Which x-men has the greatest agility

Started by wolverine88887 pages

lol night cralwer has higher agility then all the guys u name befor him lol. gambit dont even ahve super human agility he has peak. as for havok havok far form top 20. also wolverien is mroe agile then gambit

Originally posted by wolverine8888
lol night cralwer has higher agility then all the guys u name befor him lol. gambit dont even ahve super human agility he has peak. as for havok havok far form top 20. also wolverien is mroe agile then gambit
Nocturne is Nightcrawler's daughter, she inherited her father's anatomy, the anatomy that enables his peak to surpass most X-Men. Her agility is near or equal to his.

Blink is more agile than Wolverine.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
also dodging out of spidermans attacks would imply wolverine would have to ahve superhuman reflexes and agility and keep at the same pace as spiderman. also when spiderman is going throught the city on his webs u see wolverine right next to him jumping from biulding to building do u know how fast wolverine would have to be moving far quickering then gambit can i can tell u that. also thsi pic is a betetr feat the gmabit deflecting a few shots it has wolverine actauly cutting a dart from a gun at piont blank to pieces
1) I said it twice already: Even regular buggers and criminals have dodged or hit Spiderman, the "God of reflexes and agility" in Marvel, when it supported the story and drama.
Does that imply they all have the same superhuman reflexes and agility???

2) So cutting a dart from a gun at point blank range to pieces is far more impressive than deflecting a salve of shots at point blank range and directing them back at the gunner...am i getting that right?

IT'S HOPELESS...I GIVE UP!!!

Wolverine8888, when you set your mind on showing that Wolverine is the best, no argument however reasonable and presented however eloquently will be able to convince you of something different.
You started with AT LEAST admitting that Beast and Nightcrawler are more agile than Wolvie, changed to Wolvie being as agile as them and now reached the point of proclaiming he is in Spiderman's league...WHAT CAN I, a normal human, POSSIBLY DO AGAINST THAT GRADE OF SELF DELUSION AND IGNORANCE???!!!

Originally posted by wannabe
WHAT CAN I, a normal human, POSSIBLY DO AGAINST THAT GRADE OF SELF DELUSION AND IGNORANCE???!!!
Smile, nod politely and back away slowly...

they'll just keep coming

Originally posted by wannabe
1) I said it twice already: Even regular buggers and criminals have dodged or hit Spiderman, the "God of reflexes and agility" in Marvel, when it supported the story and drama.
Does that imply they all have the same superhuman reflexes and agility???

2) So cutting a dart from a gun at point blank range to pieces is far more impressive than deflecting a salve of shots at point blank range and directing them back at the gunner...am i getting that right?

IT'S HOPELESS...I GIVE UP!!!

Wolverine8888, when you set your mind on showing that Wolverine is the best, no argument however reasonable and presented however eloquently will be able to convince you of something different.
You started with AT LEAST admitting that Beast and Nightcrawler are more agile than Wolvie, changed to Wolvie being as agile as them and now reached the point of proclaiming he is in Spiderman's league...WHAT CAN I, a normal human, POSSIBLY DO AGAINST THAT GRADE OF SELF DELUSION AND IGNORANCE???!!!

u arnt very good at listening ar eu. I said keep up he is not quite as agile as either of the two but he can keep up with them. yes he not quite as agile but if there were boncing through a forest or in teh city he would easiliy fallow them. my arguement is that gambit is only a peak human when it comrs to agility and he is not superhuman he is unable to be at wolverine level.
yes cutting a dart to nuthing at piont blank is fa better then deflecting 3 blasts at the perosn who shot it at u.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
u arnt very good at listening ar eu. I said keep up he is not quite as agile as either of the two but he can keep up with them. yes he not quite as agile but if there were boncing through a forest or in teh city he would easiliy fallow them. my arguement is that gambit is only a peak human when it comrs to agility and he is not superhuman he is unable to be at wolverine level.
yes cutting a dart to nuthing at piont blank is fa better then deflecting 3 blasts at the perosn who shot it at u.
A sprinter can run after a gymnast flipping through a forest... so a sprinter is as agile as a gymnast. Pfft.

Wolverine is stated as needing an hour to fully recover from a gunshot wound in a non-vital area of his body... funny how you don't rigidly proclaim that. Gambit is more agile than Wolverine.

Nightcrawler is classified as peak human agility too, his peak being clearly higher than most people under Spider-Man. His peak being clearly leagues above Wovlerine, as are Blink and Nocturne's peaks, as is Gambit's peak.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Nocturne is Nightcrawler's daughter, she inherited her father's anatomy, the anatomy that enables his peak to surpass most X-Men. Her agility is near or equal to his.

Blink is more agile than Wolverine.

Iceman is back... hes the most agile now 😛, hes got his moisture inversion thing going for him (although I don't know if he has lost his secondary mutation/ and /or this affects his moisture inversion ability)

I'm kidding btw

Originally posted by wolverine8888
u arnt very good at listening ar eu. I said keep up he is not quite as agile as either of the two but he can keep up with them. yes he not quite as agile but if there were boncing through a forest or in teh city he would easiliy fallow them. my arguement is that gambit is only a peak human when it comrs to agility and he is not superhuman he is unable to be at wolverine level.
yes cutting a dart to nuthing at piont blank is fa better then deflecting 3 blasts at the perosn who shot it at u.
You said: "...Wolverine can keep up with them ALL THE TIME..."! (see, i'm actually quite good at listening)
I don't know what the others think, but for me that kind of proclamation implies nothing but Logan being as good as Beast or Nightcrawler.
And stating that Wolverine is on par with Spiderman, who is even more agile than Hank and Kurt, says that.............well do i have to finish the sentence?

Btw...interesting how you consistantly ceep on ignoring the core statement of a post and try to use insignificant details in your favour...even if they are not useable at all.

i'm pretty sure when one of the greatest known researchers of mutants examines you, then says your agility comes from a lifetime of work and practice only moderately aided by your physique, it sticks. you show me where nightcrawler contradicts moira, and i'll concede...