Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No sir. Just peruse the link that I provided, it should serve to elucidate my position more thoroughly.But what do you base your moral understanding about homosexuality being "good" on? How did you arrive at this conclusion?
I do not subscribe to the belief that homosexuality is good. But I live by a different standard than you, an absolute standard that is independent of what I think. Simply put I have "voluntarily" submitted "my will" and my concept of morality and ethics to a "higher will", a will not at the mercy of human caprice and vacillation. This higher will never changes with the times or the trends, but remains independent of them and constant. Furthermore, I live my life within a set of boundaries not "all" set by me (some I set for myself and others were prescribed by Someone else).
No thank you, I prefer to look at actual science and draw my conclusions from their, I dislike biased sites.
From a very basic human believe that what does not harm another human is not to be considered bad. Homosexuality as such is not good or bad. Just like being blond is not good or bad. No one is harmed by homosexuals so they have every right to live just like heterosexuals.
But it is an assumed absolute. You have no clue if it actually exists. What you can be sure of is that it is morals that other people 2000 years ago wrote down. You don't know if they are backed by something absolute and looking at it objectively it is very unlikely. Not impossible, but unlikely. In either way you choose all your morals yourself. Some just happen to have been based on a book you think is absolute.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I am not sure what exactly you are referring to, but when you mean my argument with debbiejo..well..still not everything is made out of Energy..
You don't have to prove anything to him...there is very little he knows. He also has a hard time thinking for himself, and he doesn't even know enough about his OWN religion, so how would you expect him to know jack sh*t about ne thing else ?
Originally posted by Lord Urizen
You don't have to prove anything to him...there is very little he knows. He also has a hard time thinking for himself, and he doesn't even know enough about his [b]OWN religion, so how would you expect him to know jack sh*t about ne thing else ? [/B]
Have I stated my religion here, I think not. Actually you are the one debating religion I am just saying your debate is asstastic.
Originally posted by Lord Urizen
You don't have to prove anything to him...there is very little he knows. He also has a hard time thinking for himself, and he doesn't even know enough about his [b]OWN religion, so how would you expect him to know jack sh*t about ne thing else ? [/B]
Originally posted by Bardock42
No thank you, I prefer to look at actual science and draw my conclusions from their, I dislike biased sites.From a very basic human believe that what does not harm another human is not to be considered bad. Homosexuality as such is not good or bad. Just like being blond is not good or bad. No one is harmed by homosexuals so they have every right to live just like heterosexuals.
But it is an assumed absolute. You have no clue if it actually exists. What you can be sure of is that it is morals that other people 2000 years ago wrote down. You don't know if they are backed by something absolute and looking at it objectively it is very unlikely. Not impossible, but unlikely. In either way you choose all your morals yourself. Some just happen to have been based on a book you think is absolute.
I knew that you would shrink from the Truth.