On Homosexuality & Religion [Merged]

Started by Alliance274 pages
Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Listen, I like Nellinator though. He is a lot more rational than many Christians on these forums. But he still does not recognize his biases. He still sees the Bible as absolute, undeniable truth. He has a sentimental attachment to it, which does not allow him to wondor off into other realms of possibility.

Well you slam Regret a lot, and he is not that different.

Nellinator has issues on some issues. The infalibility issue is a big one. And he has a shifting argument problem. And yes he can be polite and that is always welcome.

However I much prefer to debate rather than kiss peoples arses.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Once he realizes that the Bible, that Christianity, like all religions, is just a human beleif system, he will be free from those mental confinements.
Hopefully.

Originally posted by Alliance
However I much prefer to debate rather than kiss peoples arses.
I don't remember bending over and laying a sloppy one on your poopshoot, but maybe I have...

I never said you did I was referring to Urizen and my tangent about how much we liked you.

But you always can if thats what makes you happy 😂

Originally posted by Alliance
I never said you did I was referring to Urizen and my tangent about how much we liked you.

But you always can if thats what makes you happy 😂


What are you talking about?

How much you love my

Originally posted by Nellinator
poopshoot.

Err its poopshoot.

😂 Ok enough editting wars.

Originally posted by Nellinator
What are you talking about?

😂

If you don't want wars, don't start them 🙂

Ok.

Originally posted by Nellinator
🥷

You are not allowed to take my smiley.

What are you talking about?
This is gonna be confusing for people reading this.

Originally posted by Nellinator
What are you talking about?
This is gonna be confusing for people reading this.

Good. I like it when people get horny. I mean, there really is hope for the world if you and I can have sexual relations.

...

Now I see why you are so impressionable.

And why is that?

O

?

Exactly. Who the hell writes:

Originally posted by Nellinator
O
as a response.

Whats wrong with it? Would you have preferred 'Oh'?