no its not infatuation I just find it confusing (Alan Partridge joke)
Seriously though whats the point from a biological point of view, I know many do procreate - So if it is genetic and their is evidence it is, the "gay gene" gets passed on, but it is not a gays primary drive like it can easily be argued it is for straights (at least until recent years). So do gays offer something, Meer Cats have a carer class, which do not procreate, this is not uncommon in mammals. I woould suggest the education system has more homosexuals than most other professions - do Gays often serve a "carer" role in humanity.
sidebar - Why are people inferring my interest in "gayness" might be an insult do they consider calling a straight guy "gay" an insult? 😕
One thing I will never, ever, ever understand in the entire timespan of my life, is why guys say that homosexuals are disgusting.
"Yuk! Sleeping with other men?! Gross!"
What? You WANT men to go around having sex with women? Surely you would be glad that the straight male to straight female ratio was more in the male favour.
It's like girls who dislike lesbians. Surely you'd be glad there's more men available.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
One thing I will never, ever, ever understand in the entire timespan of my life, is why guys say that homosexuals are disgusting."Yuk! Sleeping with other men?! Gross!"
What? You WANT men to go around having sex with women? Surely you would be glad that the straight male to straight female ratio was more in the male favour.
It's like girls who dislike lesbians. Surely you'd be glad there's more men available.
-AC
All true but do they serve a biological purpose.
Perhaps AC is right the gene serves to provide more choice and opportunity for straight men - no, no because lesbians exist, they must have a more complex function - back to the carer concept perhaps.
"I woould suggest the education system has more homosexuals than most other professions"
What the bloody hell is this nonsense?
Like the thread, nonsense in of itself- as if biologicalmpurpose matters.
These continuous threads of yours are very tiresome, Whirly. Make one damn thread and ask all your questions in there.
Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
no its not infatuation I just find it confusing (Alan Partridge joke)Seriously though whats the point from a biological point of view, I know many do procreate - So if it is genetic and their is evidence it is, the "gay gene" gets passed on, but it is not a gays primary drive like it can easily be argued it is for straights (at least until recent years). So do gays offer something, Meer Cats have a carer class, which do not procreate, this is not uncommon in mammals. I woould suggest the education system has more homosexuals than most other professions - do Gays often serve a "carer" role in humanity.
sidebar - Why are people inferring my interest in "gayness" might be an insult do they consider calling a straight guy "gay" an insult? 😕
Originally posted by Ushgarak
"I woould suggest the education system has more homosexuals than most other professions"What the bloody hell is this nonsense?
Like the thread, nonsense in of itself- as if biologicalmpurpose matters.
These continuous threads of yours are very tiresome, Whirly. Make one damn thread and ask all your questions in there.
OK I will, I apologise.
As my thread to post ratio shows I rarely make threads, I don't understand why I felt the need for a spree.
Originally posted by UshgarakDitto. Tedious. And it's pretty obvious "why you felt the need for a spree".
What the bloody hell is this nonsense?Like the thread, nonsense in of itself- as if biologicalmpurpose matters.
These continuous threads of yours are very tiresome, Whirly. Make one damn thread and ask all your questions in there.
Originally posted by finti
Wrongs aint the deal here it is whether a group serves a bilogocal purpose
however sterile people definately do not serve any purpose from a biological point of view in terms of procreation. The difference is sterility is normally in genetic terms the result of an unfavourable mistake. Gays I think would argue they are not a mistake, so if they are not a mistake what purpose do they serve?