Oswald, really, the origins of Christianity, like history in general, go down as a pile of incomplete, conveniantly shaped and half-truth ridden shit of the most inaccurate kind. It's tragic that it gets fed to kids year after year in school but then again, thats why school is there for - to indoctrinate people at an early age to accept their version of reality.
Christianity was created by many different groups and refined and rehashed to suit the current agenda of the times untill we get today's "version" of Christianity created by Constantine the Great at the Council of Nicea.
It's realisations such as that which get you aware that the Illuminati haven't infiltrated into power, they actually created it all from the begining.
Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
[B]John Galt (a pen name of a researcher fearing to be identified), in an unpublished manuscript (now in my possession), The Genealogy of the New World Order, has traced the royal ancestry of George Bush, which traces from Charlemagne and Alfred the Great, all the way down through George Bush's 32 presidential cousins!This is exactly what I am referring to.
1. Unnamed researcher.
2. Unpublished manuscript. [/B]
He has a pretty cool nickname though.......
Anyways I think i never read so much Bullshit in my life (and I have read great parts of the Bible)
lol you idiots, can't you see that John Galt has **** all to do with the paragraph that is divided from the rest of the page...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is commonly assumed that there is no aristocracy, let alone nobility, in America. Nothing could be farther from the truth. In his work, Ancestors of American Presidents, Gary Boyd Roberts of the New England Historic Genealogical Society reveals at least 33 presidents of the United States have been related to England’s King Alfred the Great (849-899) and Charlemagne (742-814), the famous monarch of France, and 19 Presidents are related to England’s King Edward III (1312-1377), who has a thousand blood connections to Prince Charles. Royal descendency is not only common for presidents but for other leading politicians, banking and business tycoons, military leaders, media owners, government officials, intelligence agency chiefs, etc, etc, and you will find they come from the same bloodlines which can be charted back to the British and European royal and aristocratic families and their origins in the Middle and Near East at the time of Sumer and Babylon.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Galt (a pen name of a researcher fearing to be identified), in an unpublished manuscript (now in my possession), The Genealogy of the New World Order, has traced the royal ancestry of George Bush, which traces from Charlemagne and Alfred the Great, all the way down through George Bush's 32 presidential cousins!
YOu see your "mistake" now?
Originally posted by Novusordo
Well they are obviously researching deeply and hard and looking at all the material that exists that indirectly tells the whole picture.Just becuase there isen't any documents publicly available that show you the true chart of European royalty dosen't mean there is nothing. Indirect material that, when pieced together with the rest can form the whole picture.
Though such a chart was discovered in the Priory of Sion which showed how all the people in power descended from the Merovignians.
f**k me, how stupid can people be?
The people that planeted that fake document- along with the faking of the entirity of the Priory of Zion- even admitted they faked it and explained how!
I suppose you will just say that in itself was faked- your knee-jerk response to all evidence that goes against what you say, which is why there can be no process of intellectualism in your arguments.
Again- it is an insult to the intellect of humanity that this stuff is not believed.
The centrepiece of your aregument is that it is not possible for you to get evidence for it. Hence, your argument is shite. I don't care what your excuses for the evidence not being there is. NO argument without the evidence can ever be considered.
I didn't read this thread because quite frankly, this conspiracy stuff bores me.
That said,...............I'm a democrat.......a registered democrat........and I voted for Bush. Reason being, Kerry's a jackass. He had no political platform other than tell people what they want to hear. American's aren't the smartest bunch of people in the world but we do know when a presidential candidate gives a speech, on television, supporting an idea........and another the very next week, on television, condemning the same idea that he's full of shit.
who else could have more insight into the political climate of America than British teenagers? After all, they KNOW the voting was rigged because well.......uh....hmmmmm.........despite the fact we American citizens were the ones casting our votes for George W. Bush and clearly remember who we voted for. I heard Prince Charles recently re-married. Shouldn't you be keeping up with the internal conspiracies in Buckingham palace concerning that? I hear the Queen is not too fond of her new daugher-in-law. Perhaps another limousine accident will happen in the near future.............