The 2,000,000th post game

Started by Rogue Jedi52,234 pages

Nivek

Originally posted by Slay
You're actually proving you know shit about football because Cruyff was known for being able to play most roles on the midfield or as an attacker. He was never even considered a midfielder, but an attacker.

Your point? Marek Jankulovski can play as a right back, centre back, right midfielder, defensive midfielder, right wing back, offensive midfielder and striker. He's probably the most versatile player in the world right now, yet he's not considered to being even near the best player in the world.

he was attacking midfield

maybe he just sucks awehawe

face it, holland will never give birth to a player as good as maradonna, pele, charles, best

****ing holland

farmfoods have adverts!?

Originally posted by Mairuzu
I'm almost out of the best stuff I've ever had 🙁

Savor the moment!

Originally posted by ~Wålshy~
he was attacking midfield

maybe he just sucks awehawe

face it, holland will never give birth to a player as good as maradonna, pele, charles, best

I know shit about soccer, but since when does where one is born/raised/taught to play have to do with how good they are?

I think Soccer is kind of lame, unless it's chicks playing.

i wonder how tired im going to be when it comes time for movienight

Originally posted by ~Wålshy~
he was attacking midfield

maybe he just sucks awehawe

face it, holland will never give birth to a player as good as maradonna, pele, charles, best


Haha. You're going to tell me what kind of player Cruijff was now? Ha ****ing ha.

Well obviously, using your logic, he doesn't. Actually, (going by your logic) he is the best player of all time.

Holland gave birth to two or three players who were better than Best and Charles (Cruijff, Van Basten and Bergkamp). One player who is arguably better than Pelé (Cruijff). Maradonna is the best of all time, with Cruyff coming in second.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I know shit about soccer, but since when does where one is born/raised/taught to play have to do with how good they are?
it doesnt

slay just want holland to be nuber 1 awehawe

Dumb Dumb Dumber then the Dirt Dirt Dirt on the ground.

Originally posted by ~Wålshy~
it doesnt

slay just want holland to be nuber 1 awehawe


Ridiculous. Who is the one saying a sub par player is the best player of all time based solely on the fact that he's Welsh? Oh and because he's an attacker, but he can defend. Didier ****ing Drogba can do that, ffs.

Originally posted by ~Wålshy~
it doesnt

slay just want holland to be nuber 1 awehawe

Why cant Holland be number one?

"SHUT UP, IT MAKES SENSE!"

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Why cant Holland be number one?

Because they are in the way of AMERICA!

U.S.A!
U.S.A!

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Why cant Holland be number one?

Because we have never been world champions.

Although, Argentina ADMITTEDLY stole it from us in '78 through extortion, bribery, threats etc.

hi

Originally posted by Slay
Haha. You're going to tell me what kind of player Cruijff was now? Ha ****ing ha.

Well obviously, using your logic, he doesn't. Actually, (going by your logic) he is the best player of all time.

Holland gave birth to two or three players who were better than Best and Charles (Cruijff, Van Basten and Bergkamp). One player who is arguably better than Pelé (Cruijff). Maradonna is the best of all time, with Cruyff coming in second.

he definitely wasn't just a forward!

no, i said about charles being versatile was something cruyff didnt have

but thats just one reason why charles is better

but theres way more stoned

van basten was a great defender

cruyff as good as pele? dont even say that

pele was a god!

or he is god