Storm vs Thor

Started by 2damnloud38 pages

She hasn't died yet doing stuff that's>>>>Thor

LMAO

I don't aknowledge you , really, after you tried to spam the Storm rspect thread.

run along.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Waiting on your expert analysis, Swank.🙂
Still waiting on confirmation you're going to read it.

Personally I feel like he'd be wasting his time. You're working hard to ruin Storm's character even if you don't realize it. You give off the insinuation that Storm is incapable of feats of SMvFL or that any of her feats could be PIS.

And if he writes out his analysis you'll either come up with some lame excuses as to why you think he's wwrong (and ignore logic in the process) or just dismiss it with a flippant remark.

For arguing for Her so hard, you must hate her, for you do much to tarnish her reputation.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
She hasn't died yet doing stuff that's>>>>Thor

LMAO

I don't aknowledge you , really, after you tried to spam the Storm rspect thread.

run along.

Thank you for proving my point.

"or just dismiss it with a flippant remark."

really.........yet she almost became paralized doiing stuff thor could do well sleeping.............

which was stated that she can no longer push her self to far or she will become paralized and die.

please don't attempt to bull shit me.

I own every issue you do and then some.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
really.........yet she almost became paralized doiing stuff thor could do well sleeping.............

which was stated that she can no longer push her self to far or she will become paralized and die.

please don't attempt to bull shit me.

I own every issue you do and then some.

Technically he already admitted to not knowing the context around half the things he talks about. So I'm not sure if he owns any issues... for all we know this troll might actually hate storm and is working hard to get others to hate her as well.

also unlike thor she can lose control of the weather.................thor does not have tha problem.'

man the BS I have seen you throw out there is beyond me. I am surpized people have not shoved all of it down your thoat.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Technically he already admitted to not knowing the context around half the things he talks about. So I'm not sure if he owns any issues... for all we know this troll might actually hate storm and is working hard to get others to hate her as well.

oh that would explain a lot

also 2 whatever your name is. start putting down issue numebrs and titles with your posts so I can look all this up and debunk your statments

Originally posted by 2damnloud
I noticed noticed you use vague language like:

If you set up the perfect conditions for something to occur and/or coax it along

Explain with a canonical example and corresponding, corroborating scientific evidence.

Im putting your ass on the GRILL😈


It was vague because it can be applied to a lot of things. Example: You're camping and you need a fire. Brush fires naturally occur but that's hardly timely. You can use a magnifying glass or flint to get a little something going but it may take a while before you get something workable. Set up the conditions for the fire, like a tinder bundle or... a rag soaked in lighter fluid, that's going aflame. The fire will catch faster.

Heck, that's part of why brush fires start in the first place, "good" conditions.

Another example, a plant may not grow in some conditions but manage to survive in others. In the perfect conditions for that plant will grow much faster and be more more hearty.

This stuff is common knowledge so I doubt I'll need to get scientific evidence.

Does anyone have scans of fire catching on a flammable substance or a plant growing better in prime conditions? I'm not sure how this all holds up in Marvel.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Yea, she's always taken control of Herald and elemental persons 🙄

A being of undefined energy who wasn't paying attention and a dumdum Spider-man villain.

Stardust, being a herald of formidable power, as seen in his previous battles, would of at least struggled if he was on guard. Even if Storm had superior control, there would of been that.

And hydroman is an idiot. It was that same hydroman wasn't it? The spider-man one? Yeah, he's a dolt. I'd put it along the same lines as any other water manipulating feat Storm has.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Waiting on your expert analysis, Swank.🙂

*blank stare*
My condition has not been met. Look back and find it.

Let me be clear, you all are wasting your posts on a person who can't see beyond fanboyism, is a common troll or a person with a chip on their shoulder over a comic book character. Three out out of four mods have already called this person out and yet here we are with the same ridiculous debate. It's beyond pathetic that all of KMC agrees, sans two or three people, the outcome. Do everybody a favor and don't waste your posts on people who talk in circles, use veiled insults and change the topic every time they are proved wrong.

I am really sick of 2 whatever that person name is. I might jsut spend all my time debunking all he/ or she says.

