On Homosexuality & Religion [Merged]

Started by Shakyamunison274 pages

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Thank You Shaky....you are the fkn man !

But despite your information, we are still gonna have some debators that will argue. "But its still a SIN ! And animals are not people, people can't SIN!"

And then you are gonna have total IDIOTS who are gonna say, "Being Gay is a mental illness and is an choice and makes me wanto vomit and it iz disgusting bacouse it is a SIN"

I'm glad you liked it, but just remember those who are most sickened by what others do, are that way because they see in themselves what they think are flaws in other people.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I'm glad you liked it, but just remember those who are most sickened by what others do, are that way because they see in themselves what they think are flaws in other people.

I know. It took me a long time to realize that. I used to judge, critisize, and bully people all the time years and years ago.

It took me a while to realize that I was only doing that out of insecurity with myself. Once I matured and learned to love myself, I learned to love everyone else as well. 🙂

Who decides what is sin and what is not sin other than God alone?

How do we know what God's rules are? The Bible and the bible speaks strongly against Homosexuality, bear in mind the Bible speaks equally strong against stealing a chocolate bar.
For the wages of sin is death. But the gift of god is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord Romans 6:23

Originally posted by LFBC_Gir
Who decides what is sin and what is not sin other than God alone?

Human Beings. Human Beings WROTE the Bible, as you yourself admitted in the other thread.

Human Beings in power have been setting the threshold of morality for millenia. People themselves have been deciding what is "right or wrong" for ages. The Bible is nothing special in this case.

Originally posted by LFBC_Gir
How do we know what God's rules are? The Bible and the bible speaks strongly against Homosexuality, bear in mind the Bible speaks equally strong against stealing a chocolate bar.

The Bible is just a book written by man, and bears no factual relevance, not to mention it not only contradicts ITSELF but also contradicts scientific fact and modern logic.

Originally posted by LFBC_Gir
For the wages of sin is death. But the gift of god is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord Romans 6:23

The wages of sin is HELL to be more specific. Death happens to all of us, Christian or not, so that's a false claim.

Yes men did write the Bible and they did it with the power of the Holy Spirit. Which is God, so essentially God wrote the Bible.

Contradicts itself?

Originally posted by LFBC_Gir
Yes men did write the Bible and they did it with the power of the Holy Spirit. Which is God, so essentially God wrote the Bible.

A claim I have heard many a time before. Can you somehow prove that God wrote the Bible?

Or must I blindly accept that assertion ?

Originally posted by LFBC_Gir
Contradicts itself?

Yes, it does. I've had these discussions before, there are threads based on this.

You pretty much have to blindly accept this "assertion"

God works off faith, not by proof.

Matthew 16:4 (Jesus Speaking)
"A wicked and adulterous generation looks for a miraculous sign, but none will be given it except the sign of Jonah." Jesus then left them and went away.

The sign of Jonah." is?

Jonah is a story of a man who disobeyed God and God had him thrown out of a boat and he was eaten by a fish.
How Long was he in the Fish?
Three days
How long was Jesus dead for?
Three days

The wages of sin are death--a physical death and a spirital death.

Not says so in the bible...........Oh, you must be a Paul fan, cause Jesus never said it.

Paul worshipper

Originally posted by debbiejo
Not says so in the bible...........Oh, you must be a Paul fan, cause Jesus never said it.

Paul worshipper


Paulianity, amirite.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Not says so in the bible...........Oh, you must be a Paul fan, cause Jesus never said it.

Paul worshipper


Actually it does. Its called the creation account. Adam and Eve sin and death comes into the world. Therefore, the wages of sin is death. Paul was a master theologian even if he was a man. When what he says disagrees with the word of God or Jesus then we throw it out. Until then we see his wisdom which was given to him by God and acknowledged by Peter. You used to contribute, now you just mumble about vague things, no facts, no details. Nothing.
Originally posted by FeceMan
Paulianity, amirite.

😂 The way I imagine you saying amirite makes me laugh.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
And a note on this thread as a whole -

It is stupid and naive to believe that if there were no religious people, it would be heaven for gays. It would not.

The matter of the fact is that there are non-religious homophobic people, and to even claim that only religious people are homophobic is baseless and false.

Sure religion has influence, but it is not ''the enemy''. Socially acceptable and non-acceptable things are, as far as west goes, less and less associated with religion, and far more with social structure.

Thus, get a grip. Religious is not going to save homosexuals, or be the end of the homosexuals. Religious view on homosexuals is marely one in the stream of things which are imbeded in our socio-cultural structure.

True to a degree, but the origin of much of the current anti-homosexual opinion can often be traced to religious sources - primarily Christian or Islamic. It is true that even without religion homosexuals would likely find bias from sections of society, but I strongly suspect the power of the anti-homosexual lobby would be vastly diminished if religion started supporting it.

It is hardly a coincidence that even on these forums the majority of those who have expressed anti-homosexual opinions usually list the Bible as one of the sources for their world view on the subject. In fact I can remember virtually no member who, when asked to justify their stance, hasn't listed their religion as part of their argument - the classic "it is a sin."

It is also worth noting that past societies religions were far more accepting of homosexuality, and even had mythological figures who had homosexual or bisexual tendencies. Religion is most certainly not the only source of homosexual bias, however it remain one of the most potent ones. Moves by members of Christian factions are highly promising. Almost every large mainstream Christian group has a section of priests and laymen advocating the rescinding of the whole "homosexuality is a sin" concept, and it is a growing movement. If and when it succeeds it will be interesting to see how the vocal anti-homosexual people respond. For those who use religion as the basis of their arguments. Will they suddenly be able to accept homosexuality because it is no longer a sin? Probably not, since it is a personal thing. Religion can merely offer them a way to legitimize their arguments.

It's too bad that a large percentage of those attempts at "rescinding the concept" are completely not aligned with biblical teachings.

Oh, well, when we're all one big almagamated New Age religion, the world will be a better place.

Originally posted by FeceMan
It's too bad that a large percentage of those attempts at "rescinding the concept" are completely not aligned with biblical teachings.

Oh, well, when we're all one big almagamated New Age religion, the world will be a better place.

Well you yourself see that the claim "homosexuality is wrong because God destroyed Sodom to punish homosexuals" is erronious, and that is a start.

I see no problem with them rescinding it. In fact I dare say it would be good for the Church's image if it didn't discriminate against a reasonably numberable section of society.

The church has always discrimintated and ever since the dawn of the concept of equal rights, we seemingly have to beat the church into being a sane institution.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
I see no problem with them rescinding it.

Of course you don't--you're not a believer.

My problem is not with them rescinding it but the belief that fuels their actions.

If they'd look at history, they'd find many things that they now find acceptable that were spoken out against by Christians using the Bible as a base for their argument.

Originally posted by Alliance
If they'd look at history, they'd find many things that they now find acceptable that were spoken out against by Christians using the Bible as a base for their argument.

That simply reinforces the idea that we've become a moral trainwreck, so no-go.