so let me get this straight...Trains are worse than pushing planets? even though pushing planets is just a cartoonie feat...never intending to be realistic...heck for all we know in DC comic logic planets have no gravity inside space or rotate...theres only thin crust on the surfer...superman's space feats aren't truelly made to make sense or earth villians would be useless...Trains however are definite,better imagined,and can be used at multiple points in superman's career...same with buildings or mountains...it truelly is the small things that may be good to use as records because we understand them...space however no matter who gets thrown in it in the fictional universe is bound to be ridiculous...trust me on that one...
Originally posted by Villelater
so let me get this straight...Trains are worse than pushing planets? even though pushing planets is just a cartoonie feat...never intending to be realistic...heck for all we know in DC comic logic planets have no gravity inside space or rotate...theres only thin crust on the surfer...superman's space feats aren't truelly made to make sense or earth villians would be useless...Trains however are definite,better imagined,and can be used at multiple points in superman's career...same with buildings or mountains...it truelly is the small things that may be good to use as records because we understand them...space however no matter who gets thrown in it in the fictional universe is bound to be ridiculous...trust me on that one...
...No.
Originally posted by Villelater
yes...very ridiculous...all those feats mean nothing really...heck science hadn't evolved enough to understand space at a deep level...old supes space feats=nadda
We know how much mass the Earth has. Science knows enough for feats like moving planets to be quantifiable and to have at least some definitive figures beside them.
Also, Superman before the reboot was catching trains casually.
nope...DC pretty much invented Superman to be amazing in any ridiculous fashion...DC/Warner bros pretty much intended it that way...loony toons,kids,hello? kids don't care what superman does...as long as its cool for them...you guys are forgetting important facts of older-supes...as for trains i said stop not catch...PS Science wasn't intended to be a huge strong-point for DC in the first place...
Originally posted by Villelater
nope...DC pretty much invented Superman to be amazing in any ridiculous fashion...DC/Warner bros pretty much intended it that way...loony toons,kids,hello? kids don't care what superman does...as long as its cool for them...you guys are forgetting important facts of older-supes...as for trains i said stop not catch...PS Science wasn't intended to be a huge strong-point for DC in the first place...
I honestly don't know what you're getting at.
None of what I said is untrue, though.
Maybe P.R.'s mad because trains have been performing BETTER than Superman these past 20 years ... ?
Even Kyle Rayner knew which one is best to bring to a fight ...
😛
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=14122362
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Maybe P.R.'s mad because trains have been performing BETTER than Superman these past 20 years ... ?Even Kyle Rayner knew which one is best to bring to a fight ...
😛
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=14122362
If it was true, maybe.
But then there's this:
Also, Superman is in Rome when he hears the commotion.
but yeah, trains are small fry to Superman.
Originally posted by Villelater
do writers study science? DC's Superman original audiance? ah forget it...im taking a break
What, you want to use scans from pre crisis to support your argument even though they're no longer valid?
