Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Then you should report Abhi. He posts in every Thor thread. Must be a fan.. He's also a Surfer fan btw.
Stop trying to protect him with those filthy lies. We all know the truth.
He's a Superman fan 😘
He's getting reported over 9,000 times an hour and that's not even including my reports.
Originally posted by One-Punch
I'm just putting two-and-two together. But according to you there's absolutely no way having the most powerful solar energy in existing coursing through Superman would amp him?
Going with the battery analogy, wouldn't a more powerful energy source simply charge a battery faster? It shouldn't make it more powerful.
Superman as a solar battery wouldn't automatically reach a new level just because the energy source is more powerful. (unless regular solar energy is somehow unable to "fill him to the brim".
Originally posted by Eel O'Brien
Going with the battery analogy, wouldn't a more powerful energy source simply charge a battery faster? It shouldn't make it more powerful.Superman as a solar battery wouldn't automatically reach a new level just because the energy source is more powerful. (unless regular solar energy is somehow unable to "fill him to the brim".
What in the world. I haven't seen this name in a long time.
Originally posted by Eel O'Brien
Going with the battery analogy, wouldn't a more powerful energy source simply charge a battery faster? It shouldn't make it more powerful.Superman as a solar battery wouldn't automatically reach a new level just because the energy source is more powerful. (unless regular solar energy is somehow unable to "fill him to the brim".
Being charged by a more powerful energy source does make a difference. For example nuclear batteries are in the works, and they would be able to power your cellphone forever:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/190555-this-nuclear-battery-could-power-your-smartphone-forever-as-long-as-you-dont-value-your-life-or-sperm-count-too-highly
A better analogy would coal vs. uranium.
1kg of uranium produces 24,000,000 kWh of heat vs. 1kg of coal which produces only 12 kWh of heat. Which engine would be more powerful, the one using coal or uranium? The choice is obvious.
With Superman, he's a solar powered engine currently being powered by "the most powerful solar energy in existence" (i.e., uranium), rather than regular solar energy (i.e., coal). It has psychologically and physically changed him drastically, so I don't think it's a stretch at all to think it would amp him.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So the energy that charges your phone matters if it came from a uranium power plant vs a coal power plant?
Guys, this isn't the place for this.
Arguing that he was amped is something you could do, sure, but proving it would be another matter entirely, until he does something completely out of his normal reach.
Either way, this thread is for scans, and carver gushing over anything that makes Superman look bad. That's all it can be used for.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
The rate at which it charges would be constant. My charger can only draw a certain amount of power.Let's say he IS amped. Can he beat Hulk convincingly now? Thor? Surfer? Odin? Galactus? Beyonder?
Wait, he needs more feats, THEN we can place him? Ok then.
I have no clue, he's featless at the moment I agree. I just think it's kind of dumb to assume there's no way he can possibly be amped, despite him being powered by the most powerful solar energy in existence, and him going through this transformation, lol.
It's a different form of energy, more powerful than regular solar energy but it only charged him.
When you're hungry or feeling week, for a quick recharge, eating a snicker is as good as eating apple. One is better than the other but neither provides an amp other than giving you a quick recharge. I know this is superman and he handles energy differently but It's not a blue star type of amp because they stated its just a more powerful version of solar energy. So I don't this he was amped.
