Originally posted by lord xyz
These eye witnesses actually did see what hit the pentagon
blue, is there anything we can agree on? 🙄
Originally posted by lord xyz
These eye witnesses actually did see what hit the pentagon
blue, is there anything we can agree on? 🙄
* Review the facts
* Size of 757 matches the initial size of hole in the building - somewhere between 13 and 16 feet (757 is 13 feet wide/high)
* Rims found in building match those of a 757
* Small turbine engine outside is an APU
* Same engine has been clearly stated to not match a Global Hawk engine
* Blue seats from 757 laying on ground in photos
* Part of "American" fuselage logo visible in more than 1 photo
* Engine parts photographed inside match a Rolls-Royce RB211
* Structural components photographed in wreckage match Boeing paint primer schemes
* Large deisel generator in front of building hit by a large heavy object
* Large deisel engine outside is spun towards the building - could not be result of bomb blast or missile explosion
* Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner
* Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner hit the Pentagon
* 60+ bodies, matching the passenger list and flight crew roster identified and returned to families from Pentagon wreckage
Originally posted by lord xyz
* Review the facts
* Size of 757 matches the initial size of hole in the building - somewhere between 13 and 16 feet (757 is 13 feet wide/high)
And what about the width, Including the wings?
Originally posted by lord xyz
[B
* Rims found in building match those of a 757
* Small turbine engine outside is an APU
* Same engine has been clearly stated to not match a Global Hawk engine
* Blue seats from 757 laying on ground in photos
* Part of "American" fuselage logo visible in more than 1 photo
* Engine parts photographed inside match a Rolls-Royce RB211
* Structural components photographed in wreckage match Boeing paint primer schemes
* Large deisel generator in front of building hit by a large heavy object
* Large deisel engine outside is spun towards the building - could not be result of bomb blast or missile explosion[/B]
And the wings?
Originally posted by lord xyz
* Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner
* Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner hit the Pentagon
* 60+ bodies, matching the passenger list and flight crew roster identified and returned to families from Pentagon wreckage
Eyewitness doesn't mean jack.
oh, so, if I see a plane hit the pentagon, that doesn't mean anything?
here's my theory on the wings, but there is a lot of evidence on the wings.
1. The left wing hit two lamposts. When wings (and engines) hit lamposts, they break apart and fall behind creating an explosion which destroyes the back of the plane, speeds up the plane, (this would explain the neat hole caused by the nose of the plane,) and causes the plane to tilt to the left because there is no left wing. (This could be before it hit the pentagon.)
2. If the plane was tilted then the right wing would be at an angle, and if you look at the pentagon, you'll see a nice line coming from the hole, and this hole is the same length as a Boeing 757 wing! And isn't it just coincidence, that there were engine-like explosions heard (and the effects have been witnesssed) at that area??? Don't you think this makes sense?
So I've mentioned, the wings, the tail, the neat hole, the 2 explosions heard, the exploision to the right of the hole, and something else I think. It all fits.
Originally posted by lord xyz
oh, so, if I see a plane hit the pentagon, that doesn't mean anything?
It's not that, it's just you can't come to a conclusion based on eyewitness accounts only.
Originally posted by lord xyz
1. The left wing hit two lamposts. When wings (and engines) hit lamposts, they break apart and fall behind creating an explosion which destroyes the back of the plane, speeds up the plane, (this would explain the neat hole caused by the nose of the plane,) and causes the plane to tilt to the left because there is no left wing. (This could be before it hit the pentagon.)
this is going to turn out the same way as the ID thread where, I use the logical one with lots of evidence and supporters, and you just say "I don't believe you." so I'm not going to debate you Blue, and you still haven't commented on what I said about the right wing. Why don't you reply to all I say?
Originally posted by lord xyz
this is going to turn out the same way as the ID thread where, I use the logical one with lots of evidence and supporters, and you just say "I don't believe you." so I'm not going to debate you Blue, and you still haven't commented on what I said about the right wing. Why don't you reply to all I say?
Right lots of evidence 🙄 , I just asked you to show me any wing debris and you still haven't posted, and a lamp post ripping the wings w/e.
Heres my conspiracy
DEANO IS A ROBOT !!!!
Just think about it for a second or two , the government sends in a robot who reveals half of the government's secret plans but makes the guy who reveal them sound like a complete crackpot (No offence deano) so we discredit his theories and ignore any eventuality that the things he spouts are true . Then when were completely unwary.....
BAM.
Lizardmen/Taliban/Satanic invasion .
Originally posted by grey fox
Heres my conspiracyDEANO IS A ROBOT !!!!
Just think about it for a second or two , the government sends in a robot who reveals half of the government's secret plans but makes the guy who reveal them sound like a complete crackpot (No offence deano) so we discredit his theories and ignore any eventuality that the things he spouts are true . Then when were completely unwary.....
BAM.
Lizardmen/Taliban/Satanic invasion .
I'll give deano some credit, he can tolerate being called a robot 🙁