Cyclops vs. Storm

Started by Creshosk42 pages

Originally posted by HandOfFate
LOL, just give me the link or picture showing me where the visor is thought controlled. Simple
You have yet to prove your case.

Its a wiki, therefore is questionable validity and I will not accept it. So until you prove your case mine stands. I did after all ask you for proof of your statement of fact as opposed to my inductive reasoning.

I'm not claiming mine as fact. you however stated something that is now under scrutiny.

A wiki is NOT a valid source of information.

Since the coding is copied from wikipedia, and likewise can be edited by anyone, it is no more valid than wikipedia or urban dictionary, or uncyclopedia or encyclopedia dramatica.

Whatever dude, give proof that the visor is thought controlled or 30 something pages on this thread have been in vain and somewhat misleading.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
Whatever dude, give proof that the visor is thought controlled or 30 something pages on this thread have been in vain and somewhat misleading.
Why should I when you won't do the same?

As I've said I'm using inductive reasoning.

But I'm sure you don't know what that means.

Meanwhile you have yet to prove what you've claimed as fact.

The Visor isn't thought controlled. He has a switch in his gloves that puts it on or off. I'll look for the scan

There i also a switch on the side to put it on or of, he doesn't touch the side of his head when he blasts to direct it you know

Originally posted by Peterlane
The Visor isn't thought controlled. He has a switch in his gloves that puts it on or off. I'll look for the scan
Thank you.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Why should I when you won't do the same?

As I've said I'm using inductive reasoning.

But I'm sure you don't know what that means.

Meanwhile you have yet to prove what you've claimed as fact.

I do not have to prove anything...people said his visor is thought controlled and I asked for proof.

Why don't you ask the people who made the statement? If you don't have the information I'm looking for then we have nothing to talk about. No disrespect, just trying to get to the button of this statement.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
I do not have to prove anything...
You made a claim.
from the rules thread:
Also, we insist that all claims be backed up by evidence from canon sources. If you claim that Spiderman is stronger than Superman, then you have to prove it.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
people said his visor is thought controlled and I asked for proof.
I said I 'm using inductive reasoning.. you know fsorta like the conclusion of any match that hasn't been done in a canon comic book.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
Why don't you ask the people who made the statement? If you don't have the information I'm looking for then we have nothing to talk about. No disrespect, just trying to get to the button of this statement.
Because its not my job to challenge my own side for evidence. I do however get to challenge the opposing side.

For me its inductive reasoning that leads to that conclusion. Its really not that far fetched given the technology(cerebro) available.

Originally posted by Creshosk
You made a claim.
from the rules thread:

I said I 'm using inductive reasoning.. you know fsorta like the conclusion of any match that hasn't been done in a canon comic book.

Because its not my job to challenge my own side for evidence. I do however get to challenge the opposing side.

For me its inductive reasoning that leads to that conclusion. Its really not that far fetched given the technology(cerebro) available.

Dude, either you have the information I'm looking for or not.

I will not play this around and around pointless conversation with you.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
Dude, either you have the information I'm looking for or not.
Are you not capable of reading what I wrote?

Originally posted by HandOfFate
I will not play this around and around pointless conversation with you.
Apparently you will, because I've answered you at least three times now. You have yet to be as courteous.

And I already showed you a post from the rules thread

Also, we insist that all claims be backed up by evidence from canon sources. If you claim that Spiderman is stronger than Superman, then you have to prove it.
So you have no problems breaking the rules? even one that as soft as this?

I should put you on ignore for trolling. Since its clear that's all you're doing.

Now, I will ask you again. Provide evidence for your claim or concede the point.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Are you not capable of reading what I wrote?

Apparently you will, because I've answered you at least three times now. You have yet to be as courteous.

And I already showed you a post from the rules thread

So you have no problems breaking the rules? even one that as soft as this?

I should put you on ignore for trolling. Since its clear that's all you're doing.

Now, I will ask you again. Provide evidence for your claim or concede the point.

I gave you proof from Marvel's own site, you decide it wasn't good enough for you...so this conversation is over....Thanks

P.S. I like how you call it trolling when all I'm looking for is proof....which your side hasn't given yet. Nice

Double standards much. 😉

Originally posted by HandOfFate
I gave you proof from Marvel's own site,
Wiki's are not acceptable evidence. Therefor you have provided no valid proof.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
you decide it wasn't good enough for you...so this conversation is over....Thanks
Right and you're trolling then.

Wiki's are not valid proof

Provide valid proof.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
P.S. I like how you call it trolling when all I'm looking for is proof....which your side hasn't given yet. Nice
Yeah, I call it wahat it is. You're demanding evidence but refusing to give anythign valid. I've already told you mine is inductive.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
Double standards much. 😉
Only from you.

I'm going to say that with as hard as you're trying to NOT provide proof the more reasonable explanation (That its thought controlled, so that it requires less technology and is therefore simpler, as per Occam's razor) that it's thought controlled is more likely to be accurate and that the button in the thumb (Which can be accidentally pressed so is once again less logical).

Cyclops wins this with a thought. Its the more logical, reasonable choice.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
LOL, just give me the link or picture showing me where the visor is thought controlled. Simple

* i hope these links help:

http://www.geocities.com/sikelops/cyclops1c.htm
http://xpg.us/cerebra/display.php?id=1200
http://www.itog.com/item_info.pl?id=142205
http://www.bharatstudent.com/blogs/viewblog.php?blogid=8231&mode=blog

Originally posted by peejayd
* i hope these links help:

http://www.geocities.com/sikelops/cyclops1c.htm
http://xpg.us/cerebra/display.php?id=1200
http://www.itog.com/item_info.pl?id=142205
http://www.bharatstudent.com/blogs/viewblog.php?blogid=8231&mode=blog

Not really but thanks. 😄

P.S. None of them are offical Marvel sites.

I'll look it up myself....thanks

Slight edit

Originally posted by HandOfFate
P.S. None of them are offical Marvel sites.
That's what I was thinking. But as I said before it wasn't my job to say so.

I looked through them however hoping the sources would be cited.

Originally posted by Creshosk
I looked through them however hoping the sources would be cited.

Me too.

wow scot is still running for his life? lmao

No, Storm's unconscious.

LOL, what she took a nab after she shocked Cyke into unconsciousness.

Originally posted by HandOfFate
LOL, what she took a nab after she shocked Cyke into unconsciousness.
In her dream she shocked cycke. The nap was induced by an optic blast to the noggin.

* aw! stop this! go here: http://www.100megspop3.com/scottororo/index.html and let the love begin! 😛