Again, Jesus Christ was GIVEN by God the qualities similar to God since God had GIVEN Him all the authorities in heaven and on earth. Only God can GIVE someone those authorities because those authorities are inherent to Him. On the other hand, no God can be GIVEN any authorities; for what is needed to be GIVEN to a God?
Wrong, he cant have all the qualities of God or even similar if he was created a little lower than the angels. He didnt get that authority until after he died.
With those authorities GIVEN by God to our Lord Jesus Christ, it is "by form" ... or "by nature" Christ was found as similar to God. As what I have emphasized earlier... it is not the literal sense that Christ was found in "by very nature God" ... since God is literally a Spirit and without form like Jesus had... the passage in Philippians only means that Jesus Christ has qualities GIVEN to Him by God. And since He had these qualities similar to God, Jesus still remained to be in a form of a "servant" - being obedient to God's will - this was the truest sense of HUMILITY.
Incorrect, that is absolutely not how the passage reads. The passage reads that he was found in the form of god and felt it not a robbery to be considered equal with God. But being made in human likeness, humbled himself. Having the form of God is clearly mentioned as having been before he humbled himself. Yet as a man, he was made lower than the angels from the beginning.
Remember that: There is only one God. If we think that Jesus as God and the One who incarnated into a human flesh, we would contradict the very truth that the Father is the only true God. When it is said that the Father is the ONLY true God, it tags the truth that the Son and the holy Spirit are not. And accepting without conceding that these three are parts of one God, why would Jesus declare that the Father is the only true God? Shouldn't He declare that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are One true God if it is what the Bible is trying to say?And to think that Jesus is God and took Himself in the form of a servant... contradicts your own contention that Jesus is not exactly God.
Nobody is arguing that there is more than one God, so there is no reason to maintain that argument. The son is the exact representation of the Father, he is not another God. The Father never changed either, never claimed that. Jesus humbled himself and the Father sends him. Thats why.
Jesus is the exact representation of, yet NOT the Father. So what exactly does that contradict? When I said he wasnt exactly God, again ive already explained why I said that. Beyond which, God is usually refered to as the Father and I wanted to make the distinction that Ive never called him the Father. Always the SON. 🙂