Thy shall not Kill, because it's a sin....But flooding the earth is not killing

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
You do realise that a flood wouldn't make the bodies just disappear either. There should have been bodies floating everywhere during the flood and bodies littering the ground when the waters receded.

Did the water just dissolved the bodies?

An all-powerful god should be able to kill everyone instantaneously and painlessly. If he can't then he isn't all-powerful. If he just decided it would be fun to drown them instead then he's not a benevolent god.

Oh I get it then... it's like Homer said...
"Well, Ak, it's because God is powerful, but also insecure, like Barbara Streisand before James Brolin." 😆

"An all-powerful god should be able to kill everyone instantaneously and painlessly. If he can't then he isn't all-powerful. If he just decided it would be fun to drown them instead then he's not a benevolent god."
1. He has his reasons, god made plans for everything, he put a large amount of water vapour(But it wasn't a cloud, even science has proven this correct) around the earth in the beginning and it let people live longer because less rays were getting through from the sun, he probably planned to get rid of this layer of vapour to shorten human kinds life-span because he thought it was slightly too long, not forgetting that just making them dissappear wouldn't have gone with his plan.

2. Does it matter how he killed them? All the people on earth in those days(except Noah) deserved such punishment as drowning, they were very bad people. Just like when the tsunami hit, some christians were saved after being forced on to a hill by another religion because they wasn't aloud to have christmas in the town, all the people in the town was hit by the tsunami but the Christians were safe on the hill.

Originally posted by Chibi Boy
1. He has his reasons, god made plans for everything, he put a large amount of water vapour(But it wasn't a cloud, even science has proven this correct) around the earth in the beginning and it let people live longer because less rays were getting through from the sun, he probably planned to get rid of this layer of vapour to shorten human kinds life-span because he thought it was slightly too long, not forgetting that just making them dissappear wouldn't have gone with his plan.

Originally posted by Chibi Boy
2. Does it matter how he killed them? All the people on earth in those days(except Noah) deserved such punishment as drowning, they were very bad people.

Originally posted by Chibi Boy
[B, all the people in the town was hit by the tsunami but the Christians were safe on the hill. [/B]

Along with other religions and beliefs...It wasn't only Christians that survived...

That sounds like a story a Pastor would tell.....Much like this

2. Does it matter how he killed them? All the people on earth in those days(except Noah) deserved such punishment as drowning, they were very bad people

Just like when the tsunami hit, some christians were saved after being forced on to a hill by another religion because they wasn't aloud to have christmas in the town, all the people in the town was hit by the tsunami but the Christians were safe on the hill.

Originally posted by finti
and the christians that fell victim to the tsunami fits in how?

God loved them and was chastising them? 😕 😑

Here's an analogy. It's basically equivalent to someone sculpting a castle out of sand, then not liking the look of it and destroying it instead of even attempting to fix it.
All the story shows is that the god in The Bible has the psychological maturity of a 2 year old.

😂

Originally posted by finti
and the infants

and the christians that fell victim to the tsunami fits in how?

1. I have already explained this, the infants would have died a worser death if he didn't kill them all in the flood, they would have died of starvation.

2. They fit in because it was their time to go, anyways how'd you know that most of them who survived weren't Christians?

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Here's an analogy. It's basically equivalent to someone sculpting a castle out of sand, then not liking the look of it and destroying it instead of even attempting to fix it.
All the story shows is that the god in The Bible has the psychological maturity of a 2 year old.

Originally posted by Chibi Boy
No, It shows you have the psychological maturity of a 2 year old. They were impossible to fix, it was stuck in their heads, just like the non-existance of god is stuck in yours. People weren't bad when god first made man but changed by eating from the Tree Of The Knowledge Of Good And Evil. So the sand castle became dodgy and was unfixable so he had to start again with the best part of it.

So, there is something even God can't do?

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Here's an analogy. It's basically equivalent to someone sculpting a castle out of sand, then not liking the look of it and destroying it instead of even attempting to fix it.
All the story shows is that the god in The Bible has the psychological maturity of a 2 year old.

This is an insult to every 2 year old I've ever met......

Originally posted by Chibi Boy
No, It shows you have the psychological maturity of a 2 year old.

Originally posted by Chibi Boy
They were impossible to fix, it was stuck in their heads, just like the non-existance of god is stuck in yours. People weren't bad when god first made man but changed by eating from the Tree Of The Knowledge Of Good And Evil. So the sand castle became dodgy and was unfixable so he had to start again with the best part of it.

God doesn't give his creations knowledge of good and evil - of right and wrong.
The naive are egged on by one of god's prior creations to do something that god considers wrong.
They do something that he considers wrong, of course how would they know it's wrong - they have no knowledge of right and wrong - it gives them knowledge of right and wrong.
God blames them.

I can just picture a sign on god's desk that reads "The buck doesn't stop here."

And Bardock, I apologise to the 2 year olds you know. An oversight on my part, I too know of 2 year olds more psychologically developed.

Originally posted by Bardock42
This is an insult to every 2 year old I've ever met......

But we still talk to you....especially on a bunny bright moon. 😉

They fit in because it was their time to go, anyways how'd you know that most of them who survived weren't Christians

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Here's an analogy. It's basically equivalent to someone sculpting a castle out of sand, then not liking the look of it and destroying it instead of even attempting to fix it.
All the story shows is that the god in The Bible has the psychological maturity of a 2 year old.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Or maybe things were so ****ed that the people living then didn't even deserve a second chance? I'm betting it was Sodom and Gomorrah ten times over.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
So an omniscient god didn't have the foresight to see that this would happen, or the sense to intervene earlier or the compassion to forgive? Or an omnipotent god didn't have the power to fix them, or didn't have the power to kill only the adults and spare the innocent infants and children, or only kill the humans and not the animals?

The other possibility is this is what god wanted, this is perfecting. That would mean that god made sin.

God made sin, god made sin......Cause he likes to watch.. 😈 😇

The other possibility is this is what god wanted, this is perfecting. That would mean that god made sin.

Originally posted by debbiejo
God made sin, god made sin......Cause he likes to watch.. 😈 😇