Originally posted by Deano
monkeys who type on a typewriter for eternity will eventually type out the whole works of shakespeare😄
Sadly for you, the average life-span of modern man is just into his 70s...Maybe you have enough time to produce something akin to Dan Brown's books though!
Originally posted by cheldon
in that case, with your philosophy, i think Bill clinton is an idiot because of the actions he did in his agendas and personal life
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
Vs.
"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories. You remember when Colin Powell stood up in front of the world, and he said, Iraq has got laboratories, mobile labs to build biological weapons. They're illegal. They're against the United Nations resolutions, and we've so far discovered two. And we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them." (May 29, 2003)
One led to a tricky period for a guy's marriage, the other led to a war that is yet to end, but has cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of people.
Engage your brain next time you attempt to formulate a thought.
Originally posted by FeceMan
I'm not acknowledging idiocy in any case. Since that would be conceding my point and all.
You're not conceding your point but you're not defending it either, besides a very flimsy (and untrue) little retort. Also, considering the fact that he is quite obviously stupid, that leaves two conclusions to be drawn doesn't it?
That you are either denying his stupidity for the sake of it (because to anyone with eyes, ears and reasonably brain power it's easy to see Bush is an idiot), or you genuinely do not believe the man his stupid.
Both courses of action are acts of idiocy. The former more so.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You're not conceding your point but you're not defending it either, besides a very flimsy (and untrue) little retort. Also, considering the fact that he is quite obviously stupid, that leaves two conclusions to be drawn doesn't it?That you are either denying his stupidity for the sake of it (because to anyone with eyes, ears and reasonably brain power it's easy to see Bush is an idiot), or you genuinely do not believe the man his stupid.
Both courses of action are acts of idiocy. The former more so.
-AC
Would you like to add anything else? Or would you prefer to continue on with the "I AM RITE U R WRONG" monologue? (I apologize for interrupting.)
What's funny is that you share some of the qualities that whob does and you don't even know it.
Originally posted by FeceMan
🙄Would you like to add anything else? Or would you prefer to continue on with the "I AM RITE U R WRONG" monologue? (I apologize for interrupting.)
What's funny is that you share some of the qualities that whob does and you don't even know it.
Whob tells people they're wrong when they've proved him wrong and dodges any kind of point that retracts credibility from his debates. Ironically, you are now doing this and have been for a while. "George Bush is an idiot." "Give me one example where that's more objective than subjective." "I didn't say it was more objective. There are objective elements, like here *Example*" "I'm not conceding my point...." How about just replying to what I've said?
It's not just me who believes Bush is an idiot, not just presidentially but "normally", it's many other people. It's also based on a lot of evidence.
As Krunk'd pointed out, to dislike us calling him out on it, fair enough. To deny it ever happening and to deny his stupidity just because you like the man is stupidity in itself.
What I'd like from you, since you asked, is for you to stop continually displaying another Whob quality (dodging relentlessly) and either retort realistically or concede. Don't run backward while shouting things. Stay here and defend your already blinkered (and genuinely naive) point of view, or don't speak. I'm not saying I've owned, smashed etc you. I'm asking you to present something realistic that hasn't yet been fairly countered by multiple people.
Regardless of whether Whob misuses this notion, it happens to be true:
Some issues really are as simple as one side being right, one being wrong. If it's going to come down to a debate on "Is Bush stupid, or is he not?" then there is really only one side coming out of it, if we are judging by fact.
You can pull out his Yale degree and all the "It's not 'stupidity' it's...". I'll just say "He asked what state a country was in, pronounced nu-clear as nook-u-lar and various other words, can barely string a sentence together without his brain overheating (see the election debates)".
Like I said at the very beginning, philosophising is all well and good, but the man is stupid. No amount of accusing me to save yourself will erase that simple concept.
So if you are genuinely done with discussing things here, then so am I, at least with you. If not, do so sensibly.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It really is ironic how much you just helped prove my point with that post.
No I didn't, hippie. Seriously, how the hell are you gonna call an Ivy league graduate stupid? Of course he pronounces "nuclear" differently than you , your British and he's a Texan. Did you expect to have the same pronunciation as him?????