Originally posted by Badabing
Let me be clear, you all are wasting your posts on a person who can't see beyond fanboyism, is a common troll or a person with a chip on their shoulder over a comic book character. Three out out of four mods have already called this person out and yet here we are with the same ridiculous debate. It's beyond pathetic that all of KMC agrees, sans two or three people, the outcome. Do everybody a favor and don't waste your posts on people who talk in circles, use veiled insults and change the topic every time they are proved wrong.

we can't help it

he or she like another masterbruce or tonystark. i refuse to let there crap stand

Does anyone have the Thor quote from IIRC Captain Marvel 17, it was something about how Thor has control(or can call on) the power of every storm/weather condition on Earth at anytime he wants.

I can't seem find my issue.

Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
It was vague because it can be applied to a lot of things. Example: You're camping and you need a fire. Brush fires naturally occur but that's hardly timely. You can use a magnifying glass or flint to get a little something going but it may take a while before you get something workable. Set up the conditions for the fire, like a tinder bundle or... a rag soaked in lighter fluid, that's going aflame. The fire will catch faster.

Heck, that's part of why brush fires start in the first place, "good" conditions.

Another example, a plant may not grow in some conditions but manage to survive in others. In the perfect conditions for that plant will grow much faster and be more more hearty.

This stuff is common knowledge so I doubt I'll need to get scientific evidence.

Does anyone have scans of fire catching on a flammable substance or a plant growing better in prime conditions? I'm not sure how this all holds up in Marvel.

DUH!

Everyone knows this.

But in the context of Storm's powers I want you to:

Explain with a canonical example and corresponding, corroborating scientific evidence.

A being of undefined energy who wasn't paying attention and a dumdum Spider-man villain.

Stardust, being a herald of formidable power, as seen in his previous battles, would of at least struggled if he was on guard. Even if Storm had superior control, there would of been that.

And hydroman is an idiot. It was that same hydroman wasn't it? The spider-man one? Yeah, he's a dolt. I'd put it along the same lines as any other water manipulating feat Storm has.

Wow, a being of "undefined energy".

Thanx for supporting my analysis of "no clear perameters". I guess you were trying to find a way around Stardust being like a "star" which would make me correct in my assertion that she can manipulate them(stars).

Still, none of this is cogent to the point that she did what she hasn't done before.

1.She needed Hydrogen atoms to create the lightning in an earlier issue.

2.She needed none in the next issue.

3.She showed direct control of water by controling the phases of matter(liquid to gas)

All points that were argued on the McDuffie board.

All things we have never seen her do.

I could've SWORN in the Iceman vs Storm thread I said she could do the SAME thing to Iceman that she did to Hydroman.

People laughed and called me a retard, though 😂

so your jsut gunna keep ignoring the fact storm can't over extend her self or she dies..........

Originally posted by 2damnloud
DUH!

Everyone knows this.

But in the context of Storm's powers I want you to:

Explain with a canonical example and corresponding, corroborating scientific evidence.

Wow, a being of "undefined energy".

Thanx for supporting my analysis of "no clear perameters". I guess you were trying to find a way around Stardust being like a "star" which would make me correct in my assertion that she can manipulate them(stars).

Still, none of this is cogent to the point that she did what she hasn't done before.

1.She needed Hydrogen atoms to create the lightning in an earlier issue.

2.She needed none in the next issue.

3.She showed direct control of water by controling the phases of matter(liquid to gas)

All points that were argued on the McDuffie board.

All things we have never seen her do.

I could've SWORN in the Iceman vs Storm thread I said she could do the SAME thing to Iceman that she did to Hydroman.

People laughed and called me a retard, though 😂

if the shoe fits...

And yes, I will read your analysis.🙄

If the above "fire" analogy is any indication then......

Originally posted by Creshosk
if the shoe fits...

This wasn't nice.

We must work within the rules of the KMC forum not run roughshod over them.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
so your jsut gunna keep ignoring the fact storm can't over extend her self or she dies..........
of course, he's also going to ignore the events of the comics, logic and reasoning.

They get in the way of him tarnishing storm's character.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
This wasn't nice.

We must work within the rules of the KMC forum not run roughshod over them.

Oh I'm sorry, were you offended by that remark?

Do you want to be the pot or the kettle this time?