Jesus Christ

Started by Alliance208 pages

Maybe Christ is like an STD.

Originally posted by Alliance
Maybe Christ is like an STD.

A burning one or an itching one?

my mistake these comments deserve... wait... what is worse than a plague... eternal damnation maybe... oh wait we are all getting that anyways... oh well i don't know...

you're off topic...get back to sex and STDs.

my bad...

so which one is your favorite... god, the holy spirit, or jesus... 😆

many people claim they are the same.

The Holy Spirit if it comes in a bottle.

Thats "Holy Spirits" my friend.

Originally posted by Alliance
Thats "Holy Spirits" my friend.

Of course. I always get those two confused.

Many people do.

Originally posted by Alliance
It hasn't been the first time its been made...

What to you think all those religious people are talking about when they are "feeling Christ inside"?


thats just wrong in so many ways.

Except...its perfect.

Divine really.

And it isn't so odd. Back in Roman times one of the reasons why Christians were distrusted was because the way they worded things sounded wrong to pagan sensibilities - one often brought up the use of wine and bread to symbolise Blood and flesh - why those Christians are going around drinking blood and eating human flesh. Tch tch.

Not to mention that they sat ontop of posts and fasted.

And they refused to give into Roman religious syncretism.

And they didn't recognize the Imperial cult.

ok, question. how do you KNOW FOR A FACT that everything documented about the romans is true?

We don't, however, a good historian can sift through information...and on the Romans, there is A LOT.

If you want a more detailed explination on how we do it, i can let you know.

i know there are documented records, but how do you know they are true? you question the bible because you cant see or feel god, and you think it is a load of crap. how do you know that the roman history isnt the same?

Roman history is documented my multiple sources that originated independantly of eachother.

We also have access to original manuscripts, and there is often archeological evidence supporting its claims.

The Bible's original manuscript is nowhere to be found, it is the ONLY original source, and nothing it says (concerning spirituality) is documented anywhere else. Such is true with most religous texts.

these "original manuscripts", how do you know that they are accurate?

Because they are dated...and those dates are verified.