GO DUB'YA!!!!!
Let me interject here for a minute.....
The man is an idiot.
Plain and simple. Support him all you want, ignore his verbal stupidity all you want....
But the man is a fool. It's just too bad that his office implies loyalty from other nations. Why don't I respct England, in the utmost? Because it will always vote in favor of a majority that wants to be our lap dog. Why do I respect my own people, even less? Because we have the right to change things....we simply don't....due to stupidity. And for it, we deserve to be the punchline of the rest of the world. Period.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Whob tells people they're wrong when they've proved him wrong and dodges any kind of point that retracts credibility from his debates. Ironically, you are now doing this and have been for a while. "George Bush is an idiot." "Give me one example where that's more objective than subjective." "I didn't say it was more objective. There are objective elements, like here *Example*" "I'm not conceding my point...." How about just replying to what I've said?
It's not just me who believes Bush is an idiot, not just presidentially but "normally", it's many other people. It's also based on a lot of evidence.
As Krunk'd pointed out, to dislike us calling him out on it, fair enough. To deny it ever happening and to deny his stupidity just because you like the man is stupidity in itself.
What I'd like from you, since you asked, is for you to stop continually displaying another Whob quality (dodging relentlessly) and either retort realistically or concede. Don't run backward while shouting things. Stay here and defend your already blinkered (and genuinely naive) point of view, or don't speak. I'm not saying I've owned, smashed etc you. I'm asking you to present something realistic that hasn't yet been fairly countered by multiple people.
Regardless of whether Whob misuses this notion, it happens to be true:Some issues really are as simple as one side being right, one being wrong. If it's going to come down to a debate on "Is Bush stupid, or is he not?" then there is really only one side coming out of it, if we are judging by fact.
You can pull out his Yale degree and all the "It's not 'stupidity' it's...". I'll just say "He asked what state a country was in, pronounced nu-clear as nook-u-lar and various other words, can barely string a sentence together without his brain overheating (see the election debates)".
Like I said at the very beginning, philosophising is all well and good, but the man is stupid. No amount of accusing me to save yourself will erase that simple concept.
So if you are genuinely done with discussing things here, then so am I, at least with you. If not, do so sensibly.
-AC
Originally posted by FeceMan
I see very little that deserves a reply. All your posts are is "you are wrong, Bush is retarded, end of story". You haven't provided any objective evidence (zomg he does not articulate well, oh noes), though I will say that mistaking Wales for a city is a large gaff (though it hardly proves stupidity).
This is exactly what I mean though. Me saying "You are wrong, Bush is stupid, end of story" is all there needs to be, realistically. Not because it's my opinion, but because it's true. I can't force you to admit the objective evidence is there, so your continual denying that his acts are those of stupidity, is not something I can change. You've chosen to turn a blind eye to my posts and his actions. You are the only one who can turn it back and I don't think you will any time soon.
Originally posted by FeceMan
Yeah, and it's not just you who believes that abortion is okay. 🙄
Fece, I'm over here...with the actual topic. Feel free to re-join me as I reply to your next quote. Thanks.
Originally posted by FeceMan
Yes, I DISLIKE you because you call Bush stupid. That must be it.
Where did I say you dislike me? For someone accusing me of Whob qualities, I might send one of your posts each to separated at birth.
Originally posted by FeceMan
I've already defended my point of view. Everything you said is not indicative of either mental retardation or stupidity. And it doesn't matter what I say, for I will be wrong no matter what. Bush could have gotten all As in college, taken the most difficult studies, and scored 180 on an IQ test and you would still say he was stupid.
Considering those tests don't indicate intelligence, your point is...pointless. At school you learn, you take exams on what you've learnt and you pass them. It's not that big a deal. I know many people who have all the grades in the world but don't know anything outside of academics.
You've defended your point of view? How? You've done the opposite of what you claim I did, which I didn't do. "It's my point of view but of course it's wrong because you're right. *Runs away*" You've just turned a blind eye to anything anyone else has said.
Reiterating: If you can't reply worthwhile, don't reply.
-AC