Pedophillia

Look at Lana. Go on with your own bad self.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Look at Lana. Go on with your own bad self.

-AC

It's just that I know in real life you say 'splitting'.

Dalendless shid.

Wait, nobody even gets that reference. Why continue to use it?

-AC

i honestly dont think pedophiles can be reformed.

they can be taught to control themselves and not act on any sexual urges....

but you cant change a persons sexual preference through therapy...

pedophilia is a sexual preference just as heterosexuality or homosexuality, however pedophiles are a danger to the community, especially a community with children.

Trying to change their sexual preference through therapy is just a waste of time, all it will do is make them repress their feelings. Repression causes violence, and there is nothing more dangerous than a violent pedophile.

What the reformation therapy needs to focus on is control. Control of their impulses, and their actions/reactions in everyday situations and enviornments

^ my post wouldnt let me edit.

I wanted to add that I am in NO way advocating pedophilia in my last post. I personally think theyre sick, mentally diseased people who should be locked away, however if help is sought before their mental state gets away from them then thats where my last post comes in

Hairy boobs...sounds like an off topic thread..aren't a lot of European chicks hairy?

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Not wanting to dispute your post

but its:

paedophile

in the UK and US if its a Psychiatrist he is bound by "patient" confidentiality

Actually no. If a psychiatraist fears that the person's feeligns could lead person to do harm to another person ( a child in this case) he/she is obligated to a manditory report.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Actually no. If a psychiatraist fears that the person's feeligns could lead person to do harm to another person ( a child in this case) he/she is obligated to a manditory report.

yes, i believe she is correct.
similar rule applies to suicidal patients.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Actually no. If a psychiatraist fears that the person's feeligns could lead person to do harm to another person ( a child in this case) he/she is obligated to a manditory report.

Not in the UK, for thoughts unless they think they need sectioning, sorry its Doctor patient.

Thats not to say problems have arisen.

http://www.cpa-apc.org/Publications/Archives/CJP/1998/Dec/glancy.htm

however

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=18745

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
OH I LOVE THIS! The old "Couldn't beat him in one thread, gonna try another". Sweet.

Failure to recognise doesn't have anything to do with being deceived. Being deceived is when an outside influence PURPOSEFULLY and with intent, feeds a false story or issue to mislead.

Failure to recognise is eluding. As I said, you said the point "should illude" me meaning that I failed to recognise it, right? Let's refer to your friend.

ILLUDE:

\Il*lude"\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. Illuded; p. pr. & vb. n. Illuding.] [L. illudere, illusum; pref. il- in + ludere to play: cf. OF. illuder. See Ludicrous.] [b]To play upon by artifice; to deceive; to mock; to excite and disappoint the hopes of.

That's not applicable to the notion in which you said it. So let's see what you meant, being that you said you meant "Failed to recognise":

ELUDE:

tr.v. e·lud·ed, e·lud·ing, e·ludes
To evade or escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill: The suspect continues to elude the police.
To escape the understanding or grasp of: a name that has always eluded me; a metaphor that eluded them. See Synonyms at escape.

So yes. You said "illude". You meant "elude".

Hope this has cleared things up 🙂. Glad we could have this chat.

-AC [/B]

(Wish I had done this, though.)

In the UK they ony have a duty to disclose past crimes, not thoughts🙂

http://www.emory.edu/AAPL/newsletter/N241_Royal_College_meeting.htm

including if a crime has been committed

I hope this explains things for you.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Count it.

(Wish I had done this, though.)

Its very good isn't it, AC although can be OTT sometimes in this case is completely right🙂

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Its very good isn't it, AC although can be OTT sometimes in this case is completely right🙂

and who cares about sticking to the topic when you can turn a thread into a juvenile pissing contest. PWN3D!!!

Originally posted by FeceMan
To be honest, it didn't add anything to the thread aside from an "OWNED" moment, but I do derive a certain satisfaction from pointing out grammatical errors.

well as a dyslexic I make loads, sadly.

I still past Language and Lit though but it was hard, unlike most subjests, damn that specific learing difficulty🙂

Originally posted by PVS
and who cares about sticking to the topic when you can turn a thread into a juvenile pissing contest. PWN3D!!!

Its rare its worth the trouble but that guy deserved it 🙂

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Dalendless shid.

Wait, nobody even gets that reference. Why continue to use it?

-AC

No-one gets it because their all dwads.... and you're a dosser..... and I'll level with you.... I'm scared.....

Apologies to those who have enjoyed the thread. Was not my intention to ruin.

-AC

Originally posted by eleveninches
I was thinking about this the other day. Do you think that pedophilles should be able to be arrested just because of their sexual orientation even if they have not commited any crime.

i think it is funny as shit that you think being a pedophile is a sexual orientation, that had me rolling for a few minutes i swear 😆 😆

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt

The crazy thing and don't tell Deano is David Icke may well have got it right this time 😕 and don't tell Deano I read some David Icke and agreed with it on this - OK

http://www.davidicke.net/newsroom/europe/england/080101a.html

😎 he's right all the time