Naga Sadow

I made a thread similar to this one a long time ago. In KOTOR, you can go to Naga's tomb, but it is the only one with no body inside. Naga also went to Yavin IV. He stayed their in suspended animation for 600 years before Nadd let him out. He then taught Nadd Ancient Sith Magic. Some people believe Nadd killed Sadow, but this doesn't seem likely. Do you think Naga is actually buried in an unexplored part of the tomb made to him, killed on Yavin IV, or still alive? If you have any other thoughts on this, please say them.

Know that I think about it, it doesn't make sense. Naga Sadow fled to Yavin lV with his Masassi after he was defeated in the war. He supposedly died there and was never seen from again. Maybe the tomb on Korriban was more of a monument to his memory the Sith built before they went completely extinct.

Or maybe it's just a flaw in the Editorial process.

Marka Ragnos, Tulak Hord and Ajunta Pall's tombs did not have bodies in them either.

The tomb of Ludo Kressh and Freddon Nadd did however.

Ya know it is spelled MarkO Ragnos, not MarkA.

No, no it's Marka Ragnos. Your spelling is a... flaw in the editorial process.

And Dimmamar brings up an excellent point- not all the 'tombs' had bodies. In fact, the only thing we have to indicate that they are meant to house bodies are the sarcophagi. Was there one in Sadow's tomb? If not, it could simply be a temple built in the area to celebrate a Sith lord who was thought dead in the Hyperspace War.

Play KOTOR again, go up to the tomb door, and look at the spelling, talk to ppl around the tomb, and listen for their pronounciation and spelling in the subtitles. It's spelled with an O.

Tell me then. Why does when you do a google search, if you type in MarkO it tries to correct it to Marka.

Because it thinks that how you spell it.

(baby voice) But I thought that KOTOR was Canon? 🙁

It is, kinda. Don't whisper that around Ush or he'll sic the chinchillas on you.

But it may very well be a typo of sorts. Every source I've seen uses Marka, even the comics.

Originally posted by Lord Janus
It is, kinda. Don't whisper that around Ush or he'll sic the chinchillas on you.

But it may very well be a typo of sorts. Every source I've seen uses Marka, even the comics.

Ush? Chinchillas? He doesn't have permission. I run the ChinArmy {tm}.

Perhaps they were not meant to be mausoleums, but monuments to the Dark Lords themselves?

Originally posted by Lord Janus
It is, kinda. Don't whisper that around Ush or he'll sic the chinchillas on you.

But it may very well be a typo of sorts. Every source I've seen uses Marka, even the comics.

No, KOTOR is not remotely canon. There is no leeway for the canonicity of EU, no matter how much anyone wishes it.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
No, KOTOR is not remotely canon. There is no leeway for the canonicity of EU, no matter how much anyone wishes it.

Anyone read the TOTJ comics about Naga sadow?

Originally posted by Tangible God
Probably is just a typo in the game, one used repeatedly in the game, but nonehteless. I've actually never read any book or comic concerning Marko, or Marka-----whatever.

No, it was "Marka" Ragnos in the TOTJ comics, which were published long before KotOR.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
No, KOTOR is not remotely canon. There is no leeway for the canonicity of EU, no matter how much anyone wishes it.

Why would it be in the Databank if it were not canon? I think that you are mistaken there.

Don't argue Ush on this one. It'll end in a quick retort and a closed thread. Let's avoid arguing canon issues, since it seems that this is a cardinal sin here at KMC. Even if we apply it only to our own debates, like we do over in the Versus Thread.

Isn't that rather arrogant and petty? I'm merely raising a valid issue.

Originally posted by Dimmimar
Isn't that rather arrogant and petty? I'm merely raising a valid issue.

It is, but rules are rules.

And it is MARKA Ragnos. Go read the comics, boys.