Originally posted by iluvsirius
if you still see Harry Potter as a childs book well then weve got serious problems...it stopped being a childs book since i think book 4...and if he took out the dark lord when he went to invite him to hogwarts well it would be REALLY WEIRD that he just killed a kid in an orphanage! things have to pass for destiny to be fulfilled it could be tampered with but not extremely changed cause then history will change...
yes it is a childs book. jk wrote them to be a childs books.
also it wouldent be weerd if you took him out as a child, hello if you could go back and kill/capture one person in order to save countless friends, and family members.. you would do it would you not??? you would not nessesaraly have to kill the kid ether.. you could capture him... or there are even other possibilities.,.. the point is if DD was Ron but older, DD would know what the dark lord was up to... DD would have know when rons dad got hurt in the ministry in the 5th book... he would have know harrys name was going to come out of the goblet... he would have ben able to save harry... i think its just a vary smart wizard.. who knows what he is doing. And also he would have know what happend when the girl got cursed in the 6th book... and he would have know where the troll was in the 1st book... think about it.