Philosophy is meaningless

The nouns "right" and "wrong" can easily be applied to "morals". Right and good can have synonymistic denotation, as can wrong and evil.
And I still don't see the point of your post - words can be used in different ways... so what?

They didn't have the knowledge and that is why they actually ate from the tree.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
The nouns "right" and "wrong" can easily be applied to "morals". Right and good can have synonymistic denotation, as can wrong and evil.
And I still don't see the point of your post - words can be used in different ways... so what?

I think it's a rationalization for his point of view.

Anyways, just because he didn't want to betray him, doesn't mean he's being good.

Originally posted by Legend Of Chibi
Anyways, just because he didn't want to betray him, doesn't mean he's being good.

OK, you lost me. I don't think we are going to get anywhere.

Nevermind

Originally posted by Superfly4000
i agree with the possibility that there is a univrsal god who comes in different forms to different cultures and to a certain degree believe that gods represent different aspects of the scientific world. But the idea of one special god thats better than all other gods is pure nonsense. The reason for why science is more efficient than philosophy and religion is that

A: it gives answers
& B: can be proven more than once

But you understand that when you say that science is more efficient than religion, its just because you believe this as a religious person believes in God right ?

That was my point, in the end its all about faith. Science, religion, and philosophy are just different models, but who gives sense to them is us, and we made that by our intuition, and faith only, not proof. Proof is only the place were we do start to make deductions, but first we have to believe that proof have sense.