Why is rape wrong?

well actually, a.) where did it specify what the thread was about? huh? oh that 's right it didn't until it developed...so making things up as you go. i see it as a broad topic that has many angles. b.) if i cared about making a fool of myself, why do you think i'm still posting here?

Originally posted by Saratn
well actually, a.) where did it specify what the thread was about? huh? oh that 's right it didn't until it developed...so making things up as you go. i see it as a broad topic that has many angles. b.) if i cared about making a fool of myself, why do you think i'm still posting here?

If you bothered to read the thread, you'd see that VVD started it with a specific purpose, and that the title was just representative of the real topic. Nowhere is anyone 'making it up as they go'.

Originally posted by Saratn
well, i'm going by what the question was asked in the title. the question that was just recently asked, i had answered. if you don't like it...tough.

So do you often invest yourself in conversations or debates when you don't know what people are talking about? Interesting communications skills you possess there.

As for your response to Lana, "if you don't like it...tough." Perhaps you are more versed in the following techniques of debate:

.... I'm rubber you're glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.

yea, how many post was that later? certainly not on the first page.

Originally posted by Saratn
if i cared about making a fool of myself, why do you think i'm still posting here?

A sucker for punishment?

Originally posted by Saratn
yea, how many post was that later? certainly not on the first page.

Actually, it was. You must have not read down more than a quarter of the page if you missed it.

umm...nothing really all i saw was seeing if people got what he/she was saying or what not.

*smacks forehead*

Good lord, do you need everything spelled out for you?

Middle of the first page. Backfire posted it. Go read it, and then you can actually contribute to the thread.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Presumably if He did, the new ones would then be correct?

ok, what do you mean by "rape"? what do you mean by "wrong?" what do you mean by" ethics" what the hell is that supposed to mean really?

Originally posted by Saratn
what do you mean by "wrong?" what do you mean by" ethics" what the hell is that supposed to mean really?

Well damn, you've stumbled across what this thread is really about!

What makes something wrong?

Originally posted by FeceMan
Yes...they would, I must reluctantly admit.

The problem with that route- as regards this thread- is that it could be argued that there's no reason why He should change them, and that what has been designated is so for a reason.

As a result it doesn't really illuminate the secular debate.

and then that should be the title of the thread.

Or maybe people should actually use those organs that live in their skulls.

You know, your brain. Give it a little exercise and actually think a bit.

well, maybe it shouldn't have been called Is Rape Wrong? because generally people go by what a thread is called.

And sometimes people should bother to actually read more than the title.

Originally posted by Saratn
well, maybe it shouldn't have been called Is Rape Wrong? because generally people go by what a thread is called.

That's why tabloids are so successful.

a.) i did, and really it talked about rape for a bit.
b.)tabloids?

I think it's been quite proven elsewhere that you're not exactly a sponge when it comes to absorbing relevent info or explanations, Saratn.

Everyone, now, understands the thread. If you don't, leave.

-AC

Originally posted by Saratn
a.) i did, and really it talked about rape for a bit.
b.)tabloids?

Rape is simply an example used for the thread purpose.

And once again you completely missed the point of a post.