BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube
Originally posted by dirkdirden
Well if you word it that way you also shouldn't compare the PS3 with the xbox360 because they are trying to do completely different things as well.The xbox focusing on FPS and online play while the PS3 is focusing on Making an all purpose media center with an array of games from FPS to RPG.
also the Wii is 250 and xbox is 300. and the Xbox will be dropping in price in about a year or so making the bottom line xbox cheaper than the wii.
They maybe aiming differently but they are both aiming at the same market.
No, that's very very incorrect on all accounts.
The PS3 and 360 ARE focused on much of the same, they're going head to head over the same demographics. Just because they aren't totally identical in every possible way doesn't mean they're totally different, just silly nonsense, right there.
And how do you know Xbox will be dropping in price? Just pulled that out of your ass, did you? Even if it does, that's the low end xbox that is missing tons of things that you need, where as the Wii, for 250 dollars comes with everything you need, including a game. The Wii will still be a better deal, seeing as you will be able to just get it, and play it immediately right out of the box without having to worry about buying a harddrive or online service or even a game.
The Wii isn't aiming at the same market, they're going after a completely NEW market, that's their entire effort, they're trying to get people who aren't gamers into gaming, where as the PS3 and the 360 are both going after people who are already into games, in fact, they're both going after a very specific crowd, the 17-35 aged male demographic. The Wii is going after parents, younger kids, females even grandparents.
So no, it's much more reasonable to compare the PS3 and the 360 then it is the Wii to the 360 and the PS3, seeing as the Wii has almost nothing in common with either of those systems besides its ability to play games.