George W. Bush

Originally posted by FeceMan
AC, I think it's funny that you think I'm worried about my 'credibility' on KMC. If I truly cared, I would do the following:

1. Drop Christianity and either become an atheist, agnostic, or Muslim. If I were to choose to follow Islam, I would also say that I was from the Middle East. Then I would laugh my ass off as people characterized Christians as gay-hating rednecks and then went off on others who dared to mention Islamic Fundamentalists.

2. Become pro-choice. Except in the case of criminals. Then I'd be pro-life. And I'd support organizations like NAMBLA because I would...

3. Be a moral relativist. Sweet.

4. Hate Bush with a passion undying and refer to any of his supporters as rednecks and hicks.

5. Constantly ***** about the U.S. military and our being in Iraq. And by 'constantly', I mean 'every other thread'. Oh, and I forgot to add Bush to the topics of bitchery, though that should probably go under number four.

6. Feign compassion for all sorts of crap that doesn't matter.

7. Do all sorts of other crap that I don't feel like listing.

Though you apparantly felt the need to list 7 irrelevent things. I say irrelevent because after all, you're not concerned about your credibility here...right?

Originally posted by FeceMan
I hate to pull an Adam here, but...

[b]ig·no·rant adj.
1. Lacking education or knowledge.
2. Showing or arising from a lack of education or knowledge: an ignorant mistake.
3. Unaware or uninformed.

And thus you're simply saying what you believe the word means and how it pertains to slam Bush. [/B]

I concede my point. I thought one meaning of ignorance was unaware or uninformed, also a lack of knowledge.

Oh wait. Can you give me a minute? Thanks.

*Does a lot of scientific experiments*

Well, it would appear that ignorance does also mean what I just said, which is what I slammed Bush for. I said the difference between ignorance and stupidity is the same difference as knowing something and ignoring it, or just not knowing something because you are dumb. Now whether you want to call Bush ignorant or stupid (I believe he is both based on, well, everything he's done or said) the fact of the matter is, neither of those qualities are good to have in a president.

My original point was that the guy is stupid. He clearly has problems with pronounciation, grammar, forming a sentence, location of countries...

-AC

It would appear that deriding Bush has become a popular past-time. I think that's wonderful, but its a shame that it is a year or so too late...

The list of his errors is too lengthy to mention in great detail, but let's take a glance at a list I can think of:

- Misuse of 'intelligence' as a means to legitmize a war.
- Parading around like the war was over, when more soldiers have died since the 'end'.
- Failure to produce any kind of long and short-term stratergy for rebuilding.
- Dereliction of duty by the highest members of his government - Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rove...
- Rejection of International Law - Geneva convention, UN-approval for war...
- Inability - or unwilling - to act in the face of domestic tragedy - the Katrina debacle.
- Proclaiming freedom for all, whilst restricting it for many - homeland security measures.

Oh, I'm bored...Someone else add some more...

Of course, I failed to even mention all the dirty deals with mega-corporations...

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I concede my point. I thought one meaning of ignorance was unaware or uninformed, also a lack of knowledge.

-AC

Originally posted by FeceMan
Except you clearly defined it as not being informed but as ignoring the facts.

A) I wasn't actually conceding my point.

B) That is also ignorant.

I do like the way you've allowed yourself to be drawn into a debate about what the correct negative, disparaging term is. With regards to Bush.

Proves my point with Bush supporters. They don't care what they argue for, even if it's anti-Bush. As long as it's their point of view that prevails.

If I called Bush a stupid idiot and you believed he was more leaning to the side of being an ignorant *******, you'd probably argue that.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri

Proves my point with Bush supporters. They don't care what they argue for, even if it's anti-Bush. As long as it's their point of view that prevails.

-AC

well if you ever get the chance to take a step back from your own pieces, I think you might see that you continue to argue until you feel as if your point of view prevails.......funny🙂 lol ✅ 🐰

There's a difference between belligerently sticking to a (dis?)belief proved to be false and belligerently sticking to a truth that remains so. One of those actions is known as 'lying', the other is known as having 'integrity'. It seems plain to see which label Bush and his followers deserve...(HINT: It's spelt the same as the prefered posture when using a bed).

Anyone who observes Bush's deeds should realise that by now...Unless, of course, you have sh!t for brains. Wait a second...

*PING* A Light-bulb finds its calling...

Originally posted by soleran30
well if you ever get the chance to take a step back from your own pieces, I think you might see that you continue to argue until you feel as if your point of view prevails.......funny🙂 lol ✅ 🐰

And if you read my post you'll see what context I said it in. The purpose of a debate is to make your P.o.V prevail. The point I made was that Bush supporters will do this even if it's a matter of "What kind of shit is Bush, runny or solid?"

Please don't try to catch me out.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Though you apparantly felt the need to list 7 irrelevent things. I say irrelevent

Useful tip- when the letters 'a' or 'e' appear near the end of the word, you are about to select the wrong one.

Choose the other.

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
He graduated from YALE!

