Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
I disargee with it myself.No name calling it is just how I feel on the subject.Anyway the church does not like it because it is not nature and it is a sin to have that sort of feeling for someone of your own sex.jm 🙂
btw...if its not natural, how do you explain homosexuality being observed across the animal kingdom?
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
I disargee with it myself.No name calling it is just how I feel on the subject.Anyway the church does not like it because it is not nature and it is a sin to have that sort of feeling for someone of your own sex.jm 🙂
[QUOTE=7439486]Originally posted by Storm
Humans are obviously a part of nature, so if humans have homosexual relationships, is that not therefore a part of nature? Homosexual activity and homosexual relationships can be found throughout nature. [/QUOT
It is just a wrong part of nature no matter how you look at it they should all just die off anyway because thats how it will be if they keep it up. JM
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
It is just a wrong part of nature no matter how you look at it they should all just die off anyway because thats how it will be if they keep it up. JM
Why do you decide what is a wrong and what a right part of nature? `
Also, they kept it up for many thousands of years now and it did not die out, how do you explain that?
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
It is just a wrong part of nature no matter how you look at it they should all just die off anyway because thats how it will be if they keep it up. JM
Originally posted by Alliance
btw...if its not natural, how do you explain homosexuality being observed across the animal kingdom?
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
[QUOTE=7439486]Originally posted by Storm
[B]
It is just a wrong part of nature no matter how you look at it they should all just die off anyway because thats how it will be if they keep it up. JM
Go ahead and tell that to a gay person. go on, try it. the opposite may happen.
hate speech is incitement to violence and panic. It's not protected by the first ammendment. Do what you will but if you must physically rearrange a bigot, don't feel bad about it.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Why do you decide what is a wrong and what a right part of nature? `Also, they kept it up for many thousands of years now and it did not die out, how do you explain that?
Why do people try and equate what goes on in the animal kingdom with humanity? Human beings are not animals and animals are not human beings.
"In conclusion, it seems likely that "in the image of God" refers to the characteristics of the human spirit and the ability to make moral judgments - things that are not found in any animal species, even those to whom we are said to be closely related. Even evolutionists are beginning to recognize the uniqueness of human beings. Dr. Ian Tattersall, in Becoming Human - Evolution and Human Uniqueness, says humans represent a "totally unprecedented entity" on Earth, and "Homo sapiens is not simply an improved version of its ancestors - it's a new concept." It is the ability to make moral judgments that convinces us of our inability to "measure up" to the intended moral standards laid down by God.21 However, it is the spirit of man that allows us to communicate with God's Spirit through Jesus Christ22 so that we can once again be in fellowship with a Holy God23 and experience the ultimate relationship in the universe."
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why do people try and equate what goes on in the animal kingdom with humanity? Human beings are not animals and animals are not human beings."In conclusion, it seems likely that "in the image of God" refers to the characteristics of the human spirit and [B]the ability to make moral judgments - things that are not found in any animal species, even those to whom we are said to be closely related. Even evolutionists are beginning to recognize the uniqueness of human beings. Dr. Ian Tattersall, in Becoming Human - Evolution and Human Uniqueness, says humans represent a "totally unprecedented entity" on Earth, and "Homo sapiens is not simply an improved version of its ancestors - it's a new concept."
It is the ability to make moral judgments that convinces us of our inability to "measure up" to the intended moral standards laid down by God.21 However, it is the spirit of man that allows us to communicate with God's Spirit through Jesus Christ22 so that we can once again be in fellowship with a Holy God23 and experience the ultimate relationship in the universe."
Because humans still do have very clear animal instincts and similarities. In everything we do we can see it. Since I am a human as well I must be in the spirit of God too. So my moral undersanding that Homosexuality is good is just as valid as yours, don't you think?
Originally posted by Darth Jello
i wonder if this is what she meant
I'm sure many religious nuts wouldn't be opposed to that... But what they fail to realize in their infinite divine inspired wisdom, gay couples do not make gay babies, so killing every single homosexual on the planet will accomplish nothing.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Because humans still do have very clear animal instincts and similarities. In everything we do we can see it. Since I am a human as well I must be in the spirit of God too. So my moral undersanding that Homosexuality is good is just as valid as yours, don't you think?
No sir. Just peruse the link that I provided, it should serve to elucidate my position more thoroughly.
But what do you base your moral understanding about homosexuality being "good" on? How did you arrive at this conclusion?
I do not subscribe to the belief that homosexuality is good. But I live by a different standard than you, an absolute standard that is independent of what I think. Simply put I have "voluntarily" submitted "my will" and my concept of morality and ethics to a "higher will", a will not at the mercy of human caprice and vacillation. This higher will never changes with the times or the trends, but remains independent of them and constant. Furthermore, I live my life within a set of boundaries not "all" set by me (some I set for myself and others were prescribed by Someone else).
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi It is just a wrong part of nature no matter how you look at it they should all just die off anyway because thats how it will be if they keep it up. JM [/B]
1) How do you know its wrong?
2) You don't wondor if it may be a necessary component to nature, as it helps limit the population very well ?
3) Homosexuals will not die off, because there always have been homosexuals, and since homosexuals are born from heterosexual couples, they will most likely always exist. Sorry...
4) You're an idiot....lemme guess, ur 16 right ?