Biologically speaking do gays serve any purpose

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
I agree and created a thread where he could do just that but he trolled it and it was shut 😐

Lie

Originally posted by Echuu
You still don't seem to understand that I was JOKING.

oh ok. just remember, playful gestures and a sarcastic tone are impossible to pick up when reading text.

Originally posted by Great Vengeance
Technically it does, animals in nature are supposed to reproduce and that is rather hard with two males.

reason for this thread 🙁 so do they have a biological reason

Originally posted by PVS
oh ok. just remember, playful gestures and a sarcastic tone are impossible to pick up when reading text.

especially when one uses the wrong smilie......

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
I agree and created a thread where he could do just that but he trolled it and it was shut 😐

I didn't get it shut, you did...simply by starting it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Lie

on what do you base this - I have stated I have no problem with homosexuality 🙂 and I don't!

Originally posted by PVS
well you have a point in that i find it sickening because i know the definition.
before i knew, it was just another hateful word. i just didnt realise how low it went. but like i said, i find one term more offensive than the other. its all subjective, as you yourself know that many gay men playfully call eachother 'f@g'. maybe because they never learned what it means either...who knows.

Cheers, as long as we understand one another.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
I didn't get it shut, you did...simply by starting it.

I think someone complained about it or a post - who knows who that could be

Originally posted by PVS
oh ok. just remember, playful gestures and a sarcastic tone are impossible to pick up when reading text.

gotcha 😎

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
on what do you base this - I have stated I have no problem with homosexuality 🙂 and I don't!

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
I agree and created a thread where he could do just that but he trolled it and it was shut 😐

So, I should be grateful to you for starting a thread that encourages people to post as many derrogatory terms for gay people as they can think of? That's total BS

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
So, I should be grateful to you for starting a thread that encourages people to post as many derrogatory terms for gay people as they can think of? That's total BS

- that wasn't the point it asked why were there so many - I was attempting to explain the hate of gays by some individuals 😐

You can thank me if you wish 🙂

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
So, I should be grateful to you for starting a thread that encourages people to post as many derrogatory terms for gay people as they can think of? That's total BS

he's heterosexual...you should be grateful he's even talking to you 🤨

Originally posted by Bardock42
because it is wrong and you should know it 🙂

Being gay is not wrong Bardock, its unelightened thinking to suppose it is imo 😐

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
I think someone complained about it or a post - who knows who that could be

Oh, I reported it. No question about that. But I didn't "troll" it. All of your gay themed threads have been a direct attack on me because I called you out in the holocaust thread.

You don't see me starting threadsd like:

Biologically speaking, what purpose does a gypsy with no children serve?

OR

How many derrogatory terms for someone with dyslexia can you think of?

OR

Can dumbass Gypsies act gay?

And the only reason I didn't report the others is because they weren't offensive to an entire protion of the population. But when you basically start a thread where everyone is encouraged to post insults, it isn't just me you're insulting anymore. A similar thread about black people being called n*ggers would have met teh same fate.

Unecessary and rude.

Here is a big thread about homosexuality - homosexuality - chosen or genetic

Please use it.

Closing.