i dont give a damn about innocent until proven guilty in this instance. you dont say those types of things. thats like working on a stud farm and saying that you fanatsize about boinking the horses.. how can you expect them to dangle these little kids in front of him like cute wittle itty bitty chew toys and not concieve that this might be a disaster waiting to happen?
Originally posted by manjaro
i dont give a damn about innocent until proven guilty in this instance. you dont say those types of things. thats like working on a stud farm and saying that you fanatsize about boinking the horses.. how can you expect them to dangle these little kids in front of him like cute wittle itty bitty chew toys and not concieve that this might be a disaster waiting to happen?
YHour point of view is one I understand, I think the concept of paedophillia is wrong, however punishing those who have done nothing wrong is equally wrong.
Originally posted by manjaro
i dont give a damn about innocent until proven guilty in this instance. you dont say those types of things. thats like working on a stud farm and saying that you fanatsize about boinking the horses.. how can you expect them to dangle these little kids in front of him like cute wittle itty bitty chew toys and not concieve that this might be a disaster waiting to happen?
Ok, lets say you are right and get your way. Now, for illustration purposes lets say you are a teacher and I am another teacher in the same school. For a long time now you have always been in my way of doing what I want to do, so I go to the principle and tell him/her that you said you would like to have sex with little boys. Now this is untrue and I am lying, but you get fired and I get your job.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Why?...How are children more important than any other being?
Unlike adults, they are less able to defend themselves... They are innocent children! I can't believe how anyone can believe that it is Ok to subject them to a known paedophile!
No, they're not 'better' than another human being but they're defenceless, reliant on adults not being sexually twisted.
Originally posted by BackFire
Children can't take care of themselves, thus they may need special or even extreme laws to protect them.It's quite simple if you put any sort of thought into it.
that does not make them more important in the late 80's and early nineties believing the word of children over adults with little or no corroboration caused a great deal of problems for innocent people, I know of a teacher who served 9 months in prison on the word of a child which was later to be found false. Who needed the protection more, the man on rule 43 or the lying child? His wife left him before it came out it was all lies and I don't think the rifts in hi relationships with his own children ever healed totally. They were not protected. Its not as simple as you believe my friend, Bardock and I see that. Its simple for tabloid think though.
Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
that does not make them more important in the late 80's and early nineties believing the word of children over adults with little or no corroboration caused a great deal of problems for innocent people, I know of a teacher who served 9 months in prison on the word of a child which was later to be found false. Who needed the protection more, the man on rule 43 or the lying child? His wife left him before it came out it was all lies and I don't think the rifts in hi relationships with his own children ever healed totally. They were not protected. Its not as simple as you believe my friend, Bardock and I see that. Its simple for tabloid think though.
We're not saying that they're more important! It is our duty to protect the innocent! We're not protecting them because they're in some way 'superior' to adults... it is because they are unable to care for themselves.
Originally posted by BackFire
Children can't take care of themselves, thus they may need special or even extreme laws to protect them.It's quite simple if you put any sort of thought into it.
Originally posted by Britannia
Unlike adults, they are less able to defend themselves... They are innocent children! I can't believe how anyone can believe that it is Ok to subject them to a known paedophile!
No, they're not 'better' than another human being but they're defenceless, reliant on adults not being sexually twisted.
First of all I was asking why they are mo0re important than let's say you, you or me.......swcond...aybe they are defensless but that doesn't mean that you can by pretending you want to protect them, put innocent peoplöe away.....that is just unfair...an d you guys really make me sick......it's a hell of a freedom we have here when someone isn't even allowed to think free anymore.
Originally posted by Bardock42
First of all I was asking why they are mo0re important than let's say you, you or me.......swcond...aybe they are defensless but that doesn't mean that you can by pretending you want to protect them, put innocent peoplöe away.....that is just unfair...an d you guys really make me sick......it's a hell of a freedom we have here when someone isn't even allowed to think free anymore.
I wouldn't have him locked away! I would have him fired. It is inapproproate for a paedophile to work in a school. Dangerous. It would be like having a drug dealer working in a rehabilitation centre.
Originally posted by Britannia
I wouldn't have him locked away! I would have him fired. It is inapproproate for a paedophile to work in a school. Dangerous. It would be like having a drug dealer working in a rehabilitation centre.
No if the drug dealer has never dealt drugs or the paedophile has never touched a child
Originally posted by Bardock42
First of all I was asking why they are mo0re important than let's say you, you or me.......swcond...aybe they are defensless but that doesn't mean that you can by pretending you want to protect them, put innocent peoplöe away.....that is just unfair...an d you guys really make me sick......it's a hell of a freedom we have here when someone isn't even allowed to think free anymore.
Your right
Originally posted by Britannia
It is still wholly inappropriate. How can you even think it is ok to put defeneless children at risk of molestation?
What the hell...the child is a lot safer with someone that admitted that.......and you cant just fire someone for their thoughts...where should that stop.....