On Homosexuality & Religion [Merged]

Started by Alliance274 pages

No, it doesn't.

Racism would be a notable example.

Howeverm if Christians would like to promote themseves as a religion of only white conservative straight rich people, I totally support that. I can't think of a faster way to loose credibility.

Originally posted by Alliance
No, it doesn't.

Racism would be a notable example.


Except that's not biblically supported.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Except that's not biblically supported.

No kidding. God calls himself God of all nations, Jesus is a covenant for all nations, Gentiles can be saved even under the much maligned OT law. Racism, especially on the behalf of whites, is not Biblically supported.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Oh, well, when we're all one big almagamated New Age religion, the world will be a better place.
Yeah..........HAHAHAHA......Peace and Harmony finally..

😖mart:

Originally posted by Nellinator
Actually it does. Its called the creation account. Adam and Eve sin and death comes into the world. Therefore, the wages of sin is death. .
Yes, I've read that story....and no where does it say spiritual death. Only death of the body.

*Pauline Worshippers are everywhere*
🙄

On Homosexuality and Religion. By Terrorist.

So homosexuality is on top and the religion is on the bottom

lets say that Homosexuality = feceman and Religion = Lord Urizen. 😂

That means that Feceman is on Lord Urizen. Oh what a wonderful world it would be.

Then Politics also want to intervene between Homosexuality and Relgion.

Lets say that Politics = DebbieJo.

Politics on Homosexuality and Religion. that would be a Good Orgy Party. Double penetration double fun.

Originally posted by Terrorist
On Homosexuality and Religion. By Terrorist.

So homosexuality is on top and the religion is on the bottom

lets say that Homosexuality = feceman and Religion = Lord Urizen. 😂

That means that Feceman is on Lord Urizen. Oh what a wonderful world it would be.

Then Politics also want to intervene between Homosexuality and Relgion.

Lets say that Politics = DebbieJo.

Politics on Homosexuality and Religion. that would be a Good Orgy Party. Double penetration double fun.

You at KMC is like a monkey at a pharmacist's (drug store), both would be better without eachother.

Originally posted by Terrorist
On Homosexuality and Religion. By Terrorist.

So homosexuality is on top and the religion is on the bottom

lets say that Homosexuality = feceman and Religion = Lord Urizen. 😂

That means that Feceman is on Lord Urizen. Oh what a wonderful world it would be.

Then Politics also want to intervene between Homosexuality and Relgion.

Lets say that Politics = DebbieJo.

Politics on Homosexuality and Religion. that would be a Good Orgy Party. Double penetration double fun.

hysterical hystericalhystericalhystericalhystericalhysterical

Originally posted by lord xyz
You at KMC is like a monkey at a pharmacist's (drug store), both would be better without eachother.

You on KMC is like having a chaperone at a college party.

You need to lighten the f*ck up ✅ Get laid or something ✅

You frequently complain about others on these forums, about how "inappropriate" or how " pointless" someone's post is, while making little contribution yourself. Get that tree outta your ass and stop being BORING

yawnyawnyawnyawn

Originally posted by Terrorist
On Homosexuality and Religion. By Terrorist.

So homosexuality is on top and the religion is on the bottom

lets say that Homosexuality = feceman and Religion = Lord Urizen. 😂

That means that Feceman is on Lord Urizen. Oh what a wonderful world it would be.

Then Politics also want to intervene between Homosexuality and Relgion.

Lets say that Politics = DebbieJo.

Politics on Homosexuality and Religion. that would be a Good Orgy Party. Double penetration double fun.


The ****?

Anyway, should I be religion, or are we going for no sense being made whatsoever?

Get that tree outta your ass

droolio

Originally posted by FeceMan
The ****?

Anyway, should I be religion, or are we going for no sense being made whatsoever?

He was saying you were on top, and I was on bottom. In homo terms that means you were f*cking me up the ass. I doubt you'd like it to be the other way around.

Originally posted by FeceMan
droolio

Don't get me started ! droolio

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
He was saying you were on top, and I was on bottom. In homo terms that means you were f*cking me up the ass. I doubt you'd like it to be the other way around.

I am well aware of what the terms "top" and "bottom" mean.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I am well aware of what the terms "top" and "bottom" mean.

😱 YOU MUST HAVE EXPERIENCE !

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
😱 YOU MUST HAVE EXPERIENCE !

YAH RLY PENIS IN TEH ASS U NO WHUT I MEAN???

Originally posted by FeceMan
YAH RLY PENIS IN TEH ASS U NO WHUT I MEAN???

droolio droolio droolio droolio droolio

Ah...brings back memories. Thanks 👆

This thread is starting to make me hot. leftright

Doesn't make me hot. It makes me question why some people open their mouths when they do more harm to the cause the proclaim v. the cause they condemn. Don't be so cliche.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Because you got extremely personal about it in a way that was clearly way over the top.

what I can't see is a fifteen year old having parents old enough to have been born from parents that died in gas chambers in the 40's! That means her "parents" were born pre 45...which would make them at least 61 when they gave birth to "her".

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
what I can't see is a fifteen year old having parents old enough to have been born from parents that died in gas chambers in the 40's! That means her "parents" were born pre 45...which would make them at least 61 when they gave birth to "her".

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[QUOTE=7748485]Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
Germans killed my grandfather.I hate hitler saying that i am a nazis is an insult to me and him.jm

Your parents are either too young to be Holocaust survivors, or too old to have had you. Vanish sock. [/QUOTE]

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
what I can't see is a fifteen year old having parents old enough to have been born from parents that died in gas chambers in the 40's! That means her "parents" were born pre 45...which would make them at least 61 when they gave birth to "her".

Seriously, don't keep discussing this. Like I said, keep any comments about it in private. Keep things on topic.