GO DUB'YA!!!!

they actually compared john kerry's and George Bush's test scores when they were in the guard. Bush's scores were higher

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
A) I wasn't actually conceding my point.

B) That is also ignorant.

I do like the way you've allowed yourself to be drawn into a debate about what the correct negative, disparaging term is. With regards to Bush.

Proves my point with Bush supporters. They don't care what they argue for, even if it's anti-Bush. As long as it's their point of view that prevails.

If I called Bush a stupid idiot and you believed he was more leaning to the side of being an ignorant *******, you'd probably argue that.

-AC

that's not a good idea to generalize. all bushies aren't like that. i'm a independent, but i still think that bush is a hell of a lot better than any left wing jackass

Wait, slow everything down. Slam on the brakes.

Are people actually starting to convince themselves that Bush ISN'T an idiot?

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Wait, slow everything down. Slam on the brakes.

Are people actually starting to convince themselves that Bush ISN'T an idiot?

-AC

just because you disagree with his moral or political views, doesn't mean he is an idiot. if u are talking about book smarts, he's got alot of that

I'm not calling him an idiot because I disagree with his political views or moral views. There are plenty of smart people with stupid views.

The fact that he is actually a stupid man as proven by his very basic actions and lack of intelligence, is why I say it.

I know someone who a hell of a lot of book smarts. You ask him to discuss the nature of infinity and he just goes blank.

-AC

monkeys who type on a typewriter for eternity will eventually type out the whole works of shakespeare😄

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm not calling him an idiot because I disagree with his political views or moral views. There are plenty of smart people with stupid views.

The fact that he is actually a stupid man as proven by his very basic actions and lack of intelligence, is why I say it.

I know someone who a hell of a lot of book smarts. You ask him to discuss the nature of infinity and he just goes blank.

-AC

in that case, with your philosophy, i think Bill clinton is an idiot because of the actions he did in his agendas and personal life

Originally posted by cheldon
in that case, with your philosophy, i think Bill clinton is an idiot because of the actions he did in his agendas and personal life

As I said before, there's such a thing as smart people with idiotic views.

George Bush is actually dumb.

-AC

also bush is an evil child abusing satanist who is the biggest puppet on earth.
did i mention rascist. oh and a drug runner.

Much of the ‘anti-drug’ network is deeply corrupt and used as a vehicle for distributing drugs without detection. George Bush has fronted more wars on drugs than any other American politician and yet he is one of North America’s premier drug barons. A reporter on the San Jose Mercury News exposed the CIA’s involvement in putting crack cocaine into the black community of Los Angeles. This was during the period Bush was in the White House and both the journalist and the paper were hit by a
tidal wave of ridicule and abuse from the establishment papers like the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times as the Brotherhood tried to crush the story. Even the running of drugs comes down to bloodlines, by the way. A friend has a contact who was offered the job of being a drug courier by a US government agency. He refused, but asked why
they had approached him. “We know what your bloodline is,” came the reply. One of the codes, he found out, was to have your hand cut across the palm. If you are ever caught, you show the authorities your hand and they let you go. The anti-drug agencies are controlled by the drug cartels and when you hear of ‘big drug busts’, it is usually the Brotherhood eliminating the competition and giving the impression of action. The drug pushers are difficult to find? Then how come a youngster straight off the bus in a new city can find them in an hour? If you are taking
hard drugs, or thinking of doing so, remember this: You are not being a ‘rebel’ or ‘dropping out’, you are committing mental, emotional, spiritual and eventually physical, suicide, and you are doing exactly what the people who control this world want you to do. The choice is yours, but understand the game before you start.

this guy worked for The Observer newspaper in London. I told him about the paedophile activities of George Bush and his drug running operation. I offered to put him in touch with some of those who had been abused by Bush. What did this ‘journalist’ do? He went away and wrote an article making personal attacks on me, including the fact that my eyes appeared bloodshot. Not surprising after a non stop speaking tour of Australia, New Zealand and the United States over a period of two months, but how can anyone write about the state of someone’s eyes when they are being offered, as he put it himself, the “Story of the century”? Because he’s a journalist, that’s why I offered to put the British Sunday People in contact with similar sources, but they didn’t want to know. As the old saying goes: “You cannot bribe or twist the great British journalist, but seeing what they will do unbribed, there’s no reason to.” Of course there are journalists who are exceptions, and honourable ones, but they are so, so rare and ask them what happens when they try to write the story as it really is.
Journalists dance to the official tune and become the copy typists and town criers for the official version of life. They are the ‘gofers’ for those higher up the media pyramid.

http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/littleboys.html

Originally posted by cheldon
they actually compared john kerry's and George Bush's test scores when they were in the guard. Bush's scores were higher

Conservative propoganda showed Bush's scores as higher.

Liberal propoganda showed Kerry's scores as higher.

Regardless, Bush's speech defects and geographical misconceptions, as alluded to countless times within this thread, have proven to me time and time again that our president is not fit for his job.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Proves my point with Bush supporters. They don't care what they argue for, even if it's anti-Bush. As long as it's their point of view that prevails.

-AC