yah i think Debbies first post was right, sex has been attempted to be, for lack of better word, "regulated" in religion. Catholics believe sex's sole purpose is to procreate. other religions im not too sure about, but I personally think that it just comes down to what you feel is right. I think sex is supposed to be a sign of intense affection. A sign of how much you love a person. That one person that you want to be with forever.
Its fun, sex is an awesome thing, but its just thrown around really casually nowadays
I wouldn't have sex with him anyway without a condom. He is uncircumcised, and it looks gross, so with a condom, it will not showyou never seen an uncircumcised penis erected have you?
who ever uses a Condom, is breaking the true purpose of sex, witch is to have childrenbeside the fact that condoms can actually prevent transmittable venereal diseases as well, so for all means never mind the bollocs of VD`s and other nasty things that can get transmitted
The catholic church has been morally opposed to contraception and orgasmic acts outside of the context of fully natural marital intercourse as far back as one can historically trace. For instance, the 2nd century Epistle of Barnabas takes it for granted that oral sex is immoral.
The official position of the Catholic Church regarding birth control is expressed very clearly in Pope Pius XI's 1930 encyclical entitled Casti Connubii.
Since, therefore, openly departing from the uninterrupted Christian tradition some recently have judged it possible solemnly to declare another doctrine regarding this question, the Catholic Church, ... in order that she may preserve the chastity of the nuptial union from being defiled by this foul stain, ... proclaims anew: any use whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life is an offense against the law of God and of nature, and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin.
In 1968 Pope Paul VI released an encyclical titled Humanae Vitae, which again forbade chemical and barrier methods but suggested natural methods such as the rhythm method or natural family planning might be considered in cases of necessity. These methods are known as "periodic abstinence" and are argued to be morally different from positively modifying the couple' s fertility, since the modus operandi is abstinence.
It seems that they are much more concerned that people would be having sex outside of marriage than they are over the spread of disease - so they are willing to risk the latter in order to take a stand against the former.
Originally posted by debbiejo
Yup, your boyfriend is conning you.....That's not real love....It's conditional....It's an old trick.and BTW....I think babies should be born the size of hamsters...If god loved us god would of done that... 😄
you do realize that Christ was a type of Phallic symbol don't you.
Christ assumed the role of a phallic god in providing the most popular of conception charms...The Holy Prepuce. There were hundreds of them in Renaissance churches...At least thirteen still survive..All had power to make woman conceive...The most celebrated of the virile foreskins, housed at the Abbey Church in Chartres was credited with thousand of miraculous pregnancies.....In the 17 century the image of St. Guignole had a large erect penis from which women scraped splinters as conception charms....It was worshipped even before Christianity....
Your boyfriend just has a problem...tell him to be Christ like. 😇
Tell him to wear a tent.
Re: Condoms/Oral/Anal are a sin
Originally posted by WhiteSnowAngel
My boyfriend, wanted to have sex with me, so I told him to use a Condom, and well he said it's a sin, because who ever uses a Condom, is breaking the true purpose of sex, witch is to have children. By using a Condom he said it means you just using it for fun and have no ittention of having children. I said...ok, but I dont want kids right now, and he replied, then you will have to wait for sex....ok I said once again. So I suggested Oral Sex..then he said, that is also a sin, because the "Penis" is not suppose to go in ones mouth or go in anal, because again it stops the real purpose of sex, and only is meant for the Virgina, to make kids, when one is married only. I am mad, because he is a really nice guy, but is to religious, and I don't plan on getting married any time soon. I am way to young, and just want to experiment, but no everything is religious.Well is he right or wrong ?
In what religion is he religious? Because if it is Christianity, the Bible never says that sex is just for procreation. Sex is also about companionship and commitment - it is one of the strongest connections between two people.
Originally posted by debbiejo
I think that teaching started out as more a Catholic teaching...Not to waste seed...and I think the story comes from the Bible story of Tamar.
but6 that was withdrawal, not a condom
((Btw that is such a major coincidence, I just read the story of Tamar this morning when I was reading my bible!))
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
What the hell does being gay have to do with anything? The guy didn't want to wear a condom during sex...and she didn't want to give him a blowjob because he's uncut.
Please don't take offence. There are some of us who except homosexuality to the point were we are ok with joking about it. Are you ok with joking about it?