Why is rape wrong?

Started by Saratn14 pages

yea, and i responded to the example. and AC, this really doesn't have to do with you. Lana was kind enough to explain the thread for me, and i appreciate that a lot.

It took two pages. I interjected for the sake of the thread because I seriously doubt two is enough, given my previous experience in threads with you.

You now understand, things can move on can't they?

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It took two pages. I interjected for the sake of the thread because I seriously doubt two is enough, given my previous experience in threads with you.

You now understand, things can move on can't they?

-AC


sorry about that AC. i am not afraid to admit that a.) i'm not that bright. and b.) i jump into things before i honestly know what's going on. c.) way too many encounters AC about me and my stupidty. 😮
now...carrying on...

Saratn : By what standard is rape wrong ?

Originally posted by Saratn
b.)tabloids?

Use a dictionary

well let's see here...ummm well the biggest thing is that rape is forcing someone to have sex against their will. not to mention that it is sick, and that it is illegal, and people can spend serious time in jail for that. people who are rapist may do this for multiple reasons. they have a bad sex life, want to feel good about themselves, childhood, uncontrolable urges, etc. people shouldn't be forced to do things like that if they don't want to. that's one of the bases of why i want to be a D.A. and that is mainly what SVU is about.

and IG, sorry for asking what it meant. i should have known that speds like me need to carrya dictionary everywhere i go.

Originally posted by Saratn
and IG, sorry for asking what it meant. i should have known that speds like me need to carrya dictionary everywhere i go.

Speds?

seeing how i feel generous...speds is special education

wow thats a dumb question. Lets see... Is ass raping a mongoose whilst on fire and licking children wrong? hmm toughy.

You do realise that people like you, coming into this thread and reacting in a way you think you should, just makes you look worse than dumb, right?

-AC

Is rape wrong?

Well seeing how it is a social norm in many societies that it is, then perhaps the question should be WHY is rape wrong.

Well, as the intent of this thread is to discuss moral relativsm and the concept of wrong...

... moved to Philosophy.

because you are forcing someone to do something against their own will

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You do realise that people like you, coming into this thread and reacting in a way you think you should, just makes you look worse than dumb, right?

-AC


I think the thread starter looks dumber, "Is rape wrong?" the answer is YES. The thread title should be like Lil Bitchiness said "WHY is rape wrong?"

Originally posted by Eis
I think the thread starter looks dumber, "Is rape wrong?" the answer is YES. The thread title should be like Lil Bitchiness said "WHY is rape wrong?"

Like I said, you do realise that the intent of this thread was to discover why, right? All it took was reading to realise why he created the thread. After he's explained what the intention of the thread is, anyone misunderstanding it's intent post-explanation is just stupid.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Like I said, you do realise that the intent of this thread was to discover why, right? All it took was reading to realise why he created the thread. After he's explained what the intention of the thread is, anyone misunderstanding it's intent post-explanation is just stupid.

-AC


The explanation was post-the middle of the first page.
The thread starter should've explained where the thread was aimed in the FIRST post.

So? There was still an explanation, was there not? Yes. Hence my saying that anyone not understanding the thread post-explanation was stupid. People coming in at the last page and assuming what the thread is about, are stupid. That's the beauty of threads like this, stupid people just make themselves look more stupid. At least those who disagreed also contributed.

The point is that you have the ability to read the posts or ask what he meant. If you had done either, as some people did (and shock horror, he explained) then there would be no misunderstandings.

If you're unsure, ask. Don't assume.

Done.

-AC

How can anyone be unsure?!
The thread title is "Is rape wrong" and the first post says "Well?" it's absolutley logical to act the way most members acted.

Maybe people should simply learn to use their brains and think instead of jumping to the obvious conclusion.

Originally posted by Eis
How can anyone be unsure?!
The thread title is "Is rape wrong" and the first post says "Well?" it's absolutley logical to act the way most members acted.

Not after the explanation it isn't. Which is when most of the idiots arrived.

It happened before with his U.F.O thread. There were two "idiot disclaimer" notes in the first post a long with an explanation of what the thread was REALLY about. People still managed to get it wrong a few PAGES in.

There's no preparation for idiots, nor should someone have to cater to them.

-AC