Originally posted by The Omega
Deano> “At ownership level, people like Conrad Black at the Hollinger Group and Rupert Murdoch of the News Corporation know what is going on.”
How do YOU know this?“The editors they appoint might know something about it, as may certain columnists, but most of the journalists will have no idea.”
How would high-level people know “it” if they’re not out in the field? And how do you know this?
“The editor is always there to block anything they write that is against the interests of the Illuminati - as directed by the owner-and if they insist on pursuing an unwelcome story they find themselves looking for another job.”
So – among the thousand of journalists not ONE is brave enough to want the truth out more than keeping his/her job? And EVERY editor in England is an Illuminati?? Every single one of them? How do you know this?
“Most of the 'information' that journalists present comes from official (Illuminati) sources anyway.”
How do you know this?
“In the immediate aftermath of a major event such as September 11 th, where are the reporters getting their information from? Official sources! Name me a single piece of relevant information broadcast by the mainstream media about what happened on 9/11, how it was done, who did it and what the retaliation should be, that did not come from official sources. Not one!”
How do you know this?
“We are told that White House sources say this, FBI sources say that, and OA or Pentagon sources say the other. This is how the Illuminati transmit through the media the version of events they wish the public to believe.”
How do you know this? How do you know that every single person in the White House, FBI, Pentagon etc. are “in” with the Illuminati? Watergate! The journalists were not assassinated, were they? The Illuminated couldn’t even keep something as “small” as Watergate from the press. How’d they keep something as government bombing from leaking??
“In the weeks and months that followed, researchers who are interested in the real truth begin to dig away.”
How do you know what the REAL TRUTH is?
“But where are their reports published? In small-circulation newsletters, self-published books, on the Internet and radio stations that operate with a fraction of the money and potential audience of the Illuminati empires.”
So, only smaller groups with less resources and money know the REAL truth? How do you know this?
well since david icke was a journalist and tv presenter for many years with the bbc, id say he has a fair idea of what is going on. there is no point sayin 'how do you know this?' all i can say is research and read a book
heres a sample:
The names Rothschild, Rockefeller, Kissinger and Carrington appear on the boards and ‘advisory’ boards of global media corporations and that’s no surprise. To control humanity through the mind and emotions you simply have to control the media. Without that it’s impossible. This is made so much easier because the overwhelming majority of journalists in the world, including the so-called ‘big names’ in each country, are either agents for the Brotherhood (the small minority) or they don’t know their arse from their elbow when it comes to understanding what is going on in the world.
I’ve been a journalist and so I have seen both sides and what is termed the communications industry is really the blind (journalists) leading the blind (their readers and viewers). My experience as a journalist,
and as the target of journalists, has shown me very clearly how remarkably few brain cells you need to do the job. Every day on television stations all over the world, journalists and correspondents give their viewers the official version of the event they are reporting. “White House sources say this..., the Prime Minister says that..., the FBI say the other... “In all my time in journalism I cannot recall a single conversation in a newsroom that didn’t reflect the official version of life and the world. Most journalists are not manipulating, they are simply stunningly uninformed and often incredibly arrogant. They believe that if anything of magnitude was going on they would know about it because they are ‘journalists’. In truth they are the last to know. Arrogance and naivete, the mental
combination that produces so many journalists, is a telling and highly destructive combination. Add a padlocked mind and you’ve got the job.
One BBC interviewer said to me in all seriousness that we should be no more concerned about the membership of the Freemasons than we should the membership of the local squash club. I’m not kidding. I have given many journalists the story of what is going on and they have either dismissed it without even looking at the evidence or they have ridiculed the information without looking at the evidence. I remember meeting a guy, I think his name was Taylor or something, in Los Angeles in early 1997. He worked for The Observer newspaper in London. I told him about the paedophile activities of George Bush and his drug running operation. I offered to put him in touch with some of those who had been abused by Bush. What did this ‘journalist’ do? He went away and wrote an article making personal attacks on me, including the fact that my eyes appeared bloodshot. Not surprising after a non stop speaking tour of Australia, New Zealand and the United States over a period of two months, but how can anyone write about the state of someone’s eyes when they are being offered, as he put it himself, the “Story of the century”? Because he’s a journalist, that’s why I offered to put the British Sunday People in contact with similar sources, but they didn’t want to know. As the old saying goes: “You cannot bribe or twist the great British journalist, but seeing what they will do unbribed, there’s no reason to.” Of course there are journalists who are exceptions, and honourable ones, but they are so, so rare and ask them what happens when they try to write the story as it really is.
Journalists dance to the official tune and become the copy typists and town criers for the official version of life. They are the ‘gofers’ for those higher up the media pyramid. At the top are bankers who provide the funds to buy the media groups. These bankers also control the major industries and business networks and the newspaper, television, and radio operations cannot survive without the advertising revenue from these people.
interesting no? can you get your head around all of that?
lots more info in the book if you bothered to read it