Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
If I type this all up is it actually going to be read? I mean, moreso than normal.Also:
The logical fallacy is denying the antecedent.
Denying the antecedent is a logical fallacy, committed by reasoning in the form:If P, then Q.
Not P.
Therefore, not Q.If Queen Elizabeth is an American citizen, then she is a human being.
Queen Elizabeth is not an American citizen.
Therefore, Queen Elizabeth is not a human being.
You've used this so many times. 🙄
Throw this in the mix too
http://img89.imageshack.us/my.php?image=feelinghurricaneva2.jpg
Originally posted by 2damnloud
talk
I was clearly superior in my arguments and backed it with scans.This is why I always say "anyone with sense......"
Sadly, the wackydom of KMC doesn't apply to the real world 🙁😆
Originally posted by 2damnloud
The logical fallacy is denying the antecedent.You've used this so many times. 🙄
You never answered the question of whether or not you're going to actually read into my analysis of all these scans.
Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
None of that isn't anything new though. She's done similar things in the past. The H-bomb I thought was a bit much and the hydrogen thing didn't really make sense but slapping the back of an energy being and disassembling hydro-man should of been cake walk.
Do you have an actual point?
Your assertion is based off a twist of your own words? She accelerates weather at an unnatural rate but still within "normal" parameters. If you set up the perfect conditions for something to occur and/or coax it along, that event will happen far faster than it would normally.Under your methods, it seems as if I should be sitting here wondering why she didn't end the Civil War by warping reality or why she doesn't stop Hulk by simply erasing him. She did it there, she should do it here! Why doesn't she?
Originally posted by 2damnloud
What the hell are you waiting on!?!?!
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Do you have an actual point?
You wondered if your ranting on the writer forums had anything to do with Storm's accomplishments since then, thought you yourself doubt it.
I replied that Storm "hasn't done anything"
You said it was false then listed some things she's done.
I replied that they are nothing out of the ordinary.
"Hasn't done anything" wasn't meant to mean she literally sat in a closet and did nothing this entire time. It was meant as she hasn't done anything she hasn't been doing already.
All in all I was also agreeing with your doubts of whether or not you influenced the writers because her abilities remain unchanged.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Originally posted by 2damnloudOr so you think.. but now you're arguing against Storm's "not running roughshod over them" line.
I noticed noticed you use vague language like:If you set up the perfect conditions for something to occur and/or coax it along
Explain with a canonical example and corresponding, corroborating scientific.
Im putting your ass on the GRILL😈
or her "working within the elements".
way to attack your own arguments.
Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
How about the answer to the question I asked you twice now.*Picard sigh*
You wondered if your ranting on the writer forums had anything to do with Storm's accomplishments since then, thought you yourself doubt it.
I replied that Storm "hasn't done anything"
You said it was false then listed some things she's done.
I replied that they are nothing out of the ordinary.
"Hasn't done anything" wasn't meant to mean she literally sat in a closet and did nothing this entire time. It was meant as she hasn't done anything she hasn't been doing already.
All in all I was also agreeing with your doubts of whether or not you influenced the writers because her abilities remain unchanged.
Why don't you spell it out for us.
Yea, she's always taken control of Herald and elemental persons 🙄
Originally posted by Creshosk
Or so you think.. but now you're arguing against Storm's "not running roughshod over them" line.or her "working within the elements".
way to attack your own arguments.
Never asserted anything.
Sorry.
That's a fallacy anyway because we have to assume that an alternative to his ananlysis would entail running roughshod over the elements.
You're trying way too hard to be argumentative. 🙁
Originally posted by 2damnloudSo you never said that Storm has to work within the elements and not run roughshod over them like a big dumb animal?
Never asserted anything.[/b
Do you have a faulty memory or do you want me to dig up the quotes where you said these things?
Originally posted by 2damnloudHow is it a fallacy when its what storm stated and what you've been asserting?
[B]Sorry.That's a fallacy anyway because we have to assume that an alternative to his ananlysis would entail running roughshod over the elements.
Originally posted by 2damnloudNo, that'd be you.
You're trying way too hard to be argumentative. 🙁
You refuse to admit that Thor being able to do with a thought what storm has to work within the system entails that he's more powerful than she is. You refuse to acknowledge when Storm HAS tried to fight Thor she always loses.
You attack with veiled comments like the "That's what I mean by anyone with sense" and now you're going against things you already said just because someone welse said soemthing to the same effect which highlights Storm's limitations which you insist are self imposed and then you ignore the fact that CIS is valid in these forums even if PIS is not.
