive a few slight slams to keep them in line. And I fully believe they should bring the strap back to school to keep tweens and teenagers in line. Just the thought of kids that age being beaten and shown what it truly means to be punished and their smug little smiles wiped off their faces, would bring great joy to my mouth.
😂
I also firmly believe this as the bible of child discipline
http://maddox.xmission.com/beat.html
😛 JK, but really it's a funny read.
Originally posted by meiwaku
Funny. I'm a liberal by American definition, yet I believe that children should receive a few slight slams to keep them in line. And I fully believe they should bring the strap back to school to keep tweens and teenagers in line. Just the thought of kids that age being beaten and shown what it truly means to be punished and their smug little smiles wiped off their faces, would bring great joy to my mouth.😂
I also firmly believe this as the bible of child discipline
http://maddox.xmission.com/beat.html😛 JK, but really it's a funny read.
HAHAHAHAHAH I got it first....GO ME.....
Originally posted by botankus
I might go Headless Horseman on their asses if I there was a horse around. There's a farm down the street but it only has cows.
Hmm.....you could go Headless Mopedman though....take their mopeds and beath them to death with them (well not all to death....just a little....)
"The question, then, is why slapping a child’s buttocks is not considered a sexual offense. Is it because spanking, unlike fondling, is physically painful and used to punish misbehavior? No, or painfully spanking a misbehaving adult would not be a sexual offense. Is it because children are less likely to be sexual targets than adults, less likely to feel violated, and therefore protected less strictly? No, or fondling an adult would be a far more serious crime than fondling a child. A more plausible explanation for this breach of logic is simply that the majority of people are unable or unwilling to believe there could be anything indecent about a practice as old, common and accepted as the spanking of children—something which nearly everyone has received, given or witnessed at least once. And since spankings typically come from esteemed or even beloved authority figures, many people are loath to question this behavior."
I have to say that the main difference between slapping a child's butt in order to 'discipline' and slapping an adult's butt in order to 'discipline' are two fundamentally different things.
Children are taught that if they are slapped on the butt, it hurts, therefore they are in trouble. Or disgrace. The fact that the child itself knows this as a punishment for misbehaviour immediately separates this kind of discipline from that of the adult erotic 'discipline'. It is the reasoning behind the punishment and the specific knowledge of the child/adult as to why the punishment is occurring that draws the line, not the erogenous zones or how the occurrence makes the child/adult feel.
Basically, the child knows slapping on the butt is for punishment of misdemeanours, and the adult who is into the more 'S&M' style of slapping knows it is for erotic and perverted satisfaction, and this is the fundamental difference, IMO.
I'm sorry if this makes little sense, but I found it quite difficult to explain my train of thought 😮
Originally posted by botankus
Just a little bit of death?
Originally posted by whirlysplat
So girls any of you want to spank an adult? 🙂 You can dress me as a baby if you want😮Only if your over 18 though!!!!!
Let me quote arsenal and one of the greatest stories ever written on this board:
DUDE!!!!!!! SICK!!!!!!!