Originally posted by General Kaliero
Your post really goes a long way toward showing what the PS2 did right, and how the PS3 is the exact opposite.Sony stuck a useless motion control feature in the SixAxis, and filled the PS3 with enough add-ons to call it a "media center" instead of a game console. Now they're pushing for a new motion controller. "Fancy motion controllers or useless add-ons."
"High quality build." I honestly cannot attest to the PS3's physical integrity, but I've already pointed out the quality failure in the Cell processor's architecture.
"Simplicity." With its myriad additional features and, again, the frustrating build of the hardware, the PS3 is anything but simple.
"Vast number of outstanding games." The PS3 lost the majority of its lucrative exclusives, which are now either cross-console or have jumped to other consoles exclusively. The number of games the PS3 has going for it alone is a mere handful.
By 'fancy motion controllers and useless add-ons', I was referring to the Wii.
http://www.gamepro.com/article/features/208300/the-8-dumbest-wii-add-ons/
There's even a Wii-Fit board, zapper, and classic controller. LULZ!
I mean, how many add-ons will they come up just to rip off they're customers.
I find it surprising that people actually spend their money in buying these useless stuff.
Gamers don't really need useless add-ons that nothing to the gameplay.
This is where the PS3/PS2's simplicity comes to play. All you need is a controller, none of those useless crap.
I was talking about the PS2's build quality, simplicity and library of games, NOT the PS3's lol