Originally posted by SamZEDYeah my thoughts exactly I like the idea of the Red Goblin though.
I hated the ending tbh. I understand what he's trying to do but it's a lazy writing. Why the F would psychotic blood thirsty Carnage-Osborn offer something like that? That's completely out of character. And Why the F would Parker agree? Like he actually expects Norman to keep his word once Peter Parker starts coming after him wothout the costume. Of course he won't, so why bother with the charade?
Originally posted by abhilegend
Also nukes did the damage, eh bran?https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/38186100/Thanos_-_The_Infinity_Siblings-059.jpg.html
Never fails to make me laugh. Universal Galactus right there.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman taking the same attack.😂
God planets>>>conventional planets
Under Starlin Superman went from Surfer/Thor level vs Darkseid is Cosmic Odyssey to and spirit physiological capable of physically overpowering Infinity zman, Darkseid acknowledging him as a physical rival and shattering the combined Source+AntiIfe matching Godfire Darkseid who was explicitly Millions of times more powerful than his standard Skyfather class level.
Oh God Abhi's pathetic. I wish I didn't read that.
Galactus was standing in the middle of a star going nova in the same series. A weakened one gets taken out with a double planet and a "sizable nuclear device" (iirc Pip had a backpack full of bombs capable of taking out half a planet).
You can even see the explosion and then a huge flash of light not seen in the Superman example which was posted for whatever reason...
Apparently Thanos tech bombs can't be special according to Abhi or something, I don't know. And Hunger saying the planet was dropped on the thing that might allow him to get the rest of his body means anything else did nothing? He said what happened, he didn't retcon it by omission.
It's either a low feat or it has some sort of explanation. It's not like Starlin wrote Galactus that great when he weakened himself to hunger piercing Thanos' shield (mind you he did imply it's been "too long" since he last fed). And then threw a (seemingly) more powerful attack at Hunger.
Even just two planets colliding wouldn't be the worst thing to take out hungry Galactus. 😬
But you know, Abhi, so that's explanation enough. The guy's obsessed, and he's probably been trying to get my attention in every post. At least I know to stop at the name now.
Originally posted by abhilegend😆
Also nukes did the damage, eh bran?https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/38186100/Thanos_-_The_Infinity_Siblings-059.jpg.html
Never fails to make me laugh. Universal Galactus right there.
You should probably read your own scans. The showings are completely different for Superman and Galactus.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
😂 Punisher beating an Iron Man knock off with a knife. Then taking on the Avengers in one.The best part is how he can just take everything apart by sticking his knife into the creases. It doesn't even make any sense. In this very comic, one of those suits can survive at the bottom of the ocean for hours, tank artillery and orbital drops.
The part that bugs me is him saying he knows the suits weaknesses based on his. Any suit made by stark isnt supposed to have structural weaknesses...let alone ones obvious enough for freaking frank castle to find...let alone ones that can be exploited with a phucking knife 😂
Originally posted by One Big Mob
Oh God Abhi's pathetic. I wish I didn't read that.Galactus was standing in the middle of a star going nova in the same series. A weakened one gets taken out with a double planet and a "sizable nuclear device" (iirc Pip had a backpack full of bombs capable of taking out half a planet).
You can even see the explosion and then a huge flash of light not seen in the Superman example which was posted for whatever reason...Apparently Thanos tech bombs can't be special according to Abhi or something, I don't know. And Hunger saying the planet was dropped on the thing that might allow him to get the rest of his body means anything else did nothing? He said what happened, he didn't retcon it by omission.
It's either a low feat or it has some sort of explanation. It's not like Starlin wrote Galactus that great when he weakened himself to hunger piercing Thanos' shield (mind you he did imply it's been "too long" since he last fed). And then threw a (seemingly) more powerful attack at Hunger.
Even just two planets colliding wouldn't be the worst thing to take out hungry Galactus. 😬But you know, Abhi, so that's explanation enough. The guy's obsessed, and he's probably been trying to get my attention in every post. At least I know to stop at the name now.
Still trying to excuse Galactus shitty showings, eh?
Nukes are what caused that.
crylaugh
Originally posted by JayDaDon
The part that bugs me is him saying he knows the suits weaknesses based on his. Any suit made by stark isnt supposed to have structural weaknesses...let alone ones obvious enough for freaking frank castle to find...let alone ones that can be exploited with a phucking knife 😂
1) Frank's knife has stabbed through Loebforce Rulk.
2) Frank has blown Tony's black-and-gold suit to bits.
3) This is the fucking Punisher, dude.
