Originally posted by finti
serve just as much purpose as those who dont want to reproduce and those who cant, which again is they (all of them)serve a purpose and that purpose is to inflict on others lifes whatever way they can
I see so you see no evidence for procreation as the main drive for sex in humans 😕 i see, thank you for your contribution.
I see so you see no evidence for procreation as the main drive for sex in humanswell after you are in a comitted relationship procreationn is a part of the sex part, it aint the main part though...the main part of sex is sex in itself.
Originally posted by finti
well after you are in a comitted relationship procreationn is a part of the sex part, it aint the main part though...the main part of sex is sex in itself.
If you are not in a relationship the main part is to get laid as often as possible
yes this is a biological drive aimed at procreation, this is why most men want sex with women and even there mastabatory fanasies are centred on women, as women are the recepticles of seed and other half of the genetic information required to produce a zygote. again thank you for your contribution.
For someone who is so profoundly educated, enjoying an advanced degree in micro biology, as you stated in your multiple PMs...perhaps you should share your well-educated insight on the subject.
As Xmarks said, the reason for your rash of threads regarding homosexuality is pretty apparent. You seem to think that creating multiple threads on homosexuality, and small minded bigots sharing their opinions, is going to hurt my feelings...or irritate me in some way...or embarass me? This is not the case.
But, perhaps turn about is fair play.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
For someone who is so profoundly educated, enjoying an advanced degree in micro biology, as you stated in your multiple PMs...perhaps you should share your well-educated insight on the subject.As Xmarks said, the reason for your rash of threads regarding homosexuality is pretty apparent. You seem to think that creating multiple threads on homosexuality, and small minded bigots sharing their opinions, is going to hurt my feelings...or irritate me in some way...or embarass me? This is not the case.
But, perhaps turn about is fair play.
actually its molecular biology - my special interest is enzymes
my knowledge of micro is very limited 🙂
you see you never understand anything.
This threads not about you🙂
please contribute I would be interested in your insights as to biologically what purpose you feel you serve as a gay man 🙂
Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
true enough and from a biological standpoint heterosexual sex is the only way we can reproduce.
yes, the same as a virus. but how do we benefit anything but ourselves? reproduction is only self beneficial, and due to our skyrocketing world population, quite unnecessary on the scale it exists at.
if anything, i think homosexuality is a blessing to mankind. thats a percentage of people who (mostly) wont reproduce and add to an already overabundant world population, which in turn saves resources for the rest of us.
Originally posted by PVS
yes, the same as a virus. but how do we benefit anything but ourselves? reproduction is only self beneficial, and due to our skyrocketing world population, quite unnecessary on the scale it exists at.if anything, i think homosexuality is a blessing to mankind. thats a percentage of people who (mostly) wont reproduce and add to an already overabundant world population, which in turn saves resources for the rest of us.
PVS I am sure you realise its debateable if a virus is alive as outside a host it is inert and it actually has few characteristics of a living organism, in the traditional sense.
So Homosexual slow down overcrowding by being an evolutionary dead end?
or are you saying they are like a fire break against the ever expanding population.
Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
As I stated is that why some are bisexual, If it turns out the gay gene is part of a mosaic complex, this could be how it happens.
"Gay gene". I guess that's like the "homocidal gene" in serial killers, right? It's developed. Mass murderers don't come out of the womb slinging a knife, as homosexual males come out grabbing at their Dad's crotch. Why else would you delay your instinctual urge to act on this supposed genetic imbalance until you're almost fully developed physically?
Prove to me the "homosexual gene" exists, and I'll shut up. It's an imbalance, but not a genetic one.
But to answer the question, homosexuals don't serve any biological purpose or physiological need. But, as pointed out before, it doesn't really matter. Straight people who don't engage in sexual activities are rendered equally as useless in the way of "purpose".
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
"Gay gene". I guess that's like the "homocidal gene" in serial killers, right?Mass murderers don't come out of the womb slinging a knife, as homosexual males come out grabbing at their Dad's crotch.
Prove to me the "homosexual gene" exists, and I'll shut up. It's an imbalance, but not a genetic one.
Look over the chosen or genetic thread. There is quite a bit of evidence posted in that thread.
Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
PVS I am sure you realise its debateable if a virus is alive as outside a host it is inert and it actually has few characteristics of a living organism, in the traditional sense.
So Homosexual slow down overcrowding by being an evolutionary dead end?
or are you saying they are like a fire break against the ever expanding population.
its not an evolutionary dead end because gay people will always be a minority.
and if it WAS a matter of evolution and there was in fact a "gay gene" you should still find comfort in the fact that most gay people dont have offspring.
so any "gay gene" would be well contained, correct?
all im saying is they cut the poulation a bit. nothing significant im sure, but certainly nothing harmful.
and for the life of me, i cant see why people feel so threatened by gay people.
as if they somehow can brainwash everyone else into being gay, and destroy the human race
.
when you think about it, they have the least impact/threat on society in that they rarely raise children. meanwhile millions of straight 'family oriented' and 'godfearing' parents are neglecting their children, who will one day smoke crack and carjack/shoot me.
lets have some sense of priority is all im saying.