Should HIGH SCHOOL and COLLEGES give out Condoms?

Originally posted by FeceMan
I just assume that he is a moron. All he does is ***** about the "Man-Spider" movies.

cri more n00b

Nope he'S also crying aboot Pierce Brosnan as Bond and Keaton as Batman.......

Originally posted by KILLBILLFREAK
See that's another thing i did know there was so many kinds of Condoms{size, i knew there were flavors} why isn't Sex ed telling all of this

Cause that is not like the important thing in Sex Ed.......

You should learn how it works and how one can protect themself......yeah..that'S aboot it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Cause that is not like the important thing in Sex Ed.......

You should learn how it works and how one can protect themself......yeah..that'S aboot it.

They do a bad job at that to{ Showing what is the risks aree having unprotected sex} example they did not tell us about there is 80 kinds of HPV, i did not know you can get bumps lumps and rashes on the penis, until i found that out myself, Plus they did show us how to put a condom but what's the best kind? How do you put it on when you have foreskin? how do you know what size to get?

Originally posted by KILLBILLFREAK
I was just wanting to have a debate on if it is a good idea to had out condoms to high school and college people. What do think about giving out condoms?

Sure i Guess.

I'm more worried about the concept of giving anything to the human race for free.

I read the topic, and I immedietly imagined a zillion condom ballons.

They shouldn't because its like promoting sex before marriage (which is bad i.m.o.). I mean if students have condums they are going to feel more "protected" and do it more often.

The reason schools feel they should give out condoms is because they feel that kids are going to do it anyways and if they are they might as well be protected.

I feel that if they give them out kids are going to have more of a urge to do it since they have a condom available.

In not aware of the laws regaurding condoms(if any) and correct if i'm wrong but I dont think condoms should be sold to anyone under 18.And if they are its just plain irresponible.

Wouldn't prohibiting the selling of condoms to people under-18 be a lot more irresponsible. If someone under 18 is intent on having sex, they're likely going to have sex regardless. By banning the selling of condoms to them all you'd be doing is ensuring that people under 18, who are having sex and are responsible enough to use protection, have unsafe sex.

In the area around my school, they don't have to. The local hospital gives them out for free to any teenagers asking for them.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Wouldn't prohibiting the selling of condoms to people under-18 be a lot more irresponsible. If someone under 18 is intent on having sex, they're likely going to have sex regardless. By banning the selling of condoms to them all you'd be doing is ensuring that people under 18, who are having sex and are responsible enough to use protection, have unsafe sex.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Wouldn't prohibiting the selling of child pornography to anyone be a lot more irresponsible? If someone is intent on looking at child pornography, he or she is likely to go and look at child pornography regardless. By banning the selling of child pornography to him or her, all you are doing is ensuring that people who want to look at child pornography, who are looking at child pornography and responsible enough not to go child molesting, are doing so illegally.

But as I said, the best thing would probably be to just sell condoms at a much lower price. Rather then make schools responsible for handing out condoms because they cannot keep up with the supply and demand, nor should they be required too, and this way, if teens want to have sex, they atleast can have protection at a more reasonable price. This helps adults too.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Wouldn't prohibiting the selling of condoms to people under-18 be a lot more irresponsible. If someone under 18 is intent on having sex, they're likely going to have sex regardless. By banning the selling of condoms to them all you'd be doing is ensuring that people under 18, who are having sex and are responsible enough to use protection, have unsafe sex.

Most kids wont have sex if they dont have the protection against having a child.

Originally posted by KILLBILLFREAK
See that's another thing i did know there was so many kinds of Condoms{size, i knew there were flavors} why isn't Sex ed telling all of this

It's really quite fascinating, and useful to know really.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Wouldn't prohibiting the selling of child pornography to anyone be a lot more irresponsible? If someone is intent on looking at child pornography, he or she is likely to go and look at child pornography regardless. By banning the selling of child pornography to him or her, all you are doing is ensuring that people who want to look at child pornography, who are looking at child pornography and responsible enough not to go child molesting, are doing so illegally.

How relevant is that to the discussion? 🙄

Originally posted by silver_tears
How relevant is that to the discussion? 🙄

Originally posted by silver_tears
It's really quite fascinating, and useful to know really.

Originally posted by Cringe
Most kids wont have sex if they dont have the protection against having a child.

Originally posted by X-Woman
They shouldn't because its like promoting sex before marriage (which is bad i.m.o.). I mean if students have condums they are going to feel more "protected" and do it more often.

So you all want to DIE

Please ingore what i said just doing that for my sign thing thank u

Even if your friends do.I still think the rate would go war down if the kids knew if they did it they could possibly have a child.The possibilty of the girl getting pregnant scares them most of the time.

Cringe says this:

Originally posted by Cringe
In not aware of the laws regaurding condoms(if any) and correct if i'm wrong but I dont think condoms should be sold to anyone under 18.And if they are its just plain irresponible.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Wouldn't prohibiting the selling of condoms to people under-18 be a lot more irresponsible. If someone under 18 is intent on having sex, they're likely going to have sex regardless. By banning the selling of condoms to them all you'd be doing is ensuring that people under 18, who are having sex and are responsible enough to use protection, have unsafe sex.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Wouldn't prohibiting the selling of child pornography to anyone be a lot more irresponsible? If someone is intent on looking at child pornography, he or she is likely to go and look at child pornography regardless. By banning the selling of child pornography to him or her, all you are doing is ensuring that people who want to look at child pornography, who are looking at child pornography and responsible enough not to go child molesting, are doing so illegally.

Originally posted by Cringe
Most kids wont have sex if they dont have the protection against having a child.

Originally posted by Cringe
Even if your friends do.I still think the rate would go war down if the kids knew if they did it they could possibly have a child.The possibilty of the girl getting pregnant scares them most of the time.