fanboyism vs logic

Started by Illustrious11 pages
Originally posted by TwisterGameX
so it's not pis/cis for goku but when superman gets hurt and almost dies from everything as little as electricty it is right ?

Nobody said to bring your bad logic here.

It's not PIS if it's not an inconsistency. If people cut Superman with a razor, it's an inconsistency, because Superman has broken scissors with his hair before has been attempting to be cut/shot at before with no result, razorblades are known to not work on him.

Nowhere does it state that Goku is immune to being cut by a jagged rock or other lacerations. No inconsistency, no PIS.

Originally posted by Illustrious
Nobody said to bring your bad logic here.

It's not PIS if it's not an inconsistency. If people cut Superman with a razor, it's an inconsistency, because Superman has broken scissors with his hair before has been attempting to be cut/shot at before with no result, razorblades are known to not work on him.

Nowhere does it state that Goku is immune to being cut by a jagged rock or other lacerations. No inconsistency, no PIS.

Freiza blitz goku and continued to go through the earth with gokus body. Also did that rock kill goku ? no so why on earth is it ok for you to assume that it was going to kill him ?

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
Freiza blitz goku and continued to go through the earth with gokus body. Also did that rock kill goku ? no so why on earth is it ok for you to assume that it was going to kill him ?

If it bullet passes through a medium at high enough speed, it won't get bent and distorted. If it goes slower, it would.

You're attempting to apply 3rd grade reasoning to a more advanced topic. Nowhere is it stated that Goku is immune to getting lacerations from earthly objects like Supes is.

Originally posted by Illustrious
If it bullet passes through a medium at high enough speed, it won't get bent and distorted. If it goes slower, it would.

You're attempting to apply 3rd grade reasoning to a more advanced topic. Nowhere is it stated that Goku is immune to getting lacerations from earthly objects like Supes is.

Don't assume now when it helps you after the arguement of the power level rating and what they said they could destroy. of course you only use things when it helps you. Then go with the oh third grade disrespecting.

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
Don't assume now when it helps you after the arguement of the power level rating and what they said they could destroy. of course you only use things when it helps you. Then go with the oh third grade disrespecting.

Funny you say I disrespect when you do it just as much as me, if not more so.

When did I not assume when it came to power levels?

I always say "give me proof." When you told me Cell said he could destroy a solar system, you have to show me when he exhibited something of that level. He has not, no proof.

Just like this, there is no proof of Goku being immune to being lacerated. This isn't "he didn't get cut that one time, therefore he is immune." This is, can early objects such as a jagged rock cut him. It can, and it's not unfeasible given Goku's outlined abilities, so it's not PIS.

For example, it is PIS if Superman gets a papercut, because it has been outlined that he can not/should not have that happen, etc.

Using kryptonite is a plot device. Saying he was hit by a "slow" enemy is using PIS to make your case. And what makes you believe people like Doomsday or Darkseid are slow in the first place?

Face it, you have nothing to stand on. You jump into this thread when it turns to Goku losing and you hound it until no end.

If not more ? thats funny since you started it. You seem to take evrything to seriously to and get to tense.

I didn't disrespect you. I disrespected your applied logic.

Basic physics tells you an object that passes fast enough doesn't get deformed from impact because the impact doesn't occur for long enough or the acceleration is too large.

And I'm perfectly calm, it's rather funny how you suddenly go back to thinkly veiled insults like "If not more ? thats funny since you started it. You seem to take evrything to seriously to and get to tense" whenever you start losing an argument.

Originally posted by Illustrious
I didn't disrespect you. I disrespected your applied logic.

Basic physics tells you an object that passes fast enough doesn't get deformed from impact because the impact doesn't occur for long enough or the acceleration is too large.

And I'm perfectly calm, it's rather funny how you suddenly go back to thinkly veiled insults like "[b]If not more ? thats funny since you started it. You seem to take evrything to seriously to and get to tense" whenever you start losing an argument. [/B]

No you make it seem that i am an idiot and what ever I say is crap, in the goku vs superman which i don't like, and then i think it was deux posting these "Pics" and of course you agreed. Other than that i really don't have a problem with you. well i will argue for what ever character you like better to stay on your good side. 💃

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Pardon me if I didn't know this deus, but I saw your name when I was reading the reviews by xplay, and I realize you delve into games alot.

Are you one of their staff?

Where's this now?

I'm sorry, but I really must ask....

What does DBZ have to do with the topic?

😛

I guess we know what's really on these guys' minds.

Just wondering if this thread still has any purpose, is all.

Aparently, logic is less purposefull than DBZ to them.

They know DBZ.

They don't know logic.

😂

Weeeeell....try and keep the thread on the original topic or I'll be forced to close it, guys 🙂

"Fanboys are the....KAMEHAMEHA!"

The original topic was that DBZ fanboys lose their asses to logic every time and refuse to admit it.

But yeah. You have modly powers, lana?

Ah, okay.

And yes I do 😊

*Shifts eyes*

I didn't do nothin'. Honest!

Originally posted by Deus Ex
Where's this now?
Oh I just saw a bunch of reviews by "deus x" (In an xplay booklet), and I noticed you had extensive knowledge in the aspects of gaming.

Am I on the money?

Nah, not me.