London bombings - inside job (like always)

My thoughts are someone else's? You copy and paste things off a website. You must like dramatic irony too.

My thoughts would be someone else's if I simply subscribed to the "information" you peddle without evidence - and it's your job to provide that if you want to convince people.

When someone disagrees with you you go into some spiel about how their mind is warped by society.
Delusion = a false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence.
Paranoia = an extreme, irrational distrust of others.

Search for answers all you like but why clog up the forum with thread after thread of essentially the same thing and not do as suggested and simply post every one of your "answers" you find in one thread.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
My thoughts are someone else's? You copy and paste things off a website. You must like dramatic irony too.

My thoughts would be someone else's if I simply subscribed to the "information" you peddle without evidence - and it's your job to provide that if you want to convince people.

When someone disagrees with you you go into some spiel about how their mind is warped by society.
Delusion = a false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence.
Paranoia = an extreme, irrational distrust of others.

Search for answers all you like but why clog up the forum with thread after thread of essentially the same thing and not do as suggested and simply post every one of your "answers" you find in one thread.

extreme distrust??
invalidating evidence?
your having a laugh mate

they dont force this info onto me, i searched for it
the goverment and media on the other hand...

Originally posted by Fianna
The things you post can probably be found pretty much word for word if you google conspiracy theories, how can you say that without thinking yourself hypocritical? ..I pretty sure you didn't think up this whole conspiracy yourself..everyone's thoughts are influenced by others..

yes but there is lots of evidence if you do the right research. no one does though

You subscribe to the information wholeheartedly. Your views are someone else's. Thus I found it very rich, you telling me that I need to think for myself.

Take a step back for a moment and look at how others may perceive you. If someone perceives that you have provided no substantiative evidence - you have in fact contradicted eye witness accounts - then can you realise why some may comment that you appear delusional.

Originally posted by Deano
yes but there is lots of evidence if you do the right research.

Originally posted by Me
My thoughts would be someone else's if I simply subscribed to the "information" you peddle without evidence - and it's your job to provide that if you want to convince people.

Deano, is there ANY world event that isn't because of these mystic being things? 😐 Or are you seriously retarded, and think EVERYTHING stems from them?

Originally posted by Deano
yes but there is lots of evidence if you do the right research. no one does though

Originally posted by dave123
Deano, is there ANY world event that isn't because of these mystic being things? 😐 Or are you seriously retarded, and think EVERYTHING stems from them?

you have hardly any right to ask if im retarded 😉
most world events are staged, not all but most

And an example of one where it WASN'T set up, please?

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
You subscribe to the information wholeheartedly. Your views are someone else's. Thus I found it very rich, you telling me that I need to think for myself.

Take a step back for a moment and look at how others may perceive you. If someone perceives that you have provided no substantiative evidence - you have in fact contradicted eye witness accounts - then can you realise why some may comment that you appear delusional.

^ This is almost like your catch phrase.

If you aren't trying to convince people and you aren't just seeking attention, then may I ask in all sincerity why do you constantly make these threads.

whats evidence to you? where do u get your evidence from? and why do you trust it?

oh, and the retard thing was to get your attention 😉 nothing meant by it...

I think Deano has a point, and those who make folly of his attempts to educate are so brainwashed by the media and thier upbringing they no longer have an open mind to even consider anything else as what CNN reports, going agains the grain may be odd but its good that there´s some people brave enough to do it.

The new world order is out there, open your eyes and see the truth

Originally posted by dave123
oh, and the retard thing was to get your attention 😉 nothing meant by it...

thats cool then🙂

I think the question should be what have the NWO got to gain from doing terrorist attacks. The answer is to eventually eliminate religion

its easier to figure out religion is a scam nowadays...all the religious people have to say to answer all the non believers is 'have faith' 🙄

yes blind faith is not healthy.
when someone blindly believes some nonsensical scripture and quotes it word for word to others, attempting to impose that belief on others, and intruding in every conversation with it...its quite annoying.

now lets see if he senses the irony.

blind faith is not healthy your right..but im not blindly following it..ive researched it alot. i look at both sides of the argument.
you dont do that. im not imposing it on you. you have the choice to come into my threads..its your choice

Originally posted by PVS
yes blind faith is not healthy.
when someone blindly believes some nonsensical scripture and quotes it word for word to others, attempting to impose that belief on others, and intruding in every conversation with it...its quite annoying.

now lets see if he senses the irony.

It seems to me PVS that over the threads you have been blindly following nonsensical propaganda and have never bothered to research for yourself,you just accept what you are told!

“your questions hold no relevance anyway..absolutly none”
😆
Yes, they do. Don’t you have a website you can copy-and-paste some answers from?

“well when they do another bombing and blame it on al CIAaida i mean al quaida, maybe you will stop and think from now on.”
Let me ask you this: What would it take to convince you, that the bombings were not committed by reptile-controlled Illuminati from the lower fourth dimension?
What are your credentials for deciding what the truth is? What is your education or other skills to give you monopoly on finding the truth?

Here are my questions again:
Deano>“The editors they appoint might know something about it, as may certain columnists, but most of the journalists will have no idea.”
How would high-level people know “it” if they’re not out in the field? And how do you know this?

Deano>“The editor is always there to block anything they write that is against the interests of the Illuminati - as directed by the owner-and if they insist on pursuing an unwelcome story they find themselves looking for another job.”
So – among the thousand of journalists not ONE is brave enough to want the truth out more than keeping his/her job? And EVERY editor in England is an Illuminati?? Every single one of them? How do you know this?

Deano>“Most of the 'information' that journalists present comes from official (Illuminati) sources anyway.”
How do you know this?

Deano>“In the immediate aftermath of a major event such as September 11 th, where are the reporters getting their information from? Official sources! Name me a single piece of relevant information broadcast by the mainstream media about what happened on 9/11, how it was done, who did it and what the retaliation should be, that did not come from official sources. Not one!”
How do you know this?

Deano>“We are told that White House sources say this, FBI sources say that, and OA or Pentagon sources say the other. This is how the Illuminati transmit through the media the version of events they wish the public to believe.”
How do you know this? How do you know that every single person in the White House, FBI, Pentagon etc. are “in” with the Illuminati? Watergate! The journalists were not assassinated, were they? The Illuminated couldn’t even keep something as “small” as Watergate from the press. How’d they keep something as government bombing from leaking??

Deano>“In the weeks and months that followed, researchers who are interested in the real truth begin to dig away.”
How do you know what the REAL TRUTH is?

Deano>“But where are their reports published? In small-circulation newsletters, self-published books, on the Internet and radio stations that operate with a fraction of the money and potential audience of the Illuminati empires.”
So, only smaller groups with less resources and money know the REAL truth? How do you know this?

Bicnaroc> “I think Deano has a point, and those who make folly of his attempts…” But he is not attempting anything, you know? He’s stating his beliefs, but can’t prove them.

Perhaps the Illuminati wanted the Watergate Scandel to escape into the publics eye.....hmmmm

😆
Oh, yes! RIGHT! The example that it would be impossible for a world-wide organisation to secretly control everything, silence all opposition and keep a lid on all things is now because THEY wanted it.
HOW... very convinient.
I suppose it was done to get a FREEMASON in the White House, namely Gerald Ford!
(Nods slowly).