The Official KMC "Conspiracy" Thread

Started by GCG115 pages
Originally posted by Grand Moff Gav

Anyway I'm glad your cleared up what the phrase meant. I as refering to GCG's post. It didn't seem lilkley that he was here to debate conspiricy theroies.

I take my time to read and even more to verify and understand. We do have the luxury of writing posts and return to them some 24 hours later unlike when having a conversation vis-a-vis in tempos realis.

After all thats what forums are for.

Originally posted by Deano
Annuit Coeptis Novus Ordo Seclorum - Announcing the Conquest of the Secular New World

release that anger slowly ush

Coeptis means oblterate.

Originally posted by KidRock
Whats even FUNNIER is that you cant see how Britain is the U.S.'s lapdog. Fetch the bone.

Bush's lapdog not America's learn that. And like anydog we will obey the master untill we stop getting fed!

Lapdog, isn't that like a small pet that sits in the lap of it's master and does what ever the master tells it to do?

Sounds like your typical US Republican, Bush supporter to me.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Lapdog, isn't that like a small pet that sits in the lap of it's master and does what ever the master tells it to do?

Sounds like your typical US Republican, Bush supporter to me.

I never said our bite was too good.....but in packs say EU or Commonwealth well

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Lapdog, isn't that like a small pet that sits in the lap of it's master and does what ever the master tells it to do?

Sounds like your typical US Republican, Bush supporter to me.

yeh quite disturbing

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Interpretation is one thing, Deano. Simply making up a completely different meaning is another. There is no secular. There is no conquest.

be a man, and admit you have trusted a source that was wrong.

I don't see that happening anytime soon, Deano is pretty defensive about his bogus, misguided and misinformed websites.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
I don't see that happening anytime soon, Deano is pretty defensive about his bogus, misguided and misinformed websites.

i'll admit when im wrong when you admit that 9/11 was an inside job.

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=85019
THE BEST 9.11 VIDEO I'VE SEEN

Originally posted by Deano
i'll admit when im wrong when you admit that 9/11 was an inside job.

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=85019
THE BEST 9.11 VIDEO I'VE SEEN

So you equate wanting someone to admit to a theory that you believe in (which is ridiculous at best) to you admitting to being wrong after you have been proven wrong?

You are a complete fool.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
So you equate wanting someone to admit to a theory that you believe in (which is ridiculous at best) to you admitting to being wrong after you have been proven wrong?

You are a complete fool.

Once again.........what can I say...

jerry

Originally posted by KharmaDog
The set-up and take down. Very nice. clapping

Excellent logic Gav, but don't respect a logical answer. This issue has been raised before to no avail.

Originally posted by Deano

Look at the translation given here Deano!

If you don't understand what I'm asking then you will noitice that this page translates the term "Annuit Coeptis" you translated it as "Annoncing Conquest" you then wrongly added the phrase "Novus Ordo Seclorum"
Anniut does not mean Annonce that is annuntio !
Coeptis means -- to begin, undertake
Novus means-- new, fresh, young,
Ordo means -- rank, class, order

Seclorum is a shortened form of the word seculorum meaning generations, centuries, ages.

The date at the base of the pyramid is NOT the formation of the Illuminati order but the date of the declaration of Independence.

"Annuit Cœptis" means "Providence has favored our undertakings" or "Providence favors our undertakings."

"Novus ordo seclorum" was not intended to mean (nor does it correctly translate into) "new world order." Seclorum is plural (new worlds order?). And Thomson said the motto refers to the new American era beginning in 1776. Also, "new world order" is originally an English phrase whose Latin translation would not be "novus ordo seclorum."

In short a repeat of what Ush poste earlier!

Originally posted by KharmaDog
So you equate wanting someone to admit to a theory that you believe in (which is ridiculous at best) to you admitting to being wrong after you have been proven wrong?

You are a complete fool.

opinions opinions opinions

you are a waste of space.

Originally posted by Deano
opinions opinions opinions
So you equate wanting someone to admit to a theory that you believe in (which is ridiculous at best) to you admitting to being wrong after you have been proven wrong?

This is not an opinion, it is an observation based on your behaviour and request.

You are a complete fool.

This is also not an opinon as it is a conclusion based on your behaviour and request.

thats YOUR conclusion, and opinion. i also share the same opinion of yourself.

Originally posted by Deano
thats YOUR conclusion, and opinion. i also share the same opinion of yourself.

these "i know you are, but what am i" comebacks, in their many manifestations, just get funnier every time. [/sarcasm]

Originally posted by PVS
these "i know you are, but what am i" comebacks, in their many manifestations, just get funnier every time. [/sarcasm]

Deano, that was weak, homes.