http://www.killermovies.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-351416
maybe they should visit here again
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-351416
maybe they should visit here again
Originally posted by Deano
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-351416maybe they should visit here again
John Galt (a pen name of a researcher fearing to be identified), in an unpublished manuscript (now in my possession), The Genealogy of the New World Order, has traced the royal ancestry of George Bush, which traces from Charlemagne and Alfred the Great, all the way down through George Bush's 32 presidential cousins!
This is exactly what I am referring to.
1. Unnamed researcher.
2. Unpublished manuscript.
Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
Research the Chesbro line in Scotland. A farmer declared himself king of his land. By title, he was king. In reality, he was a farmer. Does that make me royalty?
Alright so you admit your not royalty then? What was the point in mentioning it in the first place if you knew it dosen't mean your connected to royalty?
Originally posted by Novusordo
Alright so you admit your not royalty then? What was the point in mentioning it in the first place if you knew it dosen't mean your connected to royalty?
Do you actually read before posting Novusordo? You keep banging home the point of lineage of European royalty. Anyone could declare himself a royal in those days. That doesn't make them royalty.
Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
I want you to provide the historical records that back up your claim Novusordo. Can you provide that information?
Historical records I'm afraid don't exist simply becuase the royals control the very institutions and groups which pen out history and form the official version of the world.
Though there has been a ton of research from many sources on the true lineage of European royalty
Many historians and scientists and archiologists have said that their is definately a hidden force within those fields that filter what gets out into the public domain and what gets ignored.
Their has been scientific and historical breakthroughs so groundbreaking that it would rock the foundations of humanity but of course, they never get into the public domain but rather the odd website or book that then gets slandered as ridiculous and hysterical becuase it goes against narrow-minded conventional thinking.
Originally posted by Novusordo
Historical records I'm afraid don't exist simply becuase the royals control the very institutions and groups which pen out history and form the official version of the world.Though there has been a ton of research from many sources on the true lineage of European royalty
Many historians and scientists and archiologists have said that their is definately a hidden force within those fields that filter what gets out into the public domain and what gets ignored.Their has been scientific and historical breakthroughs so groundbreaking that it would rock the foundations of humanity but of course, they never get into the public domain but rather the odd website or book that then gets slandered as ridiculous and hysterical becuase it goes against narrow-minded conventional thinking.
So, what are these claims based on? I am not a genealogist, but normally when you trace a lineage you normally do so through birth records and official documents. If these documents don't exist, how did the researcher come to his conclusion? To be convinced, any person researching your claims has to search out undisputable sources of proof such as DNA comparisons, birth records, etc...
Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
So, what are these claims based on? I am not a genealogist, but normally when you trace a lineage you normally do so through birth records and official documents. If these documents don't exist, how did the researcher come to his conclusion? To be convinced, any person researching your claims has to search out undisputable sources of proof such as DNA comparisons, birth records, etc...
Well they are obviously researching deeply and hard and looking at all the material that exists that indirectly tells the whole picture.
Just becuase there isen't any documents publicly available that show you the true chart of European royalty dosen't mean there is nothing. Indirect material that, when pieced together with the rest can form the whole picture.
Though such a chart was discovered in the Priory of Sion which showed how all the people in power descended from the Merovignians.
Originally posted by Novusordo
Well they are obviously researching deeply and hard and looking at all the material that exists that indirectly tells the whole picture.Just becuase there isen't any documents publicly available that show you the true chart of European royalty dosen't mean there is nothing. Indirect material that, when pieced together with the rest can form the whole picture.
Though such a chart was discovered in the Priory of Sion which showed how all the people in power descended from the Merovignians.
i dont think that chart ever got a mention did it? because it would of demolished the official version of history
or am i thinking of something else? i might of got mixed up
The lineage of the Merovingians has been greatly disputed among both genalogists and theologists. Many of their documents regarding their lineage from Jesus Christ have been called fake. I'm not insulting you, but much of this appears to be based on assumptions, not cold hard facts. It reminds me of the debate on God. You can't prove he does exist or he doesn't, you have to believe in one or the other without the necessary proof needed to make an informed decision.
Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
The lineage of the Merovingians has been greatly disputed among both genalogists and theologists. Many of their documents regarding their lineage from Jesus Christ have been called fake. I'm not insulting you, but much of this appears to be based on assumptions, not cold hard facts. It reminds me of the debate on God. You can't prove he does exist or he doesn't, you have to believe in one or the other without the necessary proof needed to make an informed decision.
lol don't get caught up in the Merovignian being the line of Jesus or the Priory of Sion being the guardians of the Holy Grail or any other sensationalistic shit like it. That might sound ironic but once you understand the global conspiracy enough, it really is not sensational whatsoever.
And yes, Jesus is a total myth created by the Pisco bloodline then force fed onto the world by Constantine the Great and yes - The Piscos are an Illuminati bloodline where alot of European royalty descended from. These guys haven't infiltrated the already present establishment - they created it from the ground-up.
Originally posted by Deano
i created a thread in the religion forum using huge chunks from ickes book to show how christianity was formed
Christianity was formed by the followers of "Jesus Christ" in the century following his death. This is historical record. Jesus Christ, the son of god may not have been real, but the man who inspired the religion was definitely real. This also can be determined from historical